GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Let's eliminate illegal tubes ONCE AND FOR ALL (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=886972)

BradM 02-10-2009 11:21 AM

Let's eliminate illegal tubes ONCE AND FOR ALL
 
So all these topics lately made me think - what can we do to eliminate tubes?
As a program owner and as someone who is making money from these tube sites - I can tell you what will bring them down. People ceasing advertising on them. For example I spend over 10k a month on tube site advertising because the ROI is incredible. So the way to take tubes down is to take away their advertisers!!!

So here's what I think we should do. Approach all companies who advertise on tubes and work out a deal. Send them the same sales they make on the tubes in return for taking the ads down. So basically, for me for example - get a pool of real webmasters together who can send me 3 sales a day each so it makes financial sense to stop advertising on these sites. Then companies like twistys, aff, and all the other sites spending big money on ads every month will have no problem stopping the support of your stolen content.


Oh wait, that's right. No one here can send sales which is why we as program owners are going where the money and sales are going.

I've tried for years to buy banners from little TGPs that GFY webmasters own. They either want $2k a month for a banner that gets 97 clicks a day or don't reply to emails. Then I see them begging for trades to get an extra sale a week on their network. It's hilarious! I do everything I can to get productive webmasters from adult message boards. Guess what - that doesn't exist anymore. People here are struggling to make 1k a month selling FREE TRIAL $35pps memberships. WOW.

I've had this conversation with a few program owners, and namely a couple dating program affiliate reps. There's no such thing as "little webmasters" any more. We can't even PAY you idiots to put our ads up. So really, you're giving away your content and losing potential traffic at the same time.

You're all a bunch of under working underachieving whiners. Go out and get the traffic these sites get and maybe you will get a piece of the pie. Or sit here and say I am "hurting myself" and "destroying the industry". I frankly don't care because I am making money and you are trying to find a way to not lose your entire lifestyle. And it's your fault for not taking action and working harder to find a solution to your issues.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 11:26 AM

Nice post Brad!

WeirdHomer 02-10-2009 11:30 AM

Although i'm totally against illegal tube sites your post got me thinking and conclusion is, what you say is absolutelly right and sounds logical to me. Good read man :thumbsup
Now something else..... Why not buy ad spots at tube sites with clips that have a playtime of let's say maximum 2 mins.... is there something in that region that would change things around a bit?

BradM 02-10-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeirdHomer (Post 15467940)
Although i'm totally against illegal tube sites your post got me thinking and conclusion is, what you say is absolutelly right and sounds logical to me. Good read man :thumbsup
Now something else..... Why not buy ad spots at tube sites with clips that have a playtime of let's say maximum 2 mins.... is there something in that region that would change things around a bit?

Fantastic thought. I'd love to. But I have not found a reasonable site that has 2 min clips (teasers or hardcore) that offers good advertising rates (if they do at all)

I'd love to go that route... very good idea.

Dirty F 02-10-2009 11:34 AM

I'm playing with my balls right now.

PR_Sebas 02-10-2009 11:48 AM

Good read indeed.

Martin 02-10-2009 11:56 AM

So FastSize does good with tube traffic?

DarkJedi 02-10-2009 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM (Post 15467892)
I frankly don't care because I am making money

by supporting criminals.

hats off to you, mister

http://www.darksidedata.com/rolleyes.gif

brand0n 02-10-2009 11:57 AM

what kind of roi you seeing on that 10k

KickAssJesse 02-10-2009 12:00 PM

Nicely said!!

BradM 02-10-2009 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15468100)
by supporting criminals.

hats off to you, mister

http://www.darksidedata.com/rolleyes.gif

Thanks. I'll do it all day and have absolutely no problems doing it either. OH NO THE INTERNET POLICE SAYS IT IS ILLEGAL OMGZ

BradM 02-10-2009 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brand0n (Post 15468103)
what kind of roi you seeing on that 10k

Send me some traffic and you'll find out. Take a fucking link, put it in an email and click send for fuck sakes. how hard is it

HorseShit 02-10-2009 12:02 PM

Wow, big tubes have a lot of traffic?

GREAT NEW INSIGHT!

Tom_PM 02-10-2009 12:05 PM

People sure seem to toss the word "illegal" around a lot, has there been some tube site court cases that aren't being made public or something? It's kind of confusing to be honest.

HorseShit 02-10-2009 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 15468168)
People sure seem to toss the word "illegal" around a lot, has there been some tube site court cases that aren't being made public or something? It's kind of confusing to be honest.

That term is completely retarded.

The people that say they are "illegal" do nothing about it anyway.

DarkJedi 02-10-2009 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM (Post 15468131)
Thanks. I'll do it all day and have absolutely no problems doing it either. OH NO THE INTERNET POLICE SAYS IT IS ILLEGAL OMGZ

You're making money just because you aren't selling porn. Which 90% of webmasters on this board do. By supporting the tube sites you are costing these webmasters a ton of money. You are basically fucking them in the ass.

The least you could do is be discreet about it, not flaunt it around.

pornguy 02-10-2009 12:08 PM

I can for sure understand what you mean.

DarkJedi 02-10-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 15468168)
People sure seem to toss the word "illegal" around a lot, has there been some tube site court cases that aren't being made public or something? It's kind of confusing to be honest.

Not much is being done about mp3 ripping either. Yet the music industry is hurting like fuck from it.

Just because there are loopholes in the law, doesn't mean it isn't illegal.

BFT3K 02-10-2009 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15468100)
by supporting criminals. Hats off to you.

Exactly! This industry is on the road to nowhere...

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 15468168)
People sure seem to toss the word "illegal" around a lot, has there been some tube site court cases that aren't being made public or something? It's kind of confusing to be honest.

Actually now that you say it, I agree, we need to figure out a new thing to call them, just because we think they are "illegal" doesn't mean they are.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15468176)
You're making money just because you aren't selling porn. Which 90% of webmasters on this board do. By supporting the tube sites you are costing these webmasters a ton of money. You are basically fucking them in the ass.

The least you could do is be discreet about it, not flaunt it around.

Tell that to Shap who IS SELLING PORN.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15468200)
Not much is being done about mp3 ripping either. Yet the music industry is hurting like fuck from it.

Just because there are loopholes in the law, doesn't mean it isn't illegal.

Same rules apply, adapt or die. How many people started hating Metallica for being so fucking cheap and stingy about their music and stopped supporting them, and how many artists have made a KILLING by giving away their music free on the internet? Don't believe artists are actually doing it? Nine Inch Nails, Trent Reznor has said due to giving away his music via his own site, he's seen a much bigger turn around.

Just because you cannot understand it, doesn't mean it doesn't work.

tony286 02-10-2009 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retox Josh (Post 15468305)
Tell that to Shap who IS SELLING PORN.



Same rules apply, adapt or die. How many people started hating Metallica for being so fucking cheap and stingy about their music and stopped supporting them, and how many artists have made a KILLING by giving away their music free on the internet? Don't believe artists are actually doing it? Nine Inch Nails, Trent Reznor has said due to giving away his music via his own site, he's seen a much bigger turn around.

Just because you cannot understand it, doesn't mean it doesn't work.

Musicians are different they can go on tour. cant do that with porn.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 12:25 PM

I am not going to read anything above but the following comes to mind...

"Change in Industry", "Its a business Decision", "Evolve or Die" as the standard mantra's of excuse to giving into Crooks and paying crooks.

Here comes the spin cycle for the justification of doing business with thieves.

Stop waisting time the flood gates are now open go buy yourself some nice spots on the tube sites. Everyone may as well just dive right in the battle is over game set and match...

tony286 02-10-2009 12:26 PM

Now if they were giving away a fast size clone for free,that diluted the value of his product I have no doubt Brad would be screaming from the highest mountain top.
Everyone keeps feeding these guys they will have most of the traffic. Whats to stop them from producing their own content pushing FarL and Shap and anyone else out or getting a fast size clone made in china for pennies and selling themselves and keeping all the money? Just something to think about once they have most of the traffic the other part isnt hard to recreate.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15468318)
Musicians are different they can go on tour. cant do that with porn.

I bet you if someone actually opened up shoots to regular people to for $$ and they will show up and pay to see it in person, hell make a special studio that allows them to have their own personal room to be in, and watch the shoot behind a window so they could actually whip out their dicks and smack it around, and i'm sure they will make a killing. Tube sites can't take that.

Porn stars can tour also, If Jenna Jameson was still doing porn, with her status in the industry and the world in general, she could just show up at a strip club, do alittle dancing with some of the strippers, and make a killing there too.

Theres more to the adult industry than fucking on camera, then selling memberships to a site for surfers to see it.

BFT3K 02-10-2009 12:29 PM

Yeah, that makes sense to me. In fact stores like Sears are trying to figure out new ways to get more customers into their stores nowadays as well. Clearly they are not thinking very hard about this, because if they really wanted lots of traffic they would just give everything away for free! Traffic problem solved! What a bunch of morons!

DarkJedi 02-10-2009 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retox Josh (Post 15468305)
Tell that to Shap who IS SELLING PORN.

And what makes Shap different? He is a fucking douchebag in my book.

I think he made a deal with the tubes. Like, he buys advertising and in exchange they don't use his content on the tubes.

Basically, he's leeching off of other porn programs, who are getting their full vids ripped off.

tony286 02-10-2009 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retox Josh (Post 15468377)
I bet you if someone actually opened up shoots to regular people to for $$ and they will show up and pay to see it in person, hell make a special studio that allows them to have their own personal room to be in, and watch the shoot behind a window so they could actually whip out their dicks and smack it around, and i'm sure they will make a killing. Tube sites can't take that.

Porn stars can tour also, If Jenna Jameson was still doing porn, with her status in the industry and the world in general, she could just show up at a strip club, do alittle dancing with some of the strippers, and make a killing there too.

Theres more to the adult industry than fucking on camera, then selling memberships to a site for surfers to see it.

Its against the law to have people pay to come to live sex shows in the us.FYI

Brujah 02-10-2009 12:33 PM

Steal content! Ok, Got it. Thanks.

Reak AGV 02-10-2009 12:34 PM

I totally agree with Brad here :)

Nicky 02-10-2009 12:35 PM

Conclusion, after all these years traffic is still king.

BradM 02-10-2009 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15468349)
Now if they were giving away a fast size clone for free,that diluted the value of his product I have no doubt Brad would be screaming from the highest mountain top.
Everyone keeps feeding these guys they will have most of the traffic. Whats to stop them from producing their own content pushing FarL and Shap and anyone else out or getting a fast size clone made in china for pennies and selling themselves and keeping all the money? Just something to think about once they have most of the traffic the other part isnt hard to recreate.

That already happens, and we have adapted and are now selling more than ever. next attempt please chubby.

woj 02-10-2009 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15468349)
Now if they were giving away a fast size clone for free,that diluted the value of his product I have no doubt Brad would be screaming from the highest mountain top.
Everyone keeps feeding these guys they will have most of the traffic. Whats to stop them from producing their own content pushing FarL and Shap and anyone else out or getting a fast size clone made in china for pennies and selling themselves and keeping all the money? Just something to think about once they have most of the traffic the other part isnt hard to recreate.

That would involve too much work, easier to just keep raising the rates, leaving smaller and smaller profits for content producers... :2 cents:

tony286 02-10-2009 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM (Post 15468479)
That already happens, and we have adapted and are now selling more than ever. next attempt please chubby.

Did I call you names?

BradM 02-10-2009 12:42 PM

As I made this thread, I made 4 sales from tube sites - and you made nothing. My point has been proven. No one in this thread has sent me ANY sales - but tubes have. Yet you are all in here giving your 2c and bitching and whining. I win.

BradM 02-10-2009 12:44 PM

Hey, here's some good news for everyone in this thread: http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/10/news...ion=2009021013

seeandsee 02-10-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky (Post 15468439)
Conclusion, after all these years traffic is still king.

looks like

Brujah 02-10-2009 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM (Post 15468520)
As I made this thread, I made 4 sales from tube sites - and you made nothing. My point has been proven. No one in this thread has sent me ANY sales - but tubes have. Yet you are all in here giving your 2c and bitching and whining. I win.

Cool. Post stats from 1 illegal tube site? Are they your best affiliate?

Matt 26z 02-10-2009 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM (Post 15467892)
There's no such thing as "little webmasters" any more.

That is because the affiliate industry eggs were all in the TGP basket for so many years. And well, we all know what happened with that.

There hasn't been any TGP innovation in literally an entire decade because the TGP industry paralyzed itself with submit rules so strict that evolution was not allowed to take place.

If a submitter wanted to try something new, he damn well sure wasn't going to get accepted anywhere (cheater! cheater! you are blacklisted!) And if a TGP owner wanted to go down a different path, submitters were not going to fashion galleries just for that one TGP.

So everyone stuck to the same shitty process for 10+ years. Galleries that contained 12-15 photos, from the same set, pushing one sponsor, strict limits on the type and number of ads, no javascript or Flash and a link trade at the top.

It was 2005, 2006, 2007 and the TGP's were forcing each other to work like it was still 1999. Now TGP's are pretty much irrelevant and clinging to the traffic that hasn't been exposed to tubes yet.

After what should have been a decade of evolution, TGP's should still be at the top. Webmasters at all levels should still be able to make decent money though them. But no, the "TGP mafia" didn't want to change anything since it might jeopardize their positions at the top of SexTracker.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 15468420)
Steal content! Ok, Got it. Thanks.

You really think they are stealing content? You think a company like NastyDollars wouldn't go and sue the living pants of pornhub for stealing their content? No, why? because they realized that they could make money off these sites.

How many people here talk about putting sexy videos up on youtube with watermarks on them? Quite a few I've seen, how that works is they watch the video, kind of get turned on, type in the url of the watermark wanting to see more, get to a site, and signup.. That's how programs are doing it, they are giving a few full scenes away with their watermark on them to these tubes, and in exchange they get type in traffic that actually converts better then the thousands of shitty traffic affiliates send them and ends up costing them.

Think about it, they give a 20 minute video to porn hub with their watermark, that video gets hundreds of thousands of views, out of those hundreds of thousands, thousands of them type realitykings.com into their browser and go, see more, buy a membership, FULL MEMBERSHIP IS THEIRS TO KEEP.

Whereas you send them hundreds of thousands of traffic, that costs them bandwidth, and in exchange they get 10 or so sales, and end up paying you 50% of it, or $35 on a $4.99 sale that doesn't end up converting to another month. So not only are they paying extra bandwidth fees for your shitty traffic, they are giving half if not, more then they make off the sale to you.

Food for thought.

BradM 02-10-2009 12:53 PM

Josh and Matt, thank you.

Brujah 02-10-2009 12:56 PM

I don't know Josh. All this talk about Adapt or Die, and how great illegal tubes are and why we should all be supporting them for getting traffic by stealing content. What message do you expect people to get from all of this?

Steal Content! Don't get caught. Hide who you are, making it difficult for them to pursue. Get big enough and then blackmail or extort them into making deals with you.

PowerCum 02-10-2009 12:56 PM

Good reading.
I think a bit different than you, but it's because I'm headed in completely different direction.

In any case, what you say is a big truth. I have always conducted my business based on profit margins and not on what other webmasters say, like, or want me to do.

BFT3K 02-10-2009 12:57 PM

Tube sites are where guys go to jerk off for free. The more free content the better!

tony286 02-10-2009 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retox Josh (Post 15468630)
You really think they are stealing content? You think a company like NastyDollars wouldn't go and sue the living pants of pornhub for stealing their content? No, why? because they realized that they could make money off these sites.

How many people here talk about putting sexy videos up on youtube with watermarks on them? Quite a few I've seen, how that works is they watch the video, kind of get turned on, type in the url of the watermark wanting to see more, get to a site, and signup.. That's how programs are doing it, they are giving a few full scenes away with their watermark on them to these tubes, and in exchange they get type in traffic that actually converts better then the thousands of shitty traffic affiliates send them and ends up costing them.

Think about it, they give a 20 minute video to porn hub with their watermark, that video gets hundreds of thousands of views, out of those hundreds of thousands, thousands of them type realitykings.com into their browser and go, see more, buy a membership, FULL MEMBERSHIP IS THEIRS TO KEEP.

Whereas you send them hundreds of thousands of traffic, that costs them bandwidth, and in exchange they get 10 or so sales, and end up paying you 50% of it, or $35 on a $4.99 sale that doesn't end up converting to another month. So not only are they paying extra bandwidth fees for your shitty traffic, they are giving half if not, more then they make off the sale to you.

Food for thought.

noone gets sued for the most part because they are in places where its hard to sue them. Wonder why there are no us illegal tubes?

peeperpimp 02-10-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retox Josh (Post 15468630)
You really think they are stealing content? You think a company like NastyDollars wouldn't go and sue the living pants of pornhub for stealing their content? No, why? because they realized that they could make money off these sites.

How many people here talk about putting sexy videos up on youtube with watermarks on them? Quite a few I've seen, how that works is they watch the video, kind of get turned on, type in the url of the watermark wanting to see more, get to a site, and signup.. That's how programs are doing it, they are giving a few full scenes away with their watermark on them to these tubes, and in exchange they get type in traffic that actually converts better then the thousands of shitty traffic affiliates send them and ends up costing them.

Think about it, they give a 20 minute video to porn hub with their watermark, that video gets hundreds of thousands of views, out of those hundreds of thousands, thousands of them type realitykings.com into their browser and go, see more, buy a membership, FULL MEMBERSHIP IS THEIRS TO KEEP.

Whereas you send them hundreds of thousands of traffic, that costs them bandwidth, and in exchange they get 10 or so sales, and end up paying you 50% of it, or $35 on a $4.99 sale that doesn't end up converting to another month. So not only are they paying extra bandwidth fees for your shitty traffic, they are giving half if not, more then they make off the sale to you.

Food for thought.

I dont usually get involved in these tube threads and I'll keep my tube opinions to myself but, that definetly is something to think about.

WeirdHomer 02-10-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retox Josh (Post 15468630)

Whereas you send them hundreds of thousands of traffic, that costs them bandwidth, and in exchange they get 10 or so sales, and end up paying you 50% of it, or $35 on a $4.99 sale that doesn't end up converting to another month. So not only are they paying extra bandwidth fees for your shitty traffic, they are giving half if not, more then they make off the sale to you.

So no sponsor made any money from any affiliate before the tube sites started to pop out of the ground? People seem to think there is nothing else but tubes around anymore... Not true!
I don't have one tube nor do i use tubes. I STILL make good money using galleries, TGPs, MGPs, Blogs, SEO, etc....
Only difference is now i have to invest... Thumbzilla, JJs movies, Pichunter, Richards Realm, etc... don't take submitions without an account anymore but i think this would also have been the case if tube sites wouldn't exist :2 cents:

I understand BradMs thinking though..... it's a basic business rule, adapt to the market or you die, simple. I to adapted but in a diffrent way.

BV 02-10-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retox Josh (Post 15468630)
You really think they are stealing content? You think a company like NastyDollars wouldn't go and sue the living pants of pornhub for stealing their content? No, why? because they realized that they could make money off these sites.

How many people here talk about putting sexy videos up on youtube with watermarks on them? Quite a few I've seen, how that works is they watch the video, kind of get turned on, type in the url of the watermark wanting to see more, get to a site, and signup.. That's how programs are doing it, they are giving a few full scenes away with their watermark on them to these tubes, and in exchange they get type in traffic that actually converts better then the thousands of shitty traffic affiliates send them and ends up costing them.

Think about it, they give a 20 minute video to porn hub with their watermark, that video gets hundreds of thousands of views, out of those hundreds of thousands, thousands of them type realitykings.com into their browser and go, see more, buy a membership, FULL MEMBERSHIP IS THEIRS TO KEEP.

Whereas you send them hundreds of thousands of traffic, that costs them bandwidth, and in exchange they get 10 or so sales, and end up paying you 50% of it, or $35 on a $4.99 sale that doesn't end up converting to another month. So not only are they paying extra bandwidth fees for your shitty traffic, they are giving half if not, more then they make off the sale to you.

Food for thought.


That's way different than paying them off!

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 15468673)
I don't know Josh. All this talk about Adapt or Die, and how great illegal tubes are and why we should all be supporting them for getting traffic by stealing content. What message do you expect people to get from all of this?

Steal Content! Don't get caught. Hide who you are, making it difficult for them to pursue. Get big enough and then blackmail or extort them into making deals with you.

If the programs are giving the content to the tubes, it's not illegal, and they are not stealing the content...

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15468694)
noone gets sued for the most part because they are in places where its hard to sue them. Wonder why there are no us illegal tubes?

If pornhub is owned by brazzers like everyone thinks, brazzers is out of WA, you have an "illegal" tube in the US.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-10-2009 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeirdHomer (Post 15468729)
So no sponsor made any money from any affiliate before the tube sites started to pop out of the ground? People seem to think there is nothing else but tubes around anymore... Not true!
I don't have one tube nor do i use tubes. I STILL make good money using galleries, TGPs, MGPs, Blogs, SEO, etc....
Only difference is now i have to invest... Thumbzilla, JJs movies, Pichunter, Richards Realm, etc... don't take submitions without an account anymore but i think this would also have been the case if tube sites wouldn't exist :2 cents:

I'm not saying they never made any money off affiliates before, what I'm saying is, they are making more with tubes than with an affiliate, re read what I posted.

Affiliate sends thousands of visitors, makes a 10 sales, takes half the profit.

Sponsor gives full out dated scene to tube site with their watermark, same amount of people that affiliate sent them types the url in, goes and 30 people actually sign up, sponsor keeps all profits, x3.

What would you rather do?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc