![]() |
Hot Fuckin' Legs {[PICS]}
http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures...egs--29631.jpg http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures...egs--29614.jpg heheh This site has some pretty great chops... |
Thanks for the RED X dum dumddumdeeeeeeee
|
Yeah... ok...
|
Red x's here to mate, upload them to another place.
|
mmmhmmmm
|
I dont see shit captain.
|
LOL friggin site does hotlink protect sigh... ok, BUT THEY CAME OUT IN POST PREVIEW waaaaaah..
So here they are (just for that those dorks get no more links from me lol) |
weird chops, think i prefer them with normal legs :)
|
kinda creepy lookin..
|
the finger one is so creepy!
|
That's not fucking cool. I'm freakin' out over here!
|
Very strange.... Photoshoper with too much time on his hands
|
creeeeeeepy
|
|
finger legs is fuckin freaky lookin
|
Spiderwoman and ladyfingers:Oh crap:repuke
|
weird pics..
|
Quote:
|
I like the finger legs,cool chop
|
wonder if thats a rip from worth1000.com - they do alot of art like that...
|
Those are some very odd and creepy pics!
|
horrible abuse of photoshop
|
Creepy and ugly as hell.. not the girls, but the chops.
|
That was weird...
|
|
ok those are creepy pics
|
Oh god that is hella creepy, god damn.
|
hummmmm ther isnt anything ther????
|
Some really good chops lol
|
Quote:
|
Odd pictures.
|
funny pix here :):):)
|
haha... that first pic is cool!
|
nice photoshop though..:)
|
er... meh!
|
Quote:
|
gross at first, but wierdly interesting at second glance.
|
Now I think I'm about to learn something
Ok as weird as those two pics are... this is weirder to me.
I came back and right-clicked the images to see if I'd done a noobiocy with the links, but they came out right.. When I back-buttoned to the thread again - YIKE there were no red-x's, the pictures were in the anchors... So somebody more knowledgy than me can maybe tell me why now when I open a new browser and come back to this, there's no red-x? Would it have to do with the double-hyphen in the file name? Teach me, babies, teach me! |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I believe it's your browser caching the images. I have hotlinked pics in the past and previewed a few times to be sure they're not protected - they show up fine regardless how many times I check. Then, after posting the new thread, the images (in the thread itself) don't show up. Basically, it's a shortcoming in Apache's hotlink protection (assuming they are using .htaccess to do it): You see the image the first time - the shortcoming - "linked" from the preview page. When you preview the post the .htaccess kicks in and blocks it, but the image is now in your cache, associated with the actual preview page (notice the uniuqe 'p' value in the URL?). But when you view the images in the actual post, it's a new page (note the URL again) so the blocking works and the cache can't pull the image - it's trying to grab it from the hotlinked site. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me and I wrote it, but that's basically how it works. :Oh crap |
Totally makes sense - in that vague way we non technologists can grasp things abstractly or conceptually but not specifically...
So really it's the browser that remembered it from the cache or offline files instead of pulling it from their server, but the next session or browser I opened basically had to fetch it as it would anyone new to the post? And when I did my URI copy-paste in the address bar and back spaced, it "remembered" it again and filled the gap :P Thanks dude! :D |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123