Ccbill and Nats - Can I use the same hosted gallery?
 

Hey guys.. Im uploading tons of new hosted galleries for my program today and several more over the next couple weeks. I just wanted to know if anyone knows if I can use the same galleries for my ccbill affiliates. The galleries are programmed with NATS coding, but because ccbill uses a cookie system on the users computer, theoretically I should be able to use the same galleries for both...

Anyone know the answer to this? I wonder if its better to keep them separate or if theres something I didn't think of that could come up in the future like cascading billing issues etc. ???

Thanks for your input.

your best bet would be to make 2 copies of the .html one for each.

You can always drop an email to [email protected] if you have any questions about that kind of stuff. They are always willing to help.

Ah yeah... ccbills support is awesome.

I will try that... and if anyone else has any experience with this i'd love to hear it!!!!!

CCBILL and NATS can not work on the same anything, without some special programming.

You must even run separate tours, and join pages, or cookies will be dropped like crazy.

But to keep it Simple just make a Tour for CCBILL and a Tour for NATS, with different credit card pages.

There is some code to help with these issues, but keep it simple, 2 tours...Heck it helps with SE's!!!

Edit:
Listen I know people are going to jump in here and say, It can be done, and Yes it can.
Some programs like mpa3 even keep track of the sales like nscash keep track of ccbill sales, how it works I don't know.
Heck NATS might even do this now, just I know with the setup I have/had at the time people using ccbill codes were not getting credit while using the same tours....Fixed, and Paid the Affiliates!

agreed, you should have separate tours and galleries to eliminate any hassles or possible leaks...

Right... well thats the way I have it currently. I have a separate ccbill tour ( www.sendashleytocollege.com/cctour )and the galleries are also separate. I think I will do it this way to avoid any possible leaks. They both have different join pages that link to the same place but I think I agree.

I really appreciate the input guys. You all rock!!!