RabbitsReviews Top Ten Sites for January :-)
 

RabbitsReviews top ten new reviews for January are out. As always, if you're looking for some new sites that have some solid value for surfers, these be them...

Site / Program / Score
1. Scandinavian Feet, Natural Media Group, 86
2. Shemale Tugjobs, SpiderDollars, 84
2. American Kittens, Rich Cash, 84
2. Thai Cuties, Clockwork Cash , 84
3. Ladyboy Player, Spider Dollars, 83
4. Jane Burgess, Desert Bucks, 82
5. Tranny Police, Tranny Dollars, 81
5. Black Shemale Stars, Spider Dollars, 81
5. 8teen Kitties, Adult Real Cash, 81
6. Dicky Bitches, Ferro Cash, 80
6. Captive Male, Bondage Bank, 80
6. Bareback 101 , Brain Cash , 80

If we're not sending traffic your way, you can always submit here.

*Sites may not be new themselves, but new to RabbitsReviews.
*Sites are rated based on our criteria.

You making good money with a review site, m8?

fetish seems to sell.

RabbitsReviews.com is king of review sites!

Great list as usual! :)

"Good money" is a little subjective... but we pay the bills.

Rabbit's Reviews?? Nah, no one's ever heard of them. How could they be making money??

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

thx for sharing

If he wasn't he wouldn't be doing it ;)

so many tranny stuff? impressive

:thumbsup:thumbsup

Never heard of your site :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I don't remember asking you, asswipe.

Yep... it was a full month! :)

problem of all review sites is the same. everytime there is new program, review sites put all sites from program to the system in one day, so you can see almost shitty old sites on homepage ... and if i see the top ten its the same with rabbits also ... but you guys are still most on time so wish you best with your site! :thumbsup

rabbits reviews is great :thumbsup

I bet if you and Jet had babies, you could devolve humanity into chimps in about two generations. Maximum.

I hear ya. There are certain aspects of the review site business that you can't escape from. But if this is really the worst thing about our business, it explains why I've been sleeping so soundly at night. :)

Hey Doug. We have received an email from Melissa. Tell her we are almost ready for our review. Just adding more content to the members area and then we'll get in touch.

cheers. great list btw.

Hi Doug. Thanks for reviewing my site and the good review. :)

Thanks again for the review. :thumbsup

Great site Jane. V.hot.
Stay natural!!

I think Bush was their first.

Lol.. thanks for the list.

Thank you. I plan to stay natural. :)

Congrats Richcash.

Thanks very much! I've passed it along ;)

nice list :)

Cheers Jane and Shunga! Great sites ;)

Let me know if you need anything!

good list,thanks Doug. :)

you sure this isn't Rabbit his personal top 10?

;))))

congrats guys :)

The criteria would result in ....

The Shopping Channel 90%


The Godfather 50%

It does not to point to the hotest most erotic websites, I presume it points the traffic to the programmes that give the most cash.

wow you have just won the most stupid egoistic reply i got on gfy, so gfy :error

interesting, there is few tranny sites in that list, I expected to see some boobs or milf sites

Great ones!

Wrong. They send traffic to all the sites that they review. They just post on the forums the top 10 sites of that month. It is pretty shitty of you to assume that they would only send traffic to sites that they make the most money off of. Just because you do not find a site erotic, does not mean other people do not find it erotic. Aren't you the same person that was bitching about reviews sites a couple of months ago?

Yes still bitching, 99% of traffic from review site goes to the few sites they give top scores to and place on the first pages. They expect ALL sites that they review to send traffic to them.

The criteria they choose gives points to the amount of content over quality and originality. As I point out the shopping channel would win over "The Godfather".

I don't know if they have any expertise on reviewing sites but they are businesmen, I don't know why that is shitty to say.

In newspapers the independant song or film gets the same chance of a good review and space as the hollywood blockbuster. It is a shame here that review sites don't give the same chance to the more creative independant sites.

But hey don't let my bitching upset you, please feel free to keep kissing arse .

Well, Jane pays 50% on an $18 membership. I'm pretty sure out of the 120+ sites we looked at in January, we could have found a few that pay more.

You do make me smile :-)

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that there must be some reason for giving such dull websites high scores, but if its not even the money that really is bad news.

www.dictionary.com :2 cents:

My website is not dull pal. I have way better content then your sorry ass looking website has. I run my website by myself and work my ass off on it. Stop being such a bitter bitch. All those other websites that are ranked in January's top ten work their asses off too. Perhaps you should try that instead of crying on here all the time. Jackass. :321GFY:321GFY

So much hostility on this thread.

Do all of the Tranny sites indicate that there are a lot of men exploring their inner desires online, unbeknownst to their wives, girlfriends and friends?

Congrats Jane at comming in at number 4 :) and great work as always Doug :thumbsup

We should talk, I got two sites worth reviewing.

great site :)

Looks good Doug. Keep up the good work. Always love seeing whats selling well. :D

Cheers, my friend! To be clear, the list in not an indication of sales. The sites listed just do a good job on putting it all together and that's a great place to start from where we stand.

:thumbsup:thumbsup

Then make the scoring criteria "how much ass has the webmaster left" !

Instead we have this scoring of content / navigation / other score / which is just complety nonsensical allowing the review site to give whatever score they want.

If a site is hot and good value for money what more is there to be said ?

If they charge a one off fee? Why are they penilised for less updates?

I assumed that this was just to get the traffic to the better paying programs. If not it is plain stupid.

Review sites could be a great source of strength in the industry supporting the creative and original, giving the punter confidence to part with his money, pointing him to new delights.

Sadly most review sites seem content to send their traffic to the same old 20 sites...and seem to rig the criteria to do it.