SteveHardeman |
12-15-2008 12:55 PM |
Huh, you guys really see a difference in ratios for programs that use CCBill versus programs that use NATS or whatever else is out there? I don't but I'm small potatoes on traffic generation. Most of my money comes from my paysite.
Someone smarter then me(pretty much everyone on here) want to explain to me what difference the processor makes? Besides the different cascading resources. I know it makes a difference but I would think it would be an immaterial difference.
Quote:
To be honest? not all - pretty much only CCbill programs and datingsites (think that is because its getting saturated)
|
I don't know anything about dating sites, but I don't see what billing thru CCBill has to do with content being saturated. In fact, I may argue the other way around. That the big programs running NATS, in my opinion, aren't as on top of the tubes running their full videos. Whereas us small guys on CCBill stay on top of that stuff. And also, the big sites paying $100 PPS, they''ve got tons of webmasters spewing links all over the place versus most of us CCBill guys building up revshare sign-ups.
If I were to find out affiliates aren't promoting my site cuz I'm on CCBill, and I'll drop CCBill like a bad habit. Or at least add NATS as an option. Without affiliates, I'm dead in the water.
Oh, and also, for the record, I do not like poo!!!! Especially after the anal scene I shot last week. Not a pretty sight.
|