GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   SE Question. static vs templates (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=868323)

Fucksakes 11-10-2008 02:03 PM

SE Question. static vs templates
 
Does it matter if I load my pages with a php template..

index.php?alison

or better to have real pages?

/pornstar/a/alison/

hopfully this isnt a stupid question.

onlymovies 11-10-2008 02:06 PM

/please/bend/over/for/me/sweetie/

d-null 11-10-2008 02:08 PM

google came out and said recently that it prefers that people don't mod rewrite url's and that it would possibly be better for your search results if you didn't rewrite

Fucksakes 11-10-2008 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onlymovies (Post 15032453)
/please/bend/over/for/me/sweetie/

your still alive? thought the new kids in your life would have you dead by now.

J.P. 11-10-2008 02:14 PM

d-null, this is not exactly what they said :) All they said is that you can do more harm with poorly rewritten URLs than if you just live them as they were. But yes, they wrote this in such a misleading way :)

pornguy 11-10-2008 02:15 PM

Take what the people from google tell you with a grain of salt..

d-null 11-10-2008 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J.P. (Post 15032506)
d-null, this is not exactly what they said :) All they said is that you can do more harm with poorly rewritten URLs than if you just live them as they were. But yes, they wrote this in such a misleading way :)

guess we should try to find the link so that everyone can interpret it as they like, but it seemed to me when I read it that they were responding to the fact that so many people worry about mod rewriting wordpress urls to supposedly be more search engine friendly and they were trying to put the point across that it didn't make any difference.... I could have misinterpreted their intention though

Super Negro 11-10-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15032546)
guess we should try to find the link so that everyone can interpret it as they like, but it seemed to me when I read it that they were responding to the fact that so many people worry about mod rewriting wordpress urls to supposedly be more search engine friendly and they were trying to put the point across that it didn't make any difference.... I could have misinterpreted their intention though

idiots.....google also constantly tells people misleading and wrong info to get them to do what they want

farkedup 11-10-2008 02:40 PM

google isn't the ONLY search engine.... if you really want in good with all search engines you won't use "templates" you'll just have all the CONTENT without pretty looks :)

Jdoughs 11-10-2008 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farkedup (Post 15032717)
google isn't the ONLY search engine.

It may not be the only search engine but its the only one with traffic AND the only one worth mentioning.

Anyone with serps on all 3 can see this.

roly 11-10-2008 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15032473)
google came out and said recently that it prefers that people don't mod rewrite url's and that it would possibly be better for your search results if you didn't rewrite


i've not seen that, how can it tell if a url is rewritten?

BSleazy 11-10-2008 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15032546)
guess we should try to find the link so that everyone can interpret it as they like, but it seemed to me when I read it that they were responding to the fact that so many people worry about mod rewriting wordpress urls to supposedly be more search engine friendly and they were trying to put the point across that it didn't make any difference.... I could have misinterpreted their intention though


Matt Cutts is using mod rewrite for his wordpress blog.

%postname%

:2 cents:

Agent 488 11-10-2008 03:38 PM

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogsp...atic-urls.html

pornguy 11-10-2008 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCyber (Post 15032928)
Matt Cutts is using mod rewrite for his wordpress blog.

%postname%

:2 cents:

Exactly what I said. Dont believe everything they say. Take it with a grain of salt

J.P. 11-10-2008 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15032546)
guess we should try to find the link so that everyone can interpret it as they like, but it seemed to me when I read it that they were responding to the fact that so many people worry about mod rewriting wordpress urls to supposedly be more search engine friendly and they were trying to put the point across that it didn't make any difference.... I could have misinterpreted their intention though

Somebody up there just posted a link to it. I think the main problem is people are reading this party only:

Quote:

Does that mean I should avoid rewriting dynamic URLs at all?
That's our recommendation, ...
But obviously they should read on:

Quote:

... unless your rewrites are limited to removing unnecessary parameters, or you are very diligent in removing all parameters that could cause problems.
In the article there are a few examples of poorly rewritten URLs which could cause crawling problems.

A comment to this article that I like very much is this one:

Quote:

Ready for the controversy? I think this is a ridiculous article coming from you guys! To say we shouldn't rewrite URLs because we may rewrite irresponsibly. Seriously?

That is like saying people shouldn't drive because if you do it wrong, you may cause an accident. Come on. ...
I couldn't agree more, what about you?

chaze 11-10-2008 05:12 PM

Google likes html static pages over active but also likes updated original content. So if you can update your site weekly with a static page then that would be the best. But in reality active is needed to keep the site active.

Fucksakes 11-10-2008 06:07 PM

thanks for the info.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123