New York or San Francisco
 

In which city (NY or SF) would you prefer to live and why?

Neither, San Diego is the best city in the USA. Between those no question SF. New York Sucks

What's so special about San Diego? Isn't San Diego a little bit small?

San Diego is bigger than SF and is the 2nd biggest city in california. The weather is amazing everyday and its a very nice place to live. SF is too but SD is better.

Between SF and NYC, I would say SF.

If you need more sun, live in the South Bay (San Jose).

With that said, I really enjoy San Diego too, especially the towns North of the city.

ADG

Tough call, but would have to go with the city of my birth, SF.

Why? Weather, traffic, cost, location.

Well, if I had to choose, it would be SF. I can't stand the northeast, just a complete different mentality to it.

Northeast = Fast pasted assholes with stupid accents that talk to loud

West Coast = Laid back and smoooooooooooove.

Plus, the 9ers are in SF, so that's all you need right there.

Oops didn't know that (I am from Europe :))

San Francisco

and why?

SF because I got laid many more times with Journey playing in the background than with Frank Sinatra.

Don't stop belieeeevin'....

NYC all day. Nothing against San Fran, but NYC has some amazing stuff going on 24x7 truly. You can always find something to get into.

San Diego = Beach & Babes

nuff said.

Thats what Im sayin :pimp

I've lived in both citys and you couldn't have picked two more pricer places to live. That's why I now live in NC.
Yep I have to deal with rednecks and IQ's lower then 90 but the benefits so out way the others$$$.

I have lived in San Francisco for a while too and I loved the quality of life there. Now I am wondering if I should go back to San Francisco to live there or check out New York. London would be a 3rd alternative but the weather sucks pretty much there.

new york what about cabo

NYC if it wasnt so crazy expensive. SF I have never been there, from a business standpoint it would probably be a better choice.

SF because ive never been to NY. but seriously SF is the shit theres always something to do there, food is great, and the attitude of the city in general is great.

i would live anywhere far away from all them queers in sf

SF..way easier to move around the City.

They're both great...but survival in SF is a lot easier if your short on money. And I mean that literally...SF costs a fortune, but survival is easier. Plus the chicks are easier in SF, even if they're hotter in NY.

New York.. it's my home :)

New York is a great town, but I couldn't see myself living there. The Bay Area is a great place to live and so is Bangkok. That's why I live in both places.

NY i love to be in the action, when i travel i try to stay DOWNTOWN and as close to the busiest fucking places as possible.

London? I don't know how much you make per month but if you go there: cut your income in half.

1 GBP = 2 USD
And they spend the GBP as you would spend USD.

Personally I'd go for SF out of the two.
It's just more laid back than NYC.

Tough call, but would have to go with the city of my birth, SF.

Why? Weather, traffic, cost, location.

I take it you have never been there. I fell in love with the place within minutes of arrival . . . and I spent 30+ years avoiding it like the plague.

NYC hands down, duh