![]() |
Cruel Chinese (video)
http://video.news.sky.com/skynews/vi...urceID=1266788
Imagine what they'll do to you, the the inferior Caucasian, if only given a chance... |
|
...But they make a damn good take-away
|
if you like tortured dog meat tenderized with cancer causing chemicals
Quote:
|
the soldier in the picture looks oriental
Quote:
|
gee.. tigers eating animals.
unbelievable. oohh the HORROR!!!! the "retard factor" seems to go up around here lately. |
So I guess when I watch the discovery channels and a lion in Africa is going after a gazelle the filmmaker should shoot the lion ot save the gazelle. But no they just film it and show it to us. They are sick and so are we for watching.
|
Confederate scum... People like you are a disgrace to humanity.
|
I would pay to go visit one of those places.
That is pretty bad ass. (the tigers eating stuff, not the trained bear crap) Not much difference between having the humans slaughter the animals first and throw out hunks of raw meat. At least this way they get to fulfill their natural instincts by actually killing their prey instead of being hand-fed. |
Disgrace.the tigers are over fed
|
I dont see any difference between this and what Michael Vick did. It has nothing to do with race. Every country has assholes that treat animals like shit. Some countries even torture humans for fun. So instead of blaming the chinese for everything, look at yourself first.
|
Quote:
|
not the tigers, the cow. Yeah you can say that the cow would have died anyways, but doing it for entertainment value I would say is degrading = treating like shit.
I eat meat, pork, and chicken like anyone else. I dont claim to be a saint. But if two dogs are bred for fighting for entertainment value is cruel, I would argue the same for the cow. |
Quote:
i can see where that changes everything. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
are you suggesting that tigers got "overfed" (as if that makes any sense) by NOT eating? how do you determine a tiger is "overfed"? if they aren't eathing the cows... then what are they eating that caused them to be "overfed"? cupcakes, ice cream and chocolate milk? they didn't look obese to me... they looked exactly like healthy tigers. is "overfed" your word? a caretakers? or the reporters? does being "overfed" mean tigers don't get hungry every few hours? are you a tiger specialist? were these tigers intended to be released back into the wild? is it impairative that they learn to hunt and kill? do you know anything beyond what a 1 minute emotional appeal to crybaby pussies had to tell you? were you equally disturbed when he described the chicken as "terrified" or the duck was "eaten alive" (as if it matters) whether or not a crowd is entertained by the feeding fo the tigers, doesn't change the fact that its nothing unnatural for tigers to kill and eat. since no one can/has proven that they don't eat the cow, then there is nothing to discuss. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
so.... why is it that these animals in the wild don't kill for fun, or if they aren't hungry, yet in this place where they are captive and have live meat thrown in front of them... they do? i mean, a group of them didn't even begin to hesitate to go after the cow... some didn't care. are you saying the tigers who didn't care decided not to kill for fun and the ones who attacked the cow weren't hungry and were just killing for fun... meanwhile, no tiger is actually thinking about food? they carry off the cows... then what? feed them pasta and chardonnay? PS... how many tigers did you interview? |
Quote:
One big problem about posting on this forum is that it's full of uneducated people whose intellectual capacity is... well beyond average. So it's sometimes difficult to answer primary school-level claims like yours. |
Quote:
|
FREE MICHAEL VIC!!
Peta lovers like you is the reason why animals in the US live better than people!!! :321GFY:321GFY |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
puajjjjjjjjj.
|
Quote:
so... now you are presuming to fully understand the motivation of the tigers? you feel their pain? really? didn't i see you on the news a few years back? you were chained to a tree, stopping a logging company from cutting it down because you were the only one that could hear it crying? my point is that YOU are required to make a LOT of assumptions about the animals, their daily routines, their eating habits, the intent of their handlers and so on and so forth to make your point. i'm not making any assumption other than one, which seems quite reasonable... that a dumb journalist was trying to dig up a controversial story... and in a land where prisoners are executed for their organs, and people are risking life and limb for .50 a day to make your Nikes... the best he could do was make a video of tigers being fed and was forced to pepper the report with emotionally charged language to appeal to and incite tards like yourself... and because they video just couldn't get any reaction otherwise. "i'm warning you... if you're squeamish... stop this video now... " to be honest, i expected live people to be pushed out the way he was setting it up... as it turned out.. it was just a cow being fed to hungry tigers and that made you cry. don't cry one day you'll grow up and stop all animals from eating other animals, i'm sure. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
its weird that everyone is so willing to assume everything. kill a cow = OH MY FUCKING GOD bomb some people, rape some kids, genocide, AID's in Africa = change the channel people crack me up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So a person cannot be both pro-human right and pro-animal rights? |
The cow is what is public, wait until the Inferior Caucasian version comes out and with their growing power it won't take long. Still wanna go the Olympics there next year? They have a new game, Inferior Caucasian chased by tigers.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
what are "animal rights"? animals rights is the idea some people have that we should stop treating animals like animals. where do "rights" come from???? ironically, in this case, you also want animals to stop acting like animals. i'm idiotic? really? animals are not people. animals are food. unfortuneately, there are many people who seem to care more about animals than people. imagine if you directed this supposed "outrage" and energy towards helping little Tiffany get a liver transplant to save her life? or towards stopping genocide in Darfur or towards actually doing something that makes the world a better place and improves the lives of others? my point, which seemed to have flown right over your irrational, illogical and misguided head is that PEOPLE and their welfare and wellbeing should come before ANIMALS. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123