GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Scarlett Johansson Wins ScarlettJohansson.com (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=878346)

fris 12-29-2008 08:29 AM

Scarlett Johansson Wins ScarlettJohansson.com
 
Actress Scarlett Johansson has won rights to the domain name ScarlettJohansson.com in an arbitration decision at World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Johansson has starred in numerous movies including Lost in Translation, Match Point, and The Ghost Whisperer and been nominated for several Golden Globe Awards.

The details of the domain name arbitration case are rather interesting. Apparently the owner of the domain, Tristan Dare, set up a contest on the site that invited people to win a shot at a ?threesome? with Johansson. However, the threesome was actually just the chance to go to Johansson?s movie Vicky, Cristina, Barcelona with two other people. Contestants had to send an e-mail explaining why they should be the winner.

As an indication of how much traffic the domain received, Dare said the site had 100,000 visits over 4 days and 10,000 people entered the contest. It also received media attention.

Johansson had nothing to do with the contest, but Dare said an ?anonymous? person e-mailed him offering $10,000 to run a campaign promoting the movie. When Dare declined, he claims the person offered $20,000. He said he wouldn?t take money because he?s an artist, but created the site as a parody for non-commercial gain. Dare didn?t provide the e-mails to the WIPO panel.

source: http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/24...m-domain-name/

cardinalvices 12-29-2008 08:31 AM

Omg how could it happened? She has nothing to do with this domain name, isn't she? :)

HorseShit 12-29-2008 08:32 AM

domain squatters will be punished

The Duck 12-29-2008 08:43 AM

He fucked that up didnt he.

FreeHugeMovies 12-29-2008 09:00 AM

bad news for the idiot trying to sell terapatrick.net or whatever that domain was.

pornlaw 12-29-2008 09:07 AM

If he set it up as nothing more than a fan site he probably could have kept it.

There was probably some sort of commercial gain to the site.

I would be interested in the details....

czarina 12-29-2008 09:17 AM

he should've said YES to the $20,000. Now he has no money and no domain. Moronic artists!

ffmihai 12-29-2008 09:47 AM

nice read

CaptainHowdy 12-29-2008 10:48 AM

More POWA to the WIPO!

JP-pornshooter 12-29-2008 10:56 AM

strange to me also.. i mean her stage name is nothing more than a trade marked / copyrighted legal article, how could she be entitled to the url?
Is there legal precedence for this?

lazycash 12-29-2008 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina (Post 15257092)
he should've said YES to the $20,000. Now he has no money and no domain. Moronic artists!

Agreed, hell I would have just taken the 20k and said here's the domain to do with what you please.

96ukssob 12-29-2008 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 15257411)
Agreed, hell I would have just taken the 20k and said here's the domain to do with what you please.

for sure, what an idiot. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Violetta 12-29-2008 11:06 AM

strange...

Iron Fist 12-29-2008 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kandah (Post 15256991)
He fucked that up didnt he.

By not providing the e-mails to WIPO that he declined financial gain, he probably would of won! So the story is probably bullshit, he knew he would lose the domain and probably made a shitload of cash off of it already anyways. :2 cents:

John-ACWM 12-29-2008 02:42 PM

I love her anyway :winkwink:

kane 12-29-2008 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 15257410)
strange to me also.. i mean her stage name is nothing more than a trade marked / copyrighted legal article, how could she be entitled to the url?
Is there legal precedence for this?

It seems like if you are famous and someone owns the domain of your name you can get it back. If this domain was owned by someone who had the same name then she probably would have lost the case, but stars can make the argument that someone else is using their name to profit from or to generate business and that they should not be allowed to do that.

It really is no different than if you owned pepsi.com and had some ads on it or had anything at all that could either generate you income or exposure. Pepsi could then say you are using their name for some form of gain.

There is a long list of celebs who have fought for and gotten their domains back from other people. Madonna was even able to get madonna.com back.

Like someone else said if it was just a fan site with no income the guy probably would have won as well, but since it wasn't and the domain's owner isn't also named Scarlett Johansson it would be hard for him to argue that he wasn't trading on her name.

pornlaw 12-29-2008 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 15258659)
It seems like if you are famous and someone owns the domain of your name you can get it back. If this domain was owned by someone who had the same name then she probably would have lost the case, but stars can make the argument that someone else is using their name to profit from or to generate business and that they should not be allowed to do that.

It really is no different than if you owned pepsi.com and had some ads on it or had anything at all that could either generate you income or exposure. Pepsi could then say you are using their name for some form of gain.

There is a long list of celebs who have fought for and gotten their domains back from other people. Madonna was even able to get madonna.com back.

Like someone else said if it was just a fan site with no income the guy probably would have won as well, but since it wasn't and the domain's owner isn't also named Scarlett Johansson it would be hard for him to argue that he wasn't trading on her name.

100% correct ... and if the name is a stage name and its trademarked, the infringer could be looking at a Anti-Cybersquatting claim as well as a trademark infringement claim...

That was the approach we took in the Devinn Lane infringement case...

http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece....&q=devinn+lane

sortie 12-29-2008 08:02 PM

Not really news, if a well know person who profits from their name wants the
domain with their name then they will get it.

If you buy TomCruise.com then sell it for any decent offer before you get slammed.

TidalWave 12-29-2008 08:03 PM

it said arbitration ... so it was mutually agreed

D Ghost 12-29-2008 10:27 PM

good for her

Barefootsies 12-29-2008 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdavis (Post 15256959)
domain squatters will be punished

This is called, sweet justice.
:pimp

LiveDose 12-29-2008 10:29 PM

Damn I love her tits.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc