GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Vivid Drops PornoTube Lawsuit Alleging Piracy (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=863348)

xbizdon 10-20-2008 04:39 PM

Vivid Drops PornoTube Lawsuit Alleging Piracy
 
XBIZ REPORT: Vivid Entertainment Group on Monday dropped its lawsuit against AEBN that alleged company division PornoTube.com and parent company Data Conversions Inc. pirated its adult properties.

http://www.xbiz.com/news/100701

garce 10-20-2008 04:42 PM

Collusion, I tell you!

The Duck 10-20-2008 04:44 PM

cliff notes? why did they drop it

brassmonkey 10-20-2008 04:45 PM

they can re file the case maybe the attorney saw something

Zorgman 10-20-2008 07:35 PM

maybe they will join them. Iv seen it happen, your not going to win so partner up with them.

tony286 10-20-2008 07:37 PM

where is gideon? lol

Barefootsies 10-20-2008 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14928696)
where is gideon? lol

My thought exactly.


TheDoc 10-20-2008 07:54 PM

Just amazing if you ask me.......

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=791149

Fat Panda 10-20-2008 07:57 PM

what the fuck

FreeHugeMovies 10-20-2008 08:43 PM

Like I said. This was all "Smoke and Mirrors" type shit.

Jens Van Assterdam 10-20-2008 09:23 PM

Bronation. According to wikipedia, youporn and pornotube have the same ownership.....bronation....bronation......bronatio n...

Abbie 10-20-2008 10:43 PM

Interesting turn of events. I wonder if Vivid will issue a press release on the matter.

wootpr0n 10-20-2008 11:17 PM

I'm not surprised. Vivid never had a case and they knew it.

They only filed the suit in an attempt to scare PornoTube into complying, or force them to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars defending themselves.

But it didn't work, and it wasn't worth the cost for Vivid.

Plus another court dismissed the Io vs Veoh case a couple of months ago, and that was practically the same thing. Veoh was accused of having infringing porn, some of which had copyright notices in them.

The Court said:
-they have a DMCA policy and respond to notices
-they are not required to spot check videos, and if they do, it doesn't constitute "actual knowledge" of infringement
-they can feature some infringing videos on their homepage and it doesn't constitute "actual knowledge" of infringement
-they can deal with users who upload infringing content any way they want
-a copyright notice is meaningless - Veoh doesn't have to watch the video, and even if they did it would still be meaningless
-and nobody can figure out what is copyrighted vs what isn't anyways because some user submitted content can be professionally produced, and some copyrighted content can be deliberately filmed to look like amateur

I think that Vivid knew about this decision. It would have been an easy defence for PornoTube (and will be for any other Tube site).

pornlaw 10-21-2008 01:19 AM

Not surprised by this at all. And this is the lawsuit that Cambria called "ground breaking." If my sources are correct ... wait to you see who will be doing a seminar together ... very shortly...

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 10-21-2008 02:58 AM

I told ya guys when this happened Vivid would drop the situation then join them.

SHit like this is clear as day to me. SHouldnt be a surprise folks.

seeandsee 10-21-2008 04:28 AM

Sky is falling

gideongallery 10-21-2008 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wootpr0n (Post 14929222)
I'm not surprised. Vivid never had a case and they knew it.

They only filed the suit in an attempt to scare PornoTube into complying, or force them to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars defending themselves.

But it didn't work, and it wasn't worth the cost for Vivid.

Plus another court dismissed the Io vs Veoh case a couple of months ago, and that was practically the same thing. Veoh was accused of having infringing porn, some of which had copyright notices in them.

The Court said:
-they have a DMCA policy and respond to notices
-they are not required to spot check videos, and if they do, it doesn't constitute "actual knowledge" of infringement
-they can feature some infringing videos on their homepage and it doesn't constitute "actual knowledge" of infringement
-they can deal with users who upload infringing content any way they want
-a copyright notice is meaningless - Veoh doesn't have to watch the video, and even if they did it would still be meaningless
-and nobody can figure out what is copyrighted vs what isn't anyways because some user submitted content can be professionally produced, and some copyrighted content can be deliberately filmed to look like amateur

I think that Vivid knew about this decision. It would have been an easy defence for PornoTube (and will be for any other Tube site).

beat me too it.

Agent 488 10-21-2008 06:27 AM

vividtube.com


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc