![]() |
Met Art has 39 megapixel images now!
I was reading through the week's sponsor emails and I saw this:
Quote:
http://img247.imagevenue.com/loc568/..._122_568lo.jpg Please drop like $500 on a set of these so I can actually see what you're shooting :( |
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
don't you know shadows aren't porn.. its art man, you know people pay good money to hang up that shit on their walls.. wait, they dont? fuck.. then what is art?? |
is there a met art rep here? i wanna know why they need 35 megapixels as thats mostly used for billboards.. is it legal for me to blow up met art pics and put them on billboards??
|
maybe i think they do that because they dont take closeup pussy shots, this way the end user can zoom in himself
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://hosted.met-art.com/met-art_LU..._LUH_104_8.jpg |
Quote:
im just a very bored person :1orglaugh |
|
atleast met-art has iga.. shes fucking hot :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
yup.. asshole is at the center point of photo.. which means it's art :-D
|
Quote:
|
look jay.. its a matter of averages ;)
|
Quote:
|
haha, my bad man
|
met might wanna take a look at this:
http://content.beeblog.nl/ |
Quote:
Better late then never ......ZING :1orglaugh:winkwink: |
Quote:
|
:D
really size |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
now you can see the ass pimples at that resolution
|
Quote:
|
that is one good SNATCH
:) |
Quote:
|
LOL :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Quote:
|
anyone has ICQ contact info for Metart ?
|
great pictures but 39 megapixels are they shooting billboards?
|
thats what im wondering.. can some photo experts come in here and explain why 39 megapixels are needed for internet porn?
|
Seems like a numbers bragging game to me... my 22" flat panel cant even display resolution half that high anyways... so i wonder why waste all that bandwidth when no one can actually see the quality...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Consumers are conditioned to assume more megapixels equals better quality, so this marketing gimmick may just work. :2 cents: |
where is the 39Mpixel sample?
|
how many MB may have those 39MPix images ?
|
Quote:
I just received the H3 D11-50 which uses the new Kodak 50 M-pixel sensor. Total overkill for web images as it produces files in Raw of 65 mgs and Tiff images as large as 150 megs. I can only imagine how long it would take to download a 50meg file using cheap bandwidth on a 56k modem !!!!! :helpme |
Quote:
|
woooowwwwww
|
Quote:
I bought a Canon 1DsII in 2005 and thought 16 was good... it's obsolete now... I love taking a picture of a detailed scene (eg a telephoto shot of a city street from a lookout) and then wandering around the image at 100% zoom, you see stuff you'd never notice otherwise. That would be fun with a 50MP sensor. :pimp |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123