Quote:
Originally Posted by Twistys Tim
(Post 15805520)
Female Komodo Dragons can reproduce without a male being present. The can produce a clutch of eggs that produces only male off spring, that they in-turn mate with to produce more females.
I think it is called parthenogenesis. But reptiles have a different chromosomal system to mamals.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6196225.stm
|
Exactly. But it's done because it has to be done that way and it took a long time in order for them to do it I'm sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradM
(Post 15805466)
Unless there is a drastic change in humanity whereby we need to critically adapt to those new conditions by asexually reproducing... that would be millions of years away at best.
(2,000 years in biblical times)
|
Oh, it would be thousands or millions of years no doubt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkland
(Post 15805465)
All kidding aside, I read an article a long time ago that animals in confinement without a sexual partner somehow switched to asexual reproduction. :2 cents:
|
Yes, some can change out of survival. It's unreal if you think about it, but it does happen, and that is the point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
(Post 15805427)
it wouldn't just be a question of physiology, it would be question of a substantial change in our psychological makeup
|
Agreed. But possible over time I believe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by candyflip
(Post 15805407)
Not impossible, but irrelevant today as it would be hundreds of thousands if not millions of years.
|
It is possible. Other life forms already do it. It would be relevant when the time came for it to be relevant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
(Post 15805380)
In short, I think it's _possible_ that human beings (Homosapiens) may one day end up being an ancestor to some sort of asexual species but as for Homosapiens macro evolving to being asexually reproductive, not very likely. Our genetic make up is taken half from the mother and half from the father. If one person could all by themselves reproduce, it'd be nothing more than cloning really.
|
It has with other life forms. I don't see why we couldn't do it. Sure, it's beyond anything that makes sense to any of us at this time BUT if you believe in evolution, the thought that we once lived in the water and were just an organism is equally if not more absurd of a thought. Yet is is accepted as fact if you believe in that theory.
Be it cloning or not, it would be what it would be.
So with that said, it has to start somewhere. That doesn't mean that it will survive time and end up being the next form of homosapiens, but it may try even if it fails. There has to be a point in time where it starts, a rough draft takes form, the fish crawls out of the water so to speak and onto land for the first time. I believe this first step is happening right now. A VERY crude and rough draft indeed but the first steps none the less.
|