![]() |
USA, Russia and China will not sign cluster bomb agreement - How typical.......
"(CNN) -- More than 100 nations agreed Wednesday on a treaty that would immediately ban all cluster bombs."
"Some of the world's top producers, users and stockpilers of cluster munitions are absent from the conference, including the U.S., Israel, China, Russia, India and Pakistan, according to Human Rights Watch." Interesting that the countries mentioned here are all in some kind of a dispute, always. :321GFY Read more here: http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe...omb/index.html |
North Korea was there?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why not post it all? "Other countries -- like the United Kingdom, Denmark, France and Japan -- had sought exceptions for certain cluster munitions within their arsenals, Human Rights Watch said." Gee looks like they are against them unless it's the ones they use... lol So it's not like there was anyone in full support of it and at least the US is building safer cluster bombs, that un-arm if they don't hit a target. Take this one for example.. https://youtube.com/watch?v=ua3nLmE7Kow |
no surprise there
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Steve Goose, director of the arms division at Human Rights Watch, said: "It is regrettable that the U.S. and a handful of other states continue to insist on their need to use a weapon that the rest of world is banning because it causes unacceptable harm to civilians." Come to think of it - why not use NAPALM still too? That is pretty effective! |
Quote:
"During the 34-day war in Lebanon in 2006, the United Nations estimated that Israel dropped 4 million bomblets, 1 million of which may not have exploded, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross. More than 250 civilians and bomb-disposal operators have been killed or injured by them in southern Lebanon since the war ended." |
Why not fucking ban all the weapons at the first hand? I mean all weapons, bombs and stuff kill humans in one or another way. Banning one and allowing other is like taking one gun and handing over another to some criminal.
War should be banned by UN. How? I don't know. |
Quote:
Yes this is the exact reason why the US military is the worlds leader in building safer munitions that deactivate after a certain amount of time. This means it's less likely to have a battlefield littered with live ordnance years or decades after a war has come and gone. Can anyone name any other country that is doing the same? |
Quote:
ummm yea maybe we can go back to beating each others brains out with big sticks. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:321GFY |
Quote:
Good one Crockett. Safe weapons! :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In ww2 it took hundreds of bombers flying over cities dropping thousands of bombs to take out targets killing hundreds of thousands of people over the course of the war. A little over 50 years later, we have weapons that can be launched to hit a specific target with one bomb per target accuracy in most cases. Is there still civilian deaths of course and yes that sucks, but it's nothing like what has gone on in the past. While I may not agree with the way our military is used or the politics behind it, there is no other military in the world that has worked as hard as ours has at keeping civilian casualties as low as possible. You think the Russians or the Chinese give a fuck about civilian casualties? Would you rather us still need to level entire cities with hundreds of bombers killing thousands in the process? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"He who did well in war just earns the right, To begin doing well in peace." Robert Browning |
Quote:
Now, I do not just "bitch" at the US - I am in fact a US Citizen by birth and love this country, however, the double standard so often applied by the US bothers me and I would like to see it changed. At this moment in time the US is pretty equal to China and Russia which has no regard to human rights. That I think is sad. :2 cents: |
|
And this one is for the Chinese:
"You can no more win a war than you can win an earthquake." Jeannette Rankin, First Woman Member of Congress |
This one reminds me of something that is going on TODAY!
"It matters not whether these weapons of ours are humane: if they gain us our freedom, they are justified before our conscience and before our God." Adolf Hitler :( |
Quote:
http://www.scifimoviepage.com/images/rollerball.jpg linkhotten |
i bet half the countries signing that shit dont even have cluster bombs
LOL |
Quote:
Idiot :321GFY |
Quote:
In fact, other than what u've read on CNN, what else do u know about russian or China and have u ever been to either of the 2 countries ? |
Quote:
Have u killed any Jews lately ? |
Quote:
Yet of course the USA gets the blame game again.. |
Quote:
"at what cost" ??? really? how about "at the cost of giving a potential enemy a tactical military advantage" seriously man.... what world do you live in when you can't understand something so painfully simple? no one is saying its right.. but any fucking moron with an IQ over 10 can understand the logic and reasoning. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The USA, or Russia to that effect have not necessarely used them on countries, but they do manufacture and sell them for profit ... So they end up being used in Africa at large ,,, The USA are using them/providing them to Ethiopia ( against Somalia ) as well as Nigeria ( gov troops to bomb the so-called insurgents / terrorists / Al-Quaeda .... And they sometimes supply both sides of the conflict. Now, contrary to China and Russia , the USA claims to be the liberator, the freedom spreader, the human rights defender, the world police taking care of the bullies , so by not signing this agreement it shows the true face of the country :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So you could have the same argument against Nuclear weapons and it's pretty obvious no one is giving up Nukes so does that make everyone 2 faced and inhumane? Because they won't give up a tactical advantage? btw how would the "world police" take care of the bullies if they had to give up any weapons that might kill civilians? Oh wait we already have that... it's called the UN and we all know how well they stop the conflicts they get involved with. http://www.pixelsplat.com/temp/un.jpg Look he has a gun but probably no ammo likely mandated by the UN rules of engagement.. |
Quote:
|
Has anyone ever looked at the amount of weapons Brazil creates and sells. it's easy to pick on the US as it is one of the biggest weapons manufacturer, but little Israel is a huge player in sale of weapons.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123