at what resolution do you consider images to be "high-resolution"??
 

i see alot of places talking about how the have high resolution images that are say 650px by 1000px. then i see other that are like 1050px by 1400px. Reading reviews i see they often have a "hi res: yes / no" heading in their summaries too. With monitors reaching higher and higher resolutions, at what point is an image considered high resolution now?

obviously i consider a 1050x1400px image to be high resolution, but is 600x1000px cuttingit for this description anymore?

nah, 600x1000 is crap, that may have been "hi-res" 8 years ago, but certainly not now...

1600x1200

i'd fully agree with you on that

1024px is the low-res version on many sites. As a reviewer, I consider 1500px and more to be hi-res...

this thread makes me lawlz.

makes sense. so how many years until 1500px is low res? haha. judging by the majority of the sologirl sites i've been in, most are a long fucking way from running hi-res images.

Some of the art nude sites are now offering 5000 or 6000px images to members. Basically native resolution straight out of a high end camera.

BTW 6000px would be enough for a decent quality print (ie: you could examine it closely like a postcard sized print) of at least 24" in size

Dropping to 40ppi (billboard resolution) your print would be over 12 feet in size

I have a 22" widescreen monitor. I consider an image high-res if it gets auto-resized in IE. On my other monitor, anything that fits in my 22" screen is massive and annoying :D

at least 2000px+ x 1000px+

1024x768 @ 60Hz (interlaced)