GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Danish chemist finds nano-explosive in WTC dust (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=899349)

DVTimes 04-12-2009 06:47 PM

Danish chemist finds nano-explosive in WTC dust
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2tAlqZe6Y3g



Martin 04-12-2009 07:15 PM

Interesting..

d-null 04-12-2009 07:16 PM

this seems like it should be pretty big, why isn't it getting more news coverage here in north america ?

Ozarkz 04-12-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15736526)
this seems like it should be pretty big, why isn't it getting more news coverage here in north america ?

exactly. What is the media hiding?

mynameisjim 04-12-2009 07:51 PM

Does anyone know of this show, it is a legitimate news program like Meet the Press or like Inside Edition?

Not saying I don't believe it, just trying to get some context.

BusterBunny 04-12-2009 07:55 PM

stephen hawking was in vegas at the time so don't blame him:2 cents:

http://www.jaunted.com/files/8223/lido.jpg

DaddyHalbucks 04-12-2009 08:10 PM

Rubbish, watch the NOVA documentary on the WTC attack. It explains everything.

NOTHING, I repeat, NOTHING on any of the videos suggests any explosives were used.

Virtually everything in both buildings was reduced to a fine powder, with the exception of some structural steel. Of course you would expect aluminum, iron, etc.. in the remains. There was also hundreds of thousands of pounds of lead from the 100,000 computers in the building. There was also mercury from the tens of thousands of light bulbs, etc..

Pleasurepays 04-12-2009 08:11 PM

sure.. obviously someone snuck over 100 tons of explosives into the buildings, ran miles and miles of cable etc etc etc to create a controlled demolition. what else could it be? hijacked 757's fully loaded with fuel or something?

riddler 04-12-2009 08:13 PM

nano explosives? explosives so small they can blow up human cells??

riddler 04-12-2009 08:15 PM

what the fuck is nano thermite, goddamn the amount of rubbish conspiracy people babble is off the wall

Pleasurepays 04-12-2009 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riddler (Post 15736642)
what the fuck is nano thermite, goddamn the amount of rubbish conspiracy people babble is off the wall

its made from powdered aluminum and iron.

well.. since we all know the WTC was made from unicorn skin and midget tears... i think anyone could conclude that its very unreasonable that a collapsed sky scraper might produce these things.

riddler 04-12-2009 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 15736647)
its made from powdered aluminum and iron.

well.. since we all know the WTC was made from unicorn skin and midget tears... i think anyone could conclude that its very unreasonable that a collapsed sky scraper might produce these things.

i dont come from a chemistry background but powdered aluminum and iron is thermite and not nano, nano is a scale of a particle thats really fucking tiny, no?

sortie 04-12-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 15736633)
Rubbish, watch the NOVA documentary on the WTC attack. It explains everything.

NOTHING, I repeat, NOTHING on any of the videos suggests any explosives were used.

Virtually everything in both buildings was reduced to a fine powder, with the exception of some structural steel. Of course you would expect aluminum, iron, etc.. in the remains. There was also hundreds of thousands of pounds of lead from the 100,000 computers in the building. There was also mercury from the tens of thousands of light bulbs, etc..

He said "unreacted thermite" was found.

The explosion did not create fully intact thermite, I'm sure.

Lock at this video of the WTC. You can see what appears to be thermite burning.
No one can explain what else can burn like this.



https://youtube.com/watch?v=rOq3H...eature=related

riddler 04-12-2009 08:31 PM

and out come the retards.

Bossman 04-12-2009 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mynameisjim (Post 15736594)
Does anyone know of this show, it is a legitimate news program like Meet the Press or like Inside Edition?

Not saying I don't believe it, just trying to get some context.

Its was shown on the biggest news show/station in prime time (TV2 government-owned channel)... not sure if that makes it more legitimate.

mynameisjim 04-12-2009 08:41 PM

Well, he talks about nano thermite but later says some of the particles he found were 1mm in size, which is hardly nano. But he was just talking on a show so it's tough to figure out what exactly he meant, I would like to see the published report if there is a translation.

Agent 488 04-12-2009 08:44 PM

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...001/7TOCPJ.SGM

DaddyHalbucks 04-12-2009 08:58 PM

"Unreacted thermite" is simply aluminum and iron. And there were plenty of each in massive quantities in the buildings before the attack.

A 1 mm size particle is roughly a MILLION times larger than nano.

The guy is a kook.

Loch 04-12-2009 09:08 PM

you are all too damn smart to exist LMAO

Blingbaby 04-12-2009 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loch (Post 15736733)
you are all too damn smart to exist LMAO

Right? Who knew there were so many fucking Einsteins on GFY..

notime 04-13-2009 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budsbabes (Post 15736691)

Thanks for the this link with the published scientific paper.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 04-13-2009 02:32 AM

does anyone even speak this fucking language? for all i know they could be saying anything about 911, just because the english subs say this shit. who the fucks. news story for the tinfoil hat crowd plz? i'm too lazy to google

mule 04-13-2009 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 15737164)
does anyone even speak this fucking language? for all i know they could be saying anything about 911, just because the english subs say this shit. who the fucks. news story for the tinfoil hat crowd plz? i'm too lazy to google

The paper is in english. http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/ge...ile=7TOCPJ.pdf

seeandsee 04-13-2009 02:54 AM

osama did it, no way there is plant shit :)

dynastoned 04-13-2009 02:58 AM

they wont show this shit in north america because its taboo to even talk about it as you can see by a lot of the posts in this thread.

Shags 04-13-2009 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 15737164)
does anyone even speak this fucking language? for all i know they could be saying anything about 911, just because the english subs say this shit. who the fucks. news story for the tinfoil hat crowd plz? i'm too lazy to google

Subtitles match the content, legit news source.
:warning The Prof. is a member of the 9/11 truth movement…

Dirty F 04-13-2009 03:34 AM

fucking retards

SmokeyTheBear 04-13-2009 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mynameisjim (Post 15736686)
Well, he talks about nano thermite but later says some of the particles he found were 1mm in size, which is hardly nano. But he was just talking on a show so it's tough to figure out what exactly he meant, I would like to see the published report if there is a translation.

the paper mentions the grains being 100 nanometres

Bossman 04-13-2009 03:59 AM

The problem with the video is that the interviewer start to speculate on what the finding means, which is not an scientific enterprise, but speculative one.

They have clearly found nano thermite, but how it got there is another investigation... :2 cents:

Pleasurepays 04-13-2009 04:26 AM

the paper itself is obviously biased towards proving a point... not objectively analyzing "dust" to reveal what it might be... the language throughout it is about proving a demolition of the buildings happened. that's hardly a scientific or objective analysis.

The Duck 04-13-2009 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dynastoned (Post 15737219)
they wont show this shit in north america because its taboo to even talk about it as you can see by a lot of the posts in this thread.

:2 cents:

DVTimes 04-13-2009 04:42 AM

it was clear it was set up.

DVTimes 04-13-2009 04:45 AM

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...90406135508204


3. April 2009
By Thomas Hoffman
videnskab.dk
English (rough) translation via google translate

World Trade Center crashed perhaps gravel because someone had placed combustible nano materials in the buildings, and not because the two aircraft were throbbing in them. Analysis of the dust after the WTC has just published a scientific article, including Neils Harrit, a Danish chemist.


Photo: Asbestos and glass flew around New York streets when the Twin Towers collapsed after the attack on the World Trade Center 11 September 2001. Now it appears that these materials had company in the dust of højenergetisk material which might have melted the supporting structure of the Twin Towers. (Photo: Federal Emergency Management Agency)

It was apparently not only office equipment, walls and ceilings, which were pulverized and spread over large parts of Manhattan as the World Trade Center in 2001 was hit by two aircraft during a violent terrorist attacks against the United States.

The dust contained, according to a scientific article also traces of well-nanothermit - a custom-made material with so much energy that it can develop tremendous heat and be decidedly explosive (see box at the bottom of the article).

The chemical reaction forms the liquid metal, with temperatures around 2500 degrees Celsius may have melted the steel beams that were the core of the towers of the World Trade Center.

'Explosives into the World Trade Center'

The active nanothermit - also called superthermit - found by an international group through careful analysis of four different dust samples that were grouped together in Manhattan in New York in hours and days after the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001.

The spectacular performance has just published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal - a peer-reviewed journal that is freely available online. Peer review means that the analysis and findings in the article has been reviewed and endorsed by professional practitioners.

One of nine authors of the article is Niels Harrit, Associate Professor of Chemistry Institute of the University of Copenhagen.

"This is a purely technical breakthrough. This is the first time ever showing at the highest scientific level, that there were explosives in the World Trade Center, "said Niels Harrit to videnskab.dk.

Controlled demolition

According to Niels Harrit matches found for recordings from 11 September of liquid metal flowing out of the towers just before they collapse. And it explains why many weeks later, still lakes of molten iron in the rubble of the towers.

While the discovery offers a logical explanation of why the 400-meter high towers could overthrow vertically with a speed close to free fall, although they usually held up by solid steel structures that were built to withstand such. kolliderende fly . conflicting aircraft.

"Observations indicate that there is one other used nanothermit, and results from our analysis is entirely consistent with the fact that it was a controlled demolition of the towers," said Niels Harrit, adding that the explosive-like mixture may have been planted in the buildings.

'thermites can not come from the two planes. Nanothermit be like other explosives placed extremely close to the main beams, while the detonation can be controlled electronically, "says the Niels Harrit.


Photo: The group of authors have found such characteristic red / gray pieces ( 'chips') in all four dust samples were collected in New York immediately after the terrorist attacks 11 September. The red layers contain carbon, oxygen, aluminum, silicon and iron in a proportion according to the authors fit nanothermit. Splinter are magnetic. (Photo: Niels Harrit)

Traces of many tonnes of thermites

The most official study of the attack on the towers 11 September has not analyzed the ruins or dust for thermites, or traces of explosives.

National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded in its report that the molten metal include aluminum from the two planes and that there is not reason to believe that there was any kind of explosives or similar in the two towers.

The authors are really another. In the scientific article telling that a dust sample from which all visible pieces of glass and concrete stored at 0.1% nanothermite. The authors point out that a number of samples before they can provide figures on the total content of dust from the World Trade Center - but, according to Niels Harrit it appears that many tonnes of unreacted thermites "have been spread around in New York streets and apartments after the two towers collapse.

Good to destroy stock

Within the Danish military has a thorough knowledge of normal thermites. Head of explosive ordnance disposal service, Michael Krogh, calling it "a bit of a relic of the Cold War. He says that thermites are good - and is being used - to destroy the stock before it falls into enemy hands.

Michael Krogh unaware nano version, but he may just well imagine that it could be used to tear the building down.

DVTimes 04-13-2009 04:46 AM

http://www.breakthematrix.com/BreakT...d-Trade-Center

BOSS1 04-13-2009 04:55 AM

Test more(untampered) samples by independent labaratories all over the world ... then it can be peer reviewed and become 100% fact

TarPy 04-13-2009 05:46 AM

Well, throw in that dust of that size isn't created from a collapse, where things roughly break into large chunks...

It was a large flowing cloud of dust, extremely consistent with explosives that pulverize concrete into a fine powder. Individual computer boards were pulverized as well... We deal with circuit boards, you could drop any combination of steel and concrete on a computer and I don't see it turning to dust, but blow it up... and....


I mean, we're not the only government in the world that is or has made shit up. But there's definately less than a straight story coming from the government on this one...

We ever find the wings to that plane that make an O shaped hole in the pentagon, rather than the ---O--- shape that real planes have?

uh.. missle

pornguy 04-13-2009 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 15736635)
sure.. obviously someone snuck over 100 tons of explosives into the buildings, ran miles and miles of cable etc etc etc to create a controlled demolition. what else could it be? hijacked 757's fully loaded with fuel or something?

Yep... Totally agree... Im still trying to get my head around the claims that several of the people that were on those planes were later arrested in other countries.

crockett 04-13-2009 06:39 AM

OMG! The space aliens and Jews, are taking over the world and tha gheys are helping every body run!

BREAKING NEWS FLASH!

We landed men on the moon
Hitler is Dead
The space aliens have not been helping us since the 50's
The Jews only run Hollywood not the US govt
FEMA isn't gonna heard you up like cattle and put you in a death camp
The US govt didn't blow up the WTC

Never mind common sense we have the internets and youtube!

Dirty F 04-13-2009 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kandah (Post 15737307)
:2 cents:

Now lets wait for your buddy who will tell us the Simpsons and the Matrix are part of the conspiracy as well and all the retards are in this thread.

Fucking imbecile.

Dirty F 04-13-2009 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TarPy (Post 15737408)
Well, throw in that dust of that size isn't created from a collapse, where things roughly break into large chunks...

It was a large flowing cloud of dust, extremely consistent with explosives that pulverize concrete into a fine powder. Individual computer boards were pulverized as well... We deal with circuit boards, you could drop any combination of steel and concrete on a computer and I don't see it turning to dust, but blow it up... and....


I mean, we're not the only government in the world that is or has made shit up. But there's definately less than a straight story coming from the government on this one...

We ever find the wings to that plane that make an O shaped hole in the pentagon, rather than the ---O--- shape that real planes have?

uh.. missle

Holy shit...

We have a real expert here people. He just told us how everything happened. He just solved it!

TheDoc 04-13-2009 08:02 AM

He says red and blue chips... A desk (for example) that was made from aluminum, wouldn't have the same color through chemical reaction at the nano level.

The aluminum from a desk, could be looked at with dimension, and seen what impurity the element from aluminum 'ever' had on it - a mathematical print of it's history, making it a unique nano particle. It would react different with magnet fields and chemicals.

They can break it apart because the periodic table had depth, it's infinite like space on how it can be turned, flipped, etc and a perfect history of it is encoded into the particle.

So what they are doing is creating a chemical reaction (magnetic fields) that reacts only with the pure elements.

You guys are talking about what you 'see with your eyes'... If you take pure metal, you add in 1 nano sized drop of anything, the entire thing changes at the element level - and when you look at that at the nano level, you see the layers of change through chemical reactions.



This really isn't all that complex to understand. They should have only found trace amounts, mixed in with everything else. Rather, they found a noticeable amount with the human eye, and at the nano-level it's without question 'added into the equation'.

SuzzyQ 04-13-2009 08:50 AM

Here we go again....

Martin 04-13-2009 09:17 AM

What you need to take away from that video is that a new criminal investigation is needed into what happened on 9-11. How come there hasn't been one yet? Why is there nobody wanted for the biggest mass murder on US soil in history?

BradM 04-13-2009 09:19 AM

Tardpy and all the retards come out to play

JP-pornshooter 04-13-2009 10:59 AM

i am guessing this is a late aprils fools joke..
yes i understand the language, it seems very real but one thing really gave it away is when the guy says sometimes you can see the nano thermite, the larger bits can be 1mm and are red which makes them visible to the naked eye..
the interviewer certainly did not add any legitimacy to Niels's conspiracy theories.
on the other hand he concludes by saying that he believes it (the conspiracy) has to do with the hijackers but that there is more to it than we currently know.. and he hopes there will be a full police investigation to clearly determine how things happened..

Ozarkz 04-13-2009 11:05 AM

Nobody is saying the Government had to be involved.

What they are saying is it's a possibility explosives could have been used.

So because everyone is afraid of conspiracy theories no research should be done?

Come on.

In the real world educated people don't react by calling other people "Retards or dumb" that shit doesn't fly.

PSD CSS XHTML 04-13-2009 11:10 AM

There is some funny shit in this thread. You guys know that planes flew into these buildings? Big ones too. That's really the end of the story.

Martin 04-13-2009 11:12 AM



Lots of question still left unanswered.

PSD CSS XHTML 04-13-2009 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozarkz (Post 15738246)
Nobody is saying the Government had to be involved.

What they are saying is it's a possibility explosives could have been used.

So because everyone is afraid of conspiracy theories no research should be done?

Come on.

In the real world educated people don't react by calling other people "Retards or dumb" that shit doesn't fly.

I love a good conspiracy theory, and don't think for a second that my government doesn't have a million secrets, but nano explosives in the WTC. That really is tin foil hat time.

WarChild 04-13-2009 11:24 AM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123