Interesting news maybe for 2257?
 

I just heard Obama has already holted all pending regulations put in place under the Bush admin. I wonder if that would effect the 2257 regulation that went into effect today?

I fucking hope so!

Source please, considering that the man was JUST sworn in 7 hours ago, and then went to the parade, that just ended 10 mins ago, and is now heading to 10 balls.

His actual "Work" don't start till 2morrow.


-Loki-

This is a pretty common thing with a new incoming president. don't be surprised if he makes some executive orders altering or overturning some of Bush's regulations.

Is 2257 one of them? Who knows.

2257 was Clinton, not Bush

They said it on the news on TV.

It was just redone under Bush admin. Twice

Yep, It just came back around again about a month ago.

lol, not to sound like a dick here, but WHICH news, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, BBC, CBC, etc etc etc

and again he's only been "in charge" for less then 8 hours now, and today is ONLY ceremony shit, he don't start work till 2morrow AFTER the "morning Prayer"


-Loki-

I don't recall any 2257 inspections under Clinton.

Please tell us when they occurred?

ADG

I've heard it from several news sources, the memo did go out.

But I don't think it covers all laws, just things specifically put forward by the previous administration.

I haven't seen any details though but I think the laws are still in effect, but say the previous attorney general ordered that 100 new 2257 inspectors be hired, that would be halted. Just an example.

At least that's my understanding so far.

Yea it should be interresting to see what becomes of it. They did use the word "pending" in the news story (NBC News btw) so I dunno if it would cover the part of 2257 that went active today or not.

Here ya go...



http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...politi csNews

thanks for the link.. Yea by their explanation, it would seem that 2257 was set up as a one of these "midnight regulations" being it was set up to go into effect the day of the inauguration.

2257 was under Reagan after the Tracy Lords incident.

Link appreciated :)

-Loki-

Nice try, it was November 18, 1988 Title 18 United States Code Section 2257 was reenacted. that would be ronnie

But will he get rid of the Patriot Act? Doubt it...

2257 doesnt appear to be a "midnight regulation." 2257 has been around long before the time between the election and Obama taking office.

What do you do in adult?!? :1orglaugh :upsidedow j/k

ADG

I won't speak for the others, but me? I surf tube sites, troll boards and stalk pornstars on Myspace :)

Federal Register: December 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 244)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 77431-77472]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18de08-24]


[[Page 77431]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part V





Department of Justice





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



28 CFR Part 75



Revised Regulations for Records Relating to Visual Depictions of
Sexually Explicit Conduct; Inspection of Records Relating to Depiction
of Simulated Sexually Explicit Performance; Final Rule


[[Page 77432]]

SUMMARY: This rule finalizes two proposed rules and amends the record-
keeping, labeling, and inspection requirements to account for changes
in the underlying statute made by Congress in enacting the Adam Walsh
Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.

DATES: This rule is effective January 20, 2009. Compliance date: The
requirements of this rule apply to producers of visual depictions of
the lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a person and
producers of simulated sexually explicit conduct as of March 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child
Exploitation and Obscenity section, Criminal Division, United States
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514-5780. This is
not a toll-free number.

Keep going guys, soon we'll have had 2257 pre-date the Great Depression and be one of the causes for it! :1orglaugh

Supreme Court refused to hear Goverments appeal of 6th Courts ruling on the Communications Decency Act which was ruled as unconstitutional . Has NOTHING to do with Obama!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/...ernet_blocking