GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bush caused a recession!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=892234)

Splum 03-07-2009 06:04 PM

Bush caused a recession!!
 
I will admit it Bush caused a recession... Obama is causing a depression. Enjoy.

http://i42.tinypic.com/nqbedk.jpg

John. 03-07-2009 06:09 PM

is it worth getting a sig spot here?

Diomed 03-07-2009 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John. (Post 15597347)
is it worth getting a sig spot here?

No,

move along.. nothing to see here.

Splum 03-07-2009 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John. (Post 15597347)
is it worth getting a sig spot here?

You guys are catching on.

Paul Waters 03-07-2009 06:14 PM

You Butt Hurt Republicans are so cute.

The Bush economy was a giant Ponzi scheme. All the growth of the last eights years was a fraud, fueled by fictitious paper created by suits.

And you blame Obama.

This economy is due to right wing nut economics.

Brujah 03-07-2009 06:21 PM

http://www.exxxpired.com/banners/exxxpired_120x600.gif

StickyGreen 03-07-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15597336)
I will admit it Bush caused a recession... Obama is causing a depression. Enjoy.

http://i42.tinypic.com/nqbedk.jpg

If you think presidents cause recessions and depressions then you don't have a clue about how our financial system works.

StickyGreen 03-07-2009 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Waters (Post 15597365)

The Bush economy was a giant Ponzi scheme.

Actually, the way the Federal Reserve operates is a Ponzi scheme. It's called fractional reserve banking, and last time I checked, the Federal Reserve is still there. Has nothing to do with Bush or Obama.

MindWaste 03-07-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 15597387)
Actually, the way the Federal Reserve operates is a Ponzi scheme. It's called fractional reserve banking, and last time I checked, the Federal Reserve is still there. Has nothing to do with Bush or Obama.

The federal reserve owns america. It is a bank that the goverment has been borrowing from sence the old days.

StickyGreen 03-07-2009 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MindWaste (Post 15597396)
The federal reserve owns america. It is a bank that the goverment has been borrowing from sence the old days.

Yes, but most people still don't understand this concept at all. They can't seem to figure out why great men like Andrew Jackson basically devoted their lives to getting rid of the central bank.

This documentary explains the history of central banking, if anyone actually wants to learn something:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...=money+masters

MindWaste 03-07-2009 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 15597404)
Yes, but most people still don't understand this concept at all. They can't seem to figure out why great men like Andrew Jackson basically devoted their lives to getting rid of the central bank.

This documentary explains the history of central banking, if anyone actually wants to learn something:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...=money+masters

I whould have watched it but It was like 5 hours long.

Paul Waters 03-07-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 15597387)
Actually, the way the Federal Reserve operates is a Ponzi scheme. It's called fractional reserve banking, and last time I checked, the Federal Reserve is still there. Has nothing to do with Bush or Obama.

Canada has a fractional reserve banking system, as do all G7 countries. Modern banking depends on it. Banking from WW II onward has depended on it. Without, we would have never seen the economic growth that we did.

The problem was that Greenspan did not oversee the banks properly, and the MBA's came up with Ponzi schemes like ABCP.

Further Greenspan kept interest rates too low, allowed money supply to grow too quickly, and taxes were too low.

In a booming economy, the Bush government had no business running deficits. Bush inherited a pretty good fiscal situation from Clinton, then fucked it up as fast as he could.

StickyGreen 03-07-2009 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MindWaste (Post 15597419)
I whould have watched it but It was like 5 hours long.

Yea it sucks that people are intimidated by long articles and long videos. It's a shame because that film beautifully explains the history of central banking, something Americans should know about.

IllTestYourGirls 03-07-2009 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 15597432)
Yea it sucks that people are intimidated by long articles and long videos. It's a shame because that film beautifully explains the history of central banking, something Americans should know about.

Most dont get taught about it in school. They dont want the mass to understand their slavery.

StickyGreen 03-07-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Waters (Post 15597431)

Modern banking depends on it.

Modern banking depends on fractional reserve banking? Wow, who sold you that one?

I got a nice bridge for sale you might like...

Paul Waters 03-07-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 15597438)
Modern banking depends on fractional reserve banking? Wow, who sold you that one?

I got a nice bridge for sale you might like...

Put a little more effort into your answer, laddie.

At least cite a country that has operated without one in the last 70 years.

You are a fan of Ron Paul, right?

IllTestYourGirls 03-07-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Waters (Post 15597431)
Canada has a fractional reserve banking system, as do all G7 countries. Modern banking depends on it. Banking from WW II onward has depended on it. Without, we would have never seen the economic growth that we did.

The problem was that Greenspan did not oversee the banks properly, and the MBA's came up with Ponzi schemes like ABCP.

Further Greenspan kept interest rates too low, allowed money supply to grow too quickly, and taxes were too low.

In a booming economy, the Bush government had no business running deficits. Bush inherited a pretty good fiscal situation from Clinton, then fucked it up as fast as he could.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

CyberHustler 03-07-2009 06:47 PM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

StickyGreen 03-07-2009 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Waters (Post 15597445)
Put a little more effort into your answer, laddie.

At least cite a country that has operated without one in the last 70 years.

You are a fan of Ron Paul, right?

Oh I get it, you're one of those "it is how it is so that's just how it's supposed to be" type of guys.

Paul Waters 03-07-2009 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 15597606)
Oh I get it, you're one of those "it is how it is so that's just how it's supposed to be" type of guys.

I am more one of those, "just because you pull it out of your ass, does not make it a good idea" type.

Azoy? 03-07-2009 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15597336)
I will admit it Bush caused a recession... Obama is causing a depression. Enjoy.

http://i42.tinypic.com/nqbedk.jpg

OK did everyone miss the obvious ?
What is Obama taking off the side of his mouth with his finger ? :1orglaugh

Splum 03-07-2009 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azoy? (Post 15597795)
OK did everyone miss the obvious ?
What is Obama taking off the side of his mouth with his finger ?

Bush semen?

uno 03-07-2009 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MindWaste (Post 15597396)
The federal reserve owns america. It is a bank that the goverment has been borrowing from sence the old days.

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen (Post 15597404)
Yes, but most people still don't understand this concept at all. They can't seem to figure out why great men like Andrew Jackson basically devoted their lives to getting rid of the central bank.

This documentary explains the history of central banking, if anyone actually wants to learn something:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...=money+masters

I think you two will make great friends.

WWC 03-07-2009 11:59 PM

Do you think anyone who would take the presidency seat could have made it turn around so fast after how much damage Bush built in 8 years? Come on man....

burntfilm 03-08-2009 12:41 AM

Wow, Obama did that quick!

StuartD 03-08-2009 03:56 AM

It's funny, you all blast people who supported Obama saying that they give him way too much credit, he can't 'save everyone' like they hope.

Then 6 weeks into his presidency you all flip the coin and give him way too much credit for dooming the nation and sending it into a depression in 6 weeks.

Well, which is it?? Is he that amazing or not?!!?

$5 submissions 03-08-2009 03:59 AM

A bit off topic but don't you guys think SOCIAL SECURITY is a "generational PONZI SCHEME"?

Reak AGV 03-08-2009 04:33 AM

That's such bullshit if you ask me, Obama is doing a good job.

seeandsee 03-08-2009 04:39 AM

obama for nation change :)

John-ACWM 03-08-2009 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15597357)
You guys are catching on.

:upsidedow :thumbsup

Shaze 03-08-2009 05:56 AM

yes, yes, Obama caused the depression in six weeks (load of bullshit).

this whole mess actually started with mortgage-backed securities and credit default swaps. the creation of these investment vehicles spurred the housing market and made a sort of multi-level marketing scheme which passed the risk associated with lending away from the mortgage originators (banks). i think Clinton signed the approval of credit default swaps and Bush mortgage backed securities (it could be the other way around, i might be mistaken). anyway, when the banks didn't have as much risk when approving mortgages and more liquidity to leverage because of mortgage-backed securities this started the housing market bubble. this is why they were giving mortgages to people who definitely couldn't afford it because the risk to them was pushed away by the creation of mortgage backed securities.

actually, i believe when the bubble burst for technology back in early 2000s it should have been much worse if not for the housing bubble sort of saving the economy. the housing bubble came at a time when the technology bubble had just burst and the economy started going down. the housing bubble sort of uplifted the economic bubble which was caused by technology and stopped it from really correcting itself when the technology bubble burst. if the creation of CDS and mortgage backed securities never took place i think the technology bubble deflating would have been worse and think it actually would have been good.

so this depression "or correction" if you want to call it that was long overdue, but saying that Obama is causing a depression when he has only been in office for 6 weeks is completely insane when he had nothing to do with creating any of these laws or investment type vehicles.

now his policy on trying to save the economy is another thing to argue about, but i don't think anyone has any clue on whether it will work or not since this is the first time in history something like this has happened. it will be an interesting few years.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15597336)
I will admit it Bush caused a recession... Obama is causing a depression. Enjoy.

http://i42.tinypic.com/nqbedk.jpg


GirlBri 03-08-2009 02:39 PM

fuck splum!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123