GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Baby faced Chastity available for shoots this weekend only! (PICS) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=843818)

Jim_Gunn 07-26-2008 01:22 AM

Baby faced Chastity available for shoots this weekend only! (PICS)
 
I don't often post samples, but this girl is one of my favorites. I flew Chastity in to work for me in a few projects this week and she is staying over through the weekend. Chastity just turned twenty, has blonde hair & blue eyes, is all natural and is a great model! I am supposed to be filming her in some more videos for my own company tomorrow, but Sunday is wide open right now. If any existing or new clients are interested, hit me up on icq and I can send pics of other girls or guys for her to shoot with. Chastity does boy-girl, girl-girl, solos, blow-jobs, hand-jobs and sybian rides. She is a perfect model for teen sites! Here are some dressed and naked pics, plus Chastity in a cheerleader outfit for my upcoming "Lesbian Cheerleader Squad 5" movie, as well as flipping the bird for GFY!


who 07-26-2008 01:42 AM

More like butt-faced

Vick! 07-26-2008 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 14510058)
More like butt-faced

:2 cents:

Tat2Jr 07-26-2008 05:31 AM

I SOOOOO wanted to work with her, and then clicked on her pic at the model agency and saw that huge ass tattoo. Yet another girl who I won't work with because of being dumb and tatting out. I wish girls knew how much work they missed out on because of tats and fake tans. :(

BTW - this isn't a diss in anyway. She's a cutie, and will do well.... I just won't shoot girls with tats (sometimes I let a tramp stamp or a small "female" tat through, but usually they just get dropped from the list).

Funniest thing about my post? - I use to be a tattoo artist.

blademaster16 07-26-2008 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 14510058)
More like butt-faced

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Scott McD 07-26-2008 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn (Post 14509912)

I'd bang that ass !!!!! :thumbsup

Mutt 07-26-2008 08:20 AM

i wondered what happened to that girl. i see she's gone the pornstar look now - a year ago she was total jailbait perfection - take a look at her in BarelyLegal mag and Nubiles.

Jim is she with an agency? She started out with that clown Eli.

why would you not shoot a girl with a tat? who sells more - Nikki Sims(NextDoorNikki) with the big tats still sells better than any other 'teen' solo girl

Jim_Gunn 07-26-2008 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 14511256)
i wondered what happened to that girl. i see she's gone the pornstar look now - a year ago she was total jailbait perfection - take a look at her in BarelyLegal mag and Nubiles.

Jim is she with an agency? She started out with that clown Eli.

why would you not shoot a girl with a tat? who sells more - Nikki Sims(NextDoorNikki) with the big tats still sells better than any other 'teen' solo girl

Tat2Jr, I agree about not being a fan of tattoos, but Chastity's tattoo to the side of her groin isn't that big, compared to many models, and no tramp stamp either. I have filmed a lot worse on girls! [Shrug]

Mutt, she goes to college full time in the North-west so she wasn't really working in porn for many months. I kept in contact with her ever since meeting her the first time she came through town over a year ago and flew her in special this week just for a few different projects. I don't know what you mean by the porn star look. She hasn't changed a thing since last year, except maybe the make up my artist put on her, he he. Unless you think she looks slightly older, but then again she started out looking like she could have been sixteen. :winkwink:

Mutt 07-26-2008 09:58 AM

it's just the makeup - here she is with a more natural look.

http://www.bratcash.com/gnd/lynn_1.jpg

http://www.bratcash.com/gnd/lynn_2.jpg

http://www.bratcash.com/gnd/lynn_3.jpg

http://www.bratcash.com/gnd/lynn_4.jpg

http://www.bratcash.com/gnd/lynn_5.jpg

http://www.bratcash.com/gnd/lynn_6.jpg

F-U-Jimmy 07-26-2008 10:05 AM

She's on Fox Models site, seems like she will be available in LA from 30th July to the 27th Aug.....
I agree with all the tat comments, i don't like them at all, but there are lots of models who don't have them

Mutt 07-26-2008 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by F-U-Jimmy (Post 14511610)
She's on Fox Models site, seems like she will be available in LA from 30th July to the 27th Aug.....
I agree with all the tat comments, i don't like them at all, but there are lots of models who don't have them

that's why doing solo girl paysites with girls with any connection to the LA porn industry is a waste of time - she'll make 25K in that month in LA - get totally overexposed - and making a few grand a month from a solo site won't keep her happy and she'll just go out to LA and Florida again and again

M0nk 07-26-2008 10:17 AM

freakin hot! I like her a lot!

Porno Dan 07-26-2008 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 14511618)
that's why doing solo girl paysites with girls with any connection to the LA porn industry is a waste of time - she'll make 25K in that month in LA - get totally overexposed - and making a few grand a month from a solo site won't keep her happy and she'll just go out to LA and Florida again and again


Can you blame a girl for wanting to go to LA and make more money?

The LA modeling agencies are getting better and better at recruiting. Friends of mine who work for them keep an eye out for new solo models just so they can track them down and have them come out and shoot.

Spunky 07-26-2008 10:52 AM

I'm digging her,she's a lil cutie

tranza 07-26-2008 11:00 AM

She's cute. Too bad she's got that huge tatoo on her.

CaptainHowdy 07-26-2008 11:03 AM

Too gorgeous for my taste... heh :winkwink:!

Mutt 07-26-2008 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porno Dan (Post 14511760)
Can you blame a girl for wanting to go to LA and make more money?

The LA modeling agencies are getting better and better at recruiting. Friends of mine who work for them keep an eye out for new solo models just so they can track them down and have them come out and shoot.

Most girls last in LA less than a month and never return - they go home with torn up vaginas, rectums, multiple STD's, sleeping with anybody the 'agent/pimp' wants them to

it's not a postive experience for most of them - they'd have been better off at home.

your friends must be desperate to be scouts for LA porn agencies - i've seen the finder's fees Goldstar and LA Direct pay - they are laughable.

tenletters 07-26-2008 11:19 AM

those pics are a hundred times better than the first ones posted. Please tell her not to ever take pics looking like a painted up haggerd gutter whore again.

oh and get her some wreckingbalm for that crappy tat.

Jim_Gunn 07-26-2008 11:20 AM

Mutt, hit me up, we haven't chatted in a long time and I wanted to bounce some ideas off you about solo girls including a couple of specific cases.

Mutt 07-26-2008 11:27 AM

k just sent you a 'hey' :)

Ross 07-26-2008 11:30 AM

Take the make up off her.

Jim_Gunn 07-26-2008 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tenletters (Post 14511896)
those pics are a hundred times better than the first ones posted. Please tell her not to ever take pics looking like a painted up haggerd gutter whore again.

Puh-lease... a few of the pics Mutt posted weren't even that flattering for her, barely any makeup at all and pretty amateurish style photography. I know that sells too, but calling her haggard (not haggerd) because she had a little more glammed up makeup is pretty ridiculous. Typical GFY nitwit who exaggerates wildly to make a point and badly at that... :321GFY

Mutt 07-26-2008 11:56 AM

the pics i posted of her were shot for ATK by a pretty crappy photographer - the last one i think was off the tour of NastyDollars Pure18 paysite

Deej 07-26-2008 12:06 PM

Cute n natural :thumbsup

pornask 07-26-2008 12:24 PM

She's incredibly cute. Would love a set of self taken pic of her :)

DamageX 07-26-2008 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 14510058)
More like butt-faced

Yay, she can do anal two ways!

Porno Dan 07-26-2008 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 14511875)
Most girls last in LA less than a month and never return - they go home with torn up vaginas, rectums, multiple STD's, sleeping with anybody the 'agent/pimp' wants them to

it's not a postive experience for most of them - they'd have been better off at home.

your friends must be desperate to be scouts for LA porn agencies - i've seen the finder's fees Goldstar and LA Direct pay - they are laughable.



The agencies themselves have people that work in their office looking up and tracking down new models.

The average girl working for LA Direct makes between $6,000 to $15,000 per month and they stay with them, again on average for 18 months.

While I will agree that some girls have a bad experience in Los Angeles, on average they are going to make a lot more shooting and working in LA than anywhere else.

marcop 07-26-2008 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porno Dan (Post 14512365)
The average girl working for LA Direct makes between $6,000 to $15,000 per month and they stay with them, again on average for 18 months.

This may have been true a couple years ago, but it's not true today. Sure, when a girl first gets in the biz, if she's really hot, she'll make good money. But there's far less work right now than I've ever seen--in 10 years of shooting porn in LA.

I've had a lot of male and female talent call me over the past few months, looking for work--I guess they pass directors' phone numbers around--including two LA Direct girls, which is kinda funny as I haven't used LA Direct for over five years. And girls are also much more willing to work around their agency, even though they might be under an exclusive contract.

And talent rates are going down: I share my office with an agent, and a lot of producers/directors are starting to lower what they're offering talent. One very well known and successful director now offers a girl $600 for a b/g scene initially. He'll go up to $700 but won't go any higher--and girls are going for it.

Porno Dan 07-26-2008 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marcop (Post 14512455)
This may have been true a couple years ago, but it's not true today. Sure, when a girl first gets in the biz, if she's really hot, she'll make good money. But there's far less work right now than I've ever seen--in 10 years of shooting porn in LA.

I've had a lot of male and female talent call me over the past few months, looking for work--I guess they pass directors' phone numbers around--including two LA Direct girls, which is kinda funny as I haven't used LA Direct for over five years. And girls are also much more willing to work around their agency, even though they might be under an exclusive contract.

And talent rates are going down: I share my office with an agent, and a lot of producers/directors are starting to lower what they're offering talent. One very well known and successful director now offers a girl $600 for a b/g scene initially. He'll go up to $700 but won't go any higher--and girls are going for it.



These are current, as of last month's numbers for an AVERAGE girl at LA Direct. Some girls make less, and are willing to take the chance of being fired by booking themselves directly.

I agree that a lot of the traditional DVD based studios have slowed down their production, but by the same measure so have some of the largest subscription based sites. It is not just LA where production has slowed down, it is the entire adult industry. I for one, sincerely hope that the prices that some of these girls charge for scenes falls

pornguy 07-26-2008 01:26 PM

She is nice looking, and if you are into girls with samll tits then she is pretty ok, but when you get to the tattoo, there went the all natural to typical tramp stamp slut.

Jim_Gunn 07-26-2008 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 14512520)
She is nice looking, and if you are into girls with samll tits then she is pretty ok, but when you get to the tattoo, there went the all natural to typical tramp stamp slut.

FWIW, when people refer to "tramp stamps" they are usually talking specifically about the the tats above their ass which this model does not have. Tattoos elsewhere on the body are just bad tattoos. :2 cents:

Porno Dan 07-26-2008 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn (Post 14512556)
FWIW, when people refer to "tramp stamps" they are usually talking specifically about the the tats above their ass which this model does not have. Tattoos elsewhere on the body are just bad tattoos. :2 cents:

Nice choice in a model, she looks fresh, isn't shot out, and must do a decent scene if you are shooting for mutiple sites.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123