New bigger banner from Jon Clark, what you guys think?
 

http://www.xxxcamhost.com/486x80.gif

I got a discount cause I enlarged the order :)

What you guy's think?

It just keeps getting worse.

I know yer $5 per banner but fuck commonn Jon!

looks good.....

Your Avitar lookjs like a Tranny...:1orglaugh


Nice looking Banner Jon:2 cents:

Looks very amateur. My flips can do a better job than his.

Wow I just looked at vanitycash.com on my 21" lcds..

And I thought the low quality graphics looked bad on my MBP screen..

WOW! Fix that shit rofl.

Um obviously your uhmm "FLIPS" can not. Your sig banner sucks nuts.

You're just biased, and jealous. Inferior pathetic little man.

i made that banner.

LIES! YTou are Canadian and everyone knows Canadians do not have FLIPS!:1orglaugh
Nor Huge cocks!

Why is Jon Clark's name is so many dumn threads?

:helpme:helpme :thumbsup

Are you going to make a thread for every banner you get made?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Pretty good...

Is Jon Clark the Paris Hilton of GFY or something? Everyone is obsessed with him.

Someone said Flips?

:hi:hi:hi

I might consider it now that you mention it :1orglaugh

Nono, this was cheaper if you split it out :winkwink:

The banner is better than the vast majority out there... why? Because it's effective at advertising the site.. How many fucking banners are out there that loop around spewing crap and you have to wait forever to even see the name of the site... Asthetics mean shit if the banner doesn't communicate well...

Looks pretty good on my Sony Artisan ..... :2 cents:

I use FF and it looks like a child made it, i.e. it looks like Shit!!!!

This is the correct response.

I think it sucks, just like Jon Clark and his crappy design company... SUCKS!



btw, he paid $25 for both banners...




The only way to get banners for $5 bucks a piece is to order 100 at a time...

This is my meaning too. We don't have a affiliate ref program yet so no need for 20 different banners. If I wanted something that gives seizures I would have ordered that.

I actually like the banners. They're clear and to the point with simple animations and easy to read text.

I agree. It looks fine to me and it conveys the pertinent information.

Webmasters do not need flashy looks and sexy pictures... they need information. I feel that flash is particularly bad for webmaster advertising because obviously webmasters are pretty Web savvy and many have flash disabled. I've had flash disabled for probably five years now.

Ya, sorry, didn't see that Klaze missed a "1" before the 5 in my quote above.

Doesnt look to bad.
I only say that because i like Nicky..

As an aside... Great self promotion here... Take controversal Jon Clark, throw in a peer review of some affiliate program banners done by said drama boy and you get ... "not so obvious" exposure for your program.. nice move...

Jon is obviously paying someone to start these threads.

I highly doubt nicky is on his payroll..

decent banner, happy birthday:D

It's a decent banner though. Looks clean.

No, but I am going to start charging people royalties...

I like you too Jens lol

Nah man, me just having some fun :)

Banner looks ok... but your live feeds and iframes, now those look fucking amazing. Who did those?

I like the banners you have for vanity cash. plus 50% on cams, I mean come on who the hell cant make money with this?

Our programers. :)

hahaha nice

Smooth animated banners with a nice clean feel to them.

Out of curiosity, how many new affiliates you picked-up from your innovative spam on the two banner threads? :)

nice, clean banner

It looks pretty good to me :thumbsup

I like it :thumbsup

172k filesize is a bit excessive.
and what kind of weird width for a banner is 486px?

looks decent though.

If it scrolled any slower, I could take a piss between 'not waiting for it to finish' moments

Jon Clark is a idiot... Anyone that buys his crappy outsourced designs is a idiot... Jon Clark should go fuck himself..

Not much slower than your trafficgigolos banner actually :winkwink:

i guess It's the many frames that does it. Still get's the message through IMO