GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who Makes More? Site Owners or Affiliates? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=848496)

mahoney 08-17-2008 12:15 AM

Who Makes More? Site Owners or Affiliates?
 
I have heard both sides of this argument but it's been a few years...
What say you?:pimp

BV 08-17-2008 01:22 AM

some site owners make more than some affiliates and some affiliates make more than some site owners

i'm pretty sure i have quite a few affiliates that make more than i do

fallenmuffin 08-17-2008 02:02 AM

Site owners differently have a leg up but they're overhead is insane. Dedicated servers, bandwidth, content, designs, video editing and formatting, etc. etc.

With an affiliate $19.95/mo for hosting and you can make unlimited income.

It just depends on the person.

mahoney 08-17-2008 02:02 AM

yeah...but it's almost like a Casino ...right? Isn't the "house" always supposed to win?

blademaster16 08-17-2008 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fallenmuffin (Post 14619769)
Site owners differently have a leg up but they're overhead is insane. Dedicated servers, bandwidth, content, designs, video editing and formatting, etc. etc.

With an affiliate $19.95/mo for hosting and you can make unlimited income.

It just depends on the person.

Agree :thumbsup

seeandsee 08-17-2008 02:15 AM

In global owner makes more when he collect $$$ form every affiliate.

mahoney 08-17-2008 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee (Post 14619797)
In global owner makes more when he collect $$$ form every affiliate.

can you say that in English?

plsureking 08-17-2008 02:23 AM

yea paysite overhead is crazy.
affiliates usually earn half for not doing much.
(compared to the work of the site owner)

a smart hard working affiliate
with a background in marketing
and that wants to do more than just
copy everyone else will make bank.

look at the hun.
one of the web's first millionaires.
didnt own any pay sites..

fallenmuffin 08-17-2008 02:34 AM

A better question is how much is the average paysite owner profiting monthly? I'm not talking the mega networks but the average ccbill or small paysite owner?

GigoloShawn 08-17-2008 02:37 AM

Aggregate? The Affiliates. Invariably. Fallenmuffin has nailed it on the head.

fastboy 08-17-2008 05:23 AM

this is really interesting question, bump for more opinions

The Duck 08-17-2008 05:31 AM

Impossible to say.

GetSCORECash 08-17-2008 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fallenmuffin (Post 14619769)
Site owners differently have a leg up but they're overhead is insane. Dedicated servers, bandwidth, content, designs, video editing and formatting, etc. etc.

With an affiliate $19.95/mo for hosting and you can make unlimited income.

It just depends on the person.

The Big Affiliates have servers, pay for bandwidth, design, video editing and formatting. Not at the scale of the site owners, but they put in a lot of work.

They even have staff...!

Klen 08-17-2008 07:24 AM

Site owners in mosts cases.

IllTestYourGirls 08-17-2008 07:34 AM

like everything "it depends" some make more some dont. many programs start and fail, many affiliates start and fail.

BVF 08-17-2008 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fallenmuffin (Post 14619835)
A better question is how much is the average paysite owner profiting monthly? I'm not talking the mega networks but the average ccbill or small paysite owner?

What matters is what YOU make.....I don't give a fuck how much someone else makes.....

notoldschool 08-17-2008 09:08 AM

Most site owners worth a salt are affiliates as well.

Lykos 08-17-2008 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 14619732)
some site owners make more than some affiliates and some affiliates make more than some site owners

i'm pretty sure i have quite a few affiliates that make more than i do

Very good answer :thumbsup

woj 08-17-2008 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 14619732)
some site owners make more than some affiliates and some affiliates make more than some site owners

i'm pretty sure i have quite a few affiliates that make more than i do

:thumbsup

gleem 08-17-2008 11:27 AM

well since I am my own biggest affiliate, I get the best of both worlds :)

LeRoy 08-17-2008 11:36 AM

I would have to say. Paysite owners.

Sales without refcodes come in. So they go to the house account.

bbm 08-17-2008 11:46 AM

Site owners get 50% share minimum, affiliates get much less

VicD 08-17-2008 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kandah (Post 14620100)
Impossible to say.


I agree on that

mx8829 08-17-2008 11:56 AM

site owners

Zuzana Designs 08-17-2008 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF (Post 14620527)
What matters is what YOU make.....I don't give a fuck how much someone else makes.....

Well said !!!!!

Jensen 08-17-2008 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbm (Post 14621240)
Site owners get 50% share minimum, affiliates get much less

You mean that the other way round right? Affiliates get 50% share minimum and owners have to pay everything from content to processing fees..

BV 08-17-2008 12:28 PM

it doesn't take rocket science to figure out that site owners make less per transaction than the affiliate that sent the sale

and on the same token it's very easy to figure out that some affiliates that send me a few sales a every day also send a few sales every day to a 100 other programs.

these affiliates run big link lists tgps review sites etc etc.... and are the 10% of your affiliate base that makes 90% of your sales

Cherry7 08-17-2008 12:43 PM

Our affiliates have a good deal...50% of the cash and we pay for everything else from making the movies to the hosting....

But the more affiliates we get the unit costs go down so at a certain point it can be profitable.

The problem for the affiliates is how they generate the traffic to send and how they keep their visitors happy without spending too much on content....

The sites that were first on the block have the upper hand

polle54 08-17-2008 01:03 PM

there are more affiliates than there are owners.

Owners earn a lot more in a global perspective. However some affiliates do quite well for themselves :)

fuzebox 08-17-2008 01:07 PM

How long is a piece of string?

BSleazy 08-17-2008 01:41 PM

The bigger well known pay sites I'm sure get TONS of type ins and se traffic. I'm betting there's lots of errors and cookie deleting type things where the affiliates lose out on sales too. Affiliate code tracking isn't going to work 100% of the time.

Cherry7 08-18-2008 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCyber (Post 14621637)
The bigger well known pay sites I'm sure get TONS of type ins and se traffic. I'm betting there's lots of errors and cookie deleting type things where the affiliates lose out on sales too. Affiliate code tracking isn't going to work 100% of the time.

The cookies are valid for 3 days... and it takes a long time to get SE traffic in such a competative market... I think very few get lost...

Of course a lot of punters bookmark and come back months later....but on the other hand affiliates get 50% of rebill too..

So I think they get a pretty good deal....

Pornopat 08-18-2008 11:06 AM

The top earners are the smart paysites.
When the surfer becomes a member they are the ones that can start milking in all sorts of ways.
That is why paysite owners are the best affiliates....
:2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123