|
So what happened to OSAMA bin LADEN ?
I rarely start political threads, so this one will be an exception.
Nearly 7 years after 9/11, the US has started two big wars (Afghanistan and Iraq) and is planning even a third one (Iran). The 9/11 attacks have totally changed the world we are living in (also for non-Americans, i.e. in air travel, banking, giving up certain civil liberties etc). The war in Iraq alone has costed the US economy over $3 Trillion (> $3,000,000,000,000) as a Nobel_prize winning economist calculates. Yet the man behind the 9/11 attacks is still riding a camel somehwere in the desert? Are you kidding me? Why is it totally not an issue anymore in the US election? Why has the public forgotten about it? I totally don't get it :arcadefre |
ehm... to be honest... currently he is grilling some kosher beef in my garden on my kosher grill. You want to come over and grab some?
|
He retired :)
|
he's working on the best Affiliated program for 2009!
|
Quote:
|
|
The US government was appointed by God, and his actions are based on divine commandments. Most Americans believe this is true.
|
First, I'd say he's hiding in northern Pakistan, not in the desert
Second, I'd say that a death Osama could be more dangerous than a living one Third, I'd say it doesn't make much of a difference if he's alive or not. |
you do realise that whoever PLOTTED those attacks and MADE IT HAPPEN actually has BEEN ARRESTED a long time ago and currenly is residing in GUANTANOMO BAY ?
yeah ?? dont talk if you know nothing .. thank you ! |
I bet he is not in pakistan and not in the desert. He looks completly different now and is living in a normal house and shit right in the middle of us! Mark my words :2 cents:
|
I don't think anybody "get's it" not even the people who really are supposed to
|
|
Quote:
Dumb cockface. Youre right there on the list with Spacedog. Top 10 dumbest people on gfy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html
Pakistan's president says he thinks Osama bin Laden is most likely dead because the suspected terrorist has been unable to get treatment for his kidney disease. [A Bush administration official] said U.S. intelligence is that bin Laden needs dialysis every three days and "it is fairly obvious that that could be an issue when you are running from place to place, and facing the idea of needing to generate electricity in a mountain hideout." [CNN] Renal dialysis -- talking about hemodialysis -- is something that really is reserved for patients in end-stage renal failure. That means their kidneys have just completely shut down. The most common cause of something like that would be something like diabetes and hypertension. Once that's happened, if you're separated from your dialysis machine -- and incidentally, dialysis machines require electricity, they're going to require clean water, they're going to require a sterile setting -- infection is a huge risk with that. If you don't have all those things and a functioning dialysis machine, it's unlikely that you'd survive beyond several days or a week at the most. [CNN] |
Do you think the Bin Laden family links to the Bush family have anything to do with him not being found?
A Bush administration official said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and were a threat to us all. So I don't put a lot of faith in anything that comes from "A Bush administration official". |
Who care,he is completly irrevelant in entire story.
|
He moved to Miami and drives a cab....
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Remeber that the way they caught Sadam was through disloyalty of someone who was supposed to be gaurding him. If Osama has a strictly loyal team behind him which is entirely possible, he could be hiding anywhere in the world and won't be found.
Just like any sort of criminal organistion, just like the mafia It often boils down to someone spilling the beans and ratting on everyone. |
I honestly believe he is dead.
I also believe the arabs thought it be better to pretend he is alive- rather than marter him and say hes dead- thats how idiotic they are. A real video showing he is alive and well would really be a slap in the US face- and prove that we are retarded when it comes to catching him. Hes dead folks. |
He's hanging out with the rest of his misunderstanders in Pakistan. Some of our GFY Islamic scholars should head over to help them realize the error of their ways.
Quote:
|
He'll be back when needed politically.
|
911 was an inside job WTC 7 is the smoking gun!
|
About 40 days before Bush leaves the white house, OSama will be grabbed. Or at least someone who looks like him. There will be a quickie trial in the country he is grabbed, he will put convicted, and put to death.
|
He's alive and well and living in Paris.
|
Quote:
|
I think he is somewhere getting fun with a couple of CIA guys..
...and some hot chicks, of course... |
Quote:
Are you kidding me? We were always at war with Eurasia! Is this thing on? Testing, testing.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The US didn't "start" the wars. The war with Iran started in 1979 when the US embassy was attacked by militants, including, some say, future Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. For decades, Iran has threatened our allies and sponsorred terrorism around the world. It is coming to a head now with Iran's recent aggressions. The war with Iraq started in 1990 when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. For 11 years the brutal dictator defied the UN and thumbed his nose at the world. Hussein also murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people. After the failure of the UN, GWB had the balls to stand up to Hussein and conduct a police action to remove him by force. 27 million people were freed. The war with Afghanistan started on 9/ 11/ 2001 when the Twin Towers were attacked by Bin Laden's organization, which was given shelter by the Taliban. Yes, Bin Laden is still on the run. The war against him is vital because it is an ideological war of Islamo-Fascism against freedom. It is a worldwide battle. |
Quote:
When it's time for McCain to get a boost in the polls, a new video of bin laden will emerge. Also gay marriage, flag burning, abortion and whatever other flavor of the day strikes the GOP's crazy fancy. |
Quote:
|
Hussein gassed the kurds years before he invaded Kuwait. Why didnt go and kill Hussein during the Gulf War? Why did president Bush the first say "The united states is not in the business of assasinating leaders"? Why did Swarzkoff sign an agreement with Iraqi military? Where was the moral outrage about him killing his own people when it actually mattered? Why did this argument pop up only after no WMD's were found, and vice Dick's lie about there being a link to al qeada was proven to be pure shit? lol christ on a crutch man..
Hussein was "bad", but he deserved a second chance? The reason all of that happened is that we didnt give a fuck that he was killing his own people obviously. Other countries kill their people all the fucking time and we dont give a shit. How many MILLIONS have to die in Africa before we go bomb them and kill their leaders? Wheres the morality argument now? Nonexistent as always is where. The US government CHOSE to send our troops into Iraq DESPITE the evidence that he had no WMD. They cherry picked the various reports from the region and highlighted only those things that would help "make the case" to go into Iraq. On September 11th 2001 (remember that day?), Donald Rumsfeld suggested that this was the time to go into Iraq. Is the argument now going to be that suddenly, miraculously, like a gift from God almighty, that on that day, the US government suddenly decided at long last to find morality and go get saddam? When Condi's report came in that those aluminum tubes were NOT SUITABLE for enriching uranium, she went on the air and repeated the famous lines that they were ONLY suitable for enriching uranium, and that we dont want the smoking gun to come in the form of a mushroom cloud. When she was caught in this on live tv YEARS later with the actual report stating they were *NOT SUITABLE* for enriching uranium, all she could do was stammer and state that she stands by her statement. She read the words "NOT SUITABLE" and said "ONLY SUITABLE". That my friends is called a lie. When Wilsons report came back that there was NO URANIUM being sought from Niger, the UNited States Government in our white house began a concerted effort to discredit Wilson, going so far as to out his covert CIA operative WIFES name in the newspapers! THAT my friends is called TREASON. Any idiot that believes anything coming out of this white house deserves to be called an idiot. And it's just as simple as that. Oh and in case you dont believe Rummy wanted this on sept. 11th, here's a bit of an article that was published FOUR YEARS AGO.. so maybe it's time you caught up: "With the intelligence all pointing toward bin Laden, Rumsfeld ordered the military to begin working on strike plans. And at 2:40 p.m., the notes quote Rumsfeld as saying he wanted "best info fast. Judge whether good enough hit S.H." ? meaning Saddam Hussein ? "at same time. Not only UBL" ? the initials used to identify Osama bin Laden. "Go massive," the notes quote him as saying. "Sweep it all up. Things related and not." " |
Quote:
The war with Iran could have started because of the Shah's 16 years of martial law and his support from the United States which then alienated a great percentage of the population... The war with Iraq could have started because Sadam believed the United States would not interfere with his invasion to Kuwait as the US was a major supporter of Iraq during its 8 year war with Iran... The war in Afghanistan could have started during its war with the Soviet Union, during which the (future) taliban rebels were supported with weapons from the CIA, although aid stopped once the Soviets finally pulled out.... Not saying I'm right, you're not, just saying that once you start going back, you can go as far as your points need you to. |
The most ridiculous comment I've heard, and it's been said many times, is that the "war on terror" is working because there hasn't been an attack inside the U.S. since 9/11 ...
Okay, but on 9/10 you could've said that there hadn't been attack since '92. :2cents |
|
Quote:
Now you guys might elect a President who hasn't even served two terms as a senator and has even worse credentials then Bush when it comes foreign policy but you expect a different outcome. Who will be pulling his strings? That honeymoon will be over quick! :1orglaugh |
|
Quote:
And I'm not comfortable at all with this newbie we're about to elect. But.. he's better than the oldbie who clearly has every intention of pandering to everyone he once stood firmly against. :helpme |
Oh geez my crap
|
he is in my place
|
base on cool1's analysis, perhaps it's true that he's dead!
|
it would be kind of hard to fight a "War on Terror" when the "Leader" has been "Caught , yaaaayyyyyyy we're safe " .... wouldn't it?
H E ' S S T I L L O U T T H E R E |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
osama might be dead I really hate how no one talks about him, was he just a scapegoat?
|
If Al Gore had been president this all that would of been talked about by the over 40 hrs a week of right wing pundits and at least 4 books on it. The left doesnt have that loud a voice. I cant for the fairness doctrine to come back.
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123