Bill O'Reilly's interview of OBAMA was really ....
 

... pretty good .

And, no pun intended, it was fair and balanced.

Bill earns some points with that interview :thumbsup

Too bad Cavuto, Hannity and Laura Ingraham cannot do journalism ....

was definitely a very good interview and i would say the hardest interview of Obamas career....

I hope they play it straight through over the weekend...

O Rielly is a shit eating fuck case.

i want to see jon stewart and colbert get her and not hold back.

I haven't watched all of it yet, just the 1st two parts.....I think it was less than fair (go figure)

Ask all the tough questions you want, and ask all the follow up questions you want if you don't get a good enough answer....but for god's sake let the man finish answering before you butt in and give your own opinion or try to put words in his mouth.
It was supposed to be an interview, not a debate where O'reilly got to be both the moderator and the opposition.

Obama handled himself just fine and kept his trademark cool intact.....unlike me who would have either bitch slapped him, told him off, walked off the set, or all 3.

of course it was going to be fair. Obama met with the owner and the head of fox news before hand.

He was allowed only 30 minutes for the interview..
so he was basically forced to interrupt to move it forward..
every simple question doesn't need a 20 minute canned answer.

Bill O'Reilly's and "good interview" usually doesn't go together. But Fuck it, we'll do it live!

Indeed... all he tried to do during the interviews was to try to put words in Obama's mouth....I call BS on that........I still have to watch the third part tho... anyone has a link???? ...

"Fuck it, we'll do it live!" >>> priceless :thumbsup:1orglaugh

It was 30 minutes on air....the actual interview time was probably alot more than that.

Also, we're not talking about cutting off a 20 minute canned answer....he interrupted within 10 seconds of Obama starting to answer.....when Obama basically didn't say "You're right Bill I suck" and tried to explain his position, he was cut off.

To be fair to O'reilly, he did knock it off alot at the end, and it got more civil than it was at the beginning, but still alot more tense than it had to be.
You can ask tough questions without being a dick and you can do an interview without commentary. The guy has an hour a night to run his own mouth, you think he'd want to let Obama talk in the limited time he had.

Cavuto, Hannity and Ingraham arent journalist, they are pundits.

You must not know the difference which is not surprising.

were the questions pre-arranged and was o`reilly simply tring to get shorter answers as opposed to what a politician normally does when asked a question - 20 minure ramble?

I want to see McCain get interviewed by Olberman. Fuck it or let Palin do it. HAHA.

theres a special kind of hell for guys like Bill O
 

propaganda smear monger motherfucker will get his

Oh man I just lost like 3 hours going thru all of the Bill O'Reilly vids on youtube..

He really is fucking bonkers.. He's like a Franck or an Amp or an AlienQ...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You are like a piece a plywood: cheap, hard and dumb.

They call themselves and try to pass as journalist... They even complain that journalism is dead except for them.

O'Reilly is so good... Do you know how hard it is to be that much of a dick, for so long?

they probably hugged and ate cookies off set. :1orglaugh

Perhaps Bill is coming over to the light side?

O'Rielly is really good to watch, and while he obviously is right wing, he does do a great hard hitting interview.

Though you have to admit that Obama handled him very very well :) Big ups to both Bill and Obama... very good interview.

Show me a clip or quote where any of them have said straight out they are journalist.

And journalism is dead in the US...its few and far between of the news reporters of old.

AS a philipino to look it up for you ...

wow.... I was actually able to dance to that tune :) :thumbsup :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I think you are wrong. O'Reilly does, no doubt, have some political beliefs which he is legitimately concerned for, but more or less O'Reilly is about himself, about making money and about furthering his own agenda, increasing his audience base, etc.

O'Reilly for one knows that regardless of who is elected to the white house the direction in which America is heading is already more or less defined by the lobbyists, by the special interests. As much as Obama might want to resolve the Palestinian issue, I urge you (if you actually care) to go read up on how much his views in the space of a single year have changed on the issue, and how he completely re-invented himself in front of AIPAC in order to get their approval - which is necessary. Whoever is elected, will follow the script on ME policy, on foreign policy in general, there is 0 doubt about that, and O'Reilly is smart enough to know that. Sure some minor things may change, but more or less O'Reilly knows the system will always head in the same direction.

Secondly, O'Reilly right now knows that he is being introduced to a new audience again, those who like Obama, so he has gone out of his way to appear fair, in the hope that the sheep in the crowd start actually thinking O'Reilly is actually some straight talking, stand up guy - which he is not. He is a neo-con cunt, who (like the whole neo-con movement) helps drain the last ounce of American resistance and patriotism left and directs it in a self-destructing and totally non-beneficial direction to the appeasement of his Zionist and neo-con overlords. Him and his ilk are the biggest traitors America has, whatever way you paint it, at least the leftist, globalist, pacifist morons legitimately think they are doing some good.

I'm asking you to look it up you liar, your the one making the claim they they said it...so show proof. The fact is you cant show proof because they never said it. So what you said is a out right fabrication of the truth and a lie.

What a fucking clown you are.

I think having "O'Reilly vs Obama" on the screen pretty much summed it up. As if one is the good guy fighting the bad guy.

And that is about how clueless the American public is. Good guy vs bad guy. What are we 10?