GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The Dow is up 379 points today, will Splum start a thread congratulating Obama (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=892774)

Snake Doctor 03-10-2009 01:08 PM

The Dow is up 379 points today, will Splum start a thread congratulating Obama
 
on what a great job he's doing and say that hope is alive?

It only took a 300 point drop for him to decide Obama was a terrible President.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=891113

Surely a 379 point gain makes him a good one now. :upsidedow

Reak AGV 03-10-2009 01:21 PM

I doubt he will, he's been so negative.

$5 submissions 03-10-2009 01:31 PM

I congratulate Obama administration on the uptick rule implemenation... and the short sellers covering their shorts thereby pumping up finance stock prices. However, the jury's still out on whether the uptick rule is really an effective brake against short stock speculation.

StuartD 03-10-2009 01:32 PM

http://www.nullifidian.net/wp-conten.../hypocrisy.jpg

Bill8 03-10-2009 01:45 PM

People like splum are desperately trying to cover up the crimes and mismanagement of the republicans.

So it's a waste of time to make ethical or rational arguments.

Their hatred for america is all they have left.

Snake Doctor 03-10-2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions (Post 15609530)
I congratulate Obama administration on the uptick rule implemenation... and the short sellers covering their shorts thereby pumping up finance stock prices. However, the jury's still out on whether the uptick rule is really an effective brake against short stock speculation.

Well the one thing the uptick rule can do is prevent alot of short bets from becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Without it a bear raid can drive a perfectly healthy company into bankruptcy.

smax 03-10-2009 01:58 PM

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Vr8Xl0cbUZ...cat_bounce.jpg

Snake Doctor 03-11-2009 11:37 AM

What's the matter Splumster? Does the Dow only matter when it backs up what you were already going to say about Obama?

You miserable punkfaggot

stickyfingerz 03-11-2009 12:08 PM

Did you start any congratulating Bush when the Dow hit 13,000 a year ago? lol

crockett 03-11-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor (Post 15609431)
on what a great job he's doing and say that hope is alive?

It only took a 300 point drop for him to decide Obama was a terrible President.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=891113

Surely a 379 point gain makes him a good one now. :upsidedow

lol no he will start at least 10 bashing him though. That guy sure as hell has gone off the deep end.

stickyfingerz 03-11-2009 12:12 PM

http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?Symbol=$indu&CP=0&PT=11

Dow record high during Bush's term. Interesting. lol

$5 submissions 03-11-2009 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor (Post 15609695)
Well the one thing the uptick rule can do is prevent alot of short bets from becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Without it a bear raid can drive a perfectly healthy company into bankruptcy.

Right but the uptick rule's been in effect since the 30's to 2007 and in all that time it hasn't really braked shorts in any fundamental way. The crash of 1987 still happened, people will still short stocks that they see have some real weakness. Bear raids of "perfectly healthy companies" are relatively rare considering the risk of shorting against the stock's fundamental strength.

Snake Doctor 03-11-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 15613596)
Did you start any congratulating Bush when the Dow hit 13,000 a year ago? lol

No but I didn't start any blaming him when the market crashed after 9/11.

I'm fucking with a guy who thinks everything wrong in the world has been caused by Obama in the last 45 days.

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions (Post 15613665)
Right but the uptick rule's been in effect since the 30's to 2007 and in all that time it hasn't really braked shorts in any fundamental way. The crash of 1987 still happened, people will still short stocks that they see have some real weakness. Bear raids of "perfectly healthy companies" are relatively rare considering the risk of shorting against the stock's fundamental strength.

I was just paraphrasing George Soros.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/49b1654a-e...0779fd2ac.html

Getting rid of naked shorting (where the vendor has not borrowed the stock in advance) has helped alleviate the downward pressure also. Without that, you could literally have more short bets against a company than it has shares outstanding.

Penthouse Tony 03-11-2009 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smax (Post 15609718)

:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123