New PaySite, please evaluate
 

A friend of mine made a paysite, asked to evaluate, please tell what first page design is better from your point, and what do you think about a whole thing:

http://www.xnest.com/1/
http://www.xnest.com/2/
http://www.xnest.com/3/

I also appreciate if you point to any stylistic or grammatic mistakes in English inscriptions. I'm not good enough in English to find possible errors.

Page one says "Youngest Girls" then shows this pic...

http://www.xnest.com/1/img_morda/girlmonth.jpg


WTF?

She's a man baby a man I tell you...
For real, isnt that a she-male?

No. Actually she's one of my models. However I agree she looks a bit older then 18 (and she is a bit older I must confess). May be he put her on a first page just because she's one of the beautiest girls he has...

hmm..
i like this face http://www.xnest.com/3
maybe i advertise this site..

she looks like someone i met on the streets in santa cruz

that model was a really really bad choice to use on the splash page of a site billing itself as having the youngest models.


designs look pretty good. test them out and see which one works best.

please get me real! link on advert registration page ..

Well, it's not much of my biz, actually, but if you decide, take a look here:

http://www.xnest.com/cgi-bin/signup?0 - pay percent program
http://www.xnest.com/cgi-bin/signup?1 - pay per signup program
http://www.xnest.com/cgi-bin/signup?2 - pay per click program

Damn, I shouldn't have post the thread. It looks more and more like I'm spamming.