![]() |
Tubes!!!!! Tubes!!!!! Tubes!!!!! Tubes!!!!!
Here we go again :
People/companies with large pockets are going to fight for a market share of traffic. This will never end. They are fighting by giving away free porn, this will never stop. The final model of the free porn site will eventually get here some day and it will work like this : A big company will open a studio/production company, put performers on salary, they will do between 3 and 10 shoots per day and post the entire full length videos on their website for free. Why??? Because "First you get the power then you get the money then you get the pussy". (Scar Face 1983) Traffic is the power. The big boys only want the power right now because when you have all the power the money has no where to flow except to you. So people who are still pissed at tube sites have a whole new level of being pissed comming their way in the future. Stop thinking about things that can not change and spend your time thinking about how to make something that works despite the existence of tube sites. I'm not looking for a flame here, but only trying to say that we have probably 1000 threads on this board with ideas of how to "bring down the tubes"; but I don't see threads about a website model that will survive regardless of tubes. That's the solution. |
if you are going to quote the legend, Tony Montana, please do it correctly..
"first you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the woman" k thnx......... |
dating programs need to stop prepaying ad deals, or they wouldnt be able to survive
|
Selling banner spots on tube site. hit me up!
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Woldn't that powerful traffic go back to tubes? |
Quote:
ran the site then they would never start asking for money but simply start accepting money for placements of ads. Look at your TV and figure it out; channel 2 evening News ain't asking you for shit are they? |
Quote:
Guess that's what I get for watching bootleg copies. I've been mis-quoting this shit for 20 years. :1orglaugh |
|
Quote:
And if the behaviour of the customer will change to the benefit of tube sites, I think the big porn companies will simply go and just buy those few big tube sites. It would be cheaper and more effective. |
You're partly wrong.
While free porn definitely is the future, sites mainly posting videos of salaried performers certainly aren't. Rather, tubes posting an ever-increasing amount of both exclusive and non-exclusive content are the way it will go, possibly with a bunch of free live cams thrown in for good measure. That provides both the quantity as well as the variety that is needed to compete. Just like many tv networks contract production studios and buy licenses for old shows, porn tubes will do the same. The shitty part: there's only room for a few dozen truly high-traffic tubes like this, since you need to be able to have a decent amount of content to compete. And competing on content with other tubes means you will need to match their investments. Of course, niches are another matter altogether. |
Quote:
works out the copyright theft problem? Will they pay for license of the content then and have everyone on the internet compete with the same content, or will they pay out the rear for exclusive content, or will they save money and be exclusive by using salaried production and performer staff? |
Quote:
|
Toooooobes
|
Quote:
A portion of the exclusive content will be produced in-house, but mostly with ever-changing performers without a contract. For some performers, of course, there will be contracts and salaries. The exclusive content will function to distinguish them from other sites and pull in traffic, while a vast database of cheap non-exclusive content will make sure that customers always have a reason to come back, and can always find something to their liking. Having the performers in most of the exclusive content under contract simply wouldn't be cost-effective, since concepts that aren't based around one or several female performers typically require lots of variety in models. The contracted performers will be the ones that now get their own sites - top quality models that are able to build a large following. |
Quote:
This post wasn't really about every detail about how to run the website. Just a notice that it's comming. Quote:
You seem to be looking at this on a micro scale as if you were going to launch this site. It will not be you unless you hit some $100million lottery. This company is going to have 5-10 million dollars a year to spend on performer talent alone! |
Quote:
You shouldn't compare these future tube sites to existing studios. Rather, you should compare them to large adult video shops, where virtually every customer is able to find tons of videos of his liking. Having tens of thousands of well-tagged non-exclusive scenes means most surfers will be able to find what they want ("black lesbians asslicking in threesomes"), meaning they will come back. Producing all of those yourself would cost both huge amounts of time and huge amounts of money, both of which are better spent elsewhere. For most of that content, having exclusive licenses with exclusively contracted models simply wouldn't bring in significant benefits. Only the models who could function as an actual independent product line would get exclusive contracts. Keep in mind, no matter what the content budget is, using a relatively small portion of the budget on non-exclusive content provides a very large amount of value in terms of quantity and variety. |
Quote:
No matter what way you slice it; this link here tells me something else : http://www.alexa.com/data/details/tr...sonblondes.com It tells me that their ranking would fucking explode if all that niche content were free. Dogfart brags that they spent $10million on content(which they did); but that was over about 10 sites. Spend 10 million on one site and free???? Some idiot or genius will ultimately do this. Only the final money will decide the idiot or genius title. |
Quote:
|
aren't you the guy who had a failed tube script cause you can't code
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
No one's debating that they could/couldn't add more content. I'm just saying it doesn't appear to even be needed. |
Sure I can be wrong.
This isn't any exact science. Good luck to those that "know" I'm wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't promote pay sites that have 200k old videos because the volume does not make me more sales than a small site with 100 exclusive videos. If you've had a different experience then I can see why you lean that way. Maybe we all try to analize this stuff too closely and draw conclusions that may be dependent on our unique situation. I wonder if playboy would be in trouble now if they had tried this. At one time they certainly had the money to do it. In playboy's case I would have gone your route for sure. There would be no point in risking their business buy producing all new content at first. So I see where you're heading, I just would prefer to come in to a game like this with all new content. I don't want old videos comming up the first day and veteran web sufers saying "ahh, new site but same stuff". |
Quote:
I did not mean any offense to you champ. |
I'm not a big fan of surfing tubes. Even with all the free shit a lot of it is just that shit.
|
Quote:
I would rather go buy it and get a decent quality version. :2 cents: |
Quote:
But I also don't surf TGPs either, never liked it. I always prefered a paysite and would surf a tgp only to find the latest paysite. |
And all of this changes when the govt. steps in and changes the laws. That is what is really coming. And it won't be a good thing either. It will take away the headache of the illegit tubes stealing content...but at the same time it's going to completely destroy free sites, and with the destruction of free sites comes the destruction of advertising outlets for our paysites. :( All it will take is just one international law requiring a credit card to view ANY sex act online and that will be that
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If free sites could only feature censored/non-nude content, conversions would go up so far your stats would make you jizz in your pants. Meanwhile, they'd still get traffic, since people looking for free stuff would still find the free sites even if they only featured teasing content. Honestly, if the industry had any sense, it would be trying to make this happen. |
you are a genius
|
Quote:
Some have no more connection to the adult biz other than being a designer, graphics person, programmer, billing solution, etc. Others are salesmen (affiliates) Others are performers and models. Some are photographers and videographers. Others are webmasters buying content for their generic paysites. Then there's guys like me who have been in the affiliate game for a long time, owned a content company, and now have an affiliate program and write, shoot, direct, edit and mastermind and maintain claudia-marie.com I don't need anybody to "regulate" me. But I know what you're trying to say. You're just speaking too broadly and generalizing. The people who are doing the dumb shit on the internet aren't even in the adult biz. Those clowns running bit torrent sites and illegit tubes are mostly people who have never even met a porn person...much less have any skin in the game. So I don't believe the REAL porn business has any hand in what is going to bring the govt. down upon us all. It's the fringe guys who are bloodsucking leaches trying to make a dollar without doing any work to earn it. :2 cents: |
Instead of being against something, be for something instead.......Thats the way the universe works
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
surfers are smarter than you give them credit for and regardless of how many big tubes are in the game, the surfers will gravitate toward the ones that give them the most stolen content for free..... all the wannabe hosted sites and legal content sites will not be able to compete very well
just like youtube in mainstream, the surfer wants to be able to hear of any girl or niche or video and go to the site, type it in the search, and voila have the video in front of them for free..... they can tell which ones deliver and which ones don't and as the months go by those sites are the ones that will prevail |
Quote:
|
I Hate Vast Simplification and Over Generalizations
Quote:
:2 cents: |
Quote:
And I really am not talking about what "they say" I'm talking about REALITY. The adult sex industry is comprised of many things. But to say that I'm in the same business as some guy who put up a tube script online and filled it with stolen content is bullshit. That is kinda like saying that some thief who steals a car is in the same business as the CEO of Ford. You are right about one thing...I AM a part of an industry. Just not the same one as some of the people we are being lumped in with. :) |
Quote:
but the tubes are getting better and better at covering all bases as the months go by 99.9% of surfers are quickly becoming satisfied by the offerings |
Quote:
honestly this looks like copying my statement I made in the thread about tgps.. http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...6&postcount=14 .. I believe AVS forced by laws would be the only good way things may change |
Quote:
I know that my members, patrons, those on boards I am members of, and myself make up more than that .1% of people who are not happy with tube offerings. I honestly think some members of the online business need to get out to more of the surfer boards and communities and actually read what people are saying. I am talking about true fan boards. Not theft boards. I obviously do not visit all niches because I do not understand, nor care for all of them. But I know even my mainstream, hardcore friends, and complete strangers I ask about tubes are not satisfied with the offerings. Some still prefer pictures and MPG for clarify, or will sign up for a site. |
Quote:
to have on the internet. Everything will have to go thru them to get to you. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc