![]() |
Apache 2.0.43 worth installing?
And I donīt want opinions of people who havenīt used it...but
just heard that it sucks.......Thank You DynaMite:winkwink: |
... I heared it sucks !
|
Quote:
DynaMite |
... hahahaha !!
... to be honest with you I have not upgraded yet, because I am a lazzy bastard and there are only some minor bug fixes ... nevertheless I will do it this weekend, if you want me to I will let you know ... |
Quote:
from scratch based on a completely different structure. http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/new_features_2_0.html Itīs now multithreaded and also the API for the modules is completely new.....this is not just an upgrade...itīs a complete different webserver. DynaMite |
This probably isn't what you meant, but I have it on my personal machine. I use it for script development and testing purposes. I have about half a dozen virtual hosts setup on it. So far, it's been 100% stable and I like it. With the 1.x series I would experience a lot of minor irritations with setup and performance but 2.0.43 doesn't give me any hassles.
SpaceAce |
Apache 2.x is basically an entirely different beast, so only upgrade if you can get your custom modules also for 2.x - for example, if you use mod_perl at all, you really -dont- want to go to 2.x since a lot of custom modules will plain out refuse to work, or cause some major crashage because they're not thread safe.
|
I know the modules issues....all I basically need is mod_rewrite,
mod_auth_mysql and php. I donīt use dynamic loaded modules. I prefer to compile everything static in the httpd binary...all modules I need are working under 2.0 so I donīt have any issues with that......I guess Iīm going to give it a shot.....will let you guys know what happens DynaMite :2 cents: |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123