|
XBIZ News: HIV 'Patient Zero' Tested Positive June 6
SHERMAN OAKS, Calif. ? AIM Healthcare has released details on the "Patient Zero" performer who tested positive for HIV.
Described by AIM administrator Brooke Hunter as "a video performer," the female performer tested positive from a blood draw on June 4. The results were received June 6. http://www.xbiz.com/news/109218 --t |
Damn. Sig spot.
|
I thought that AIM said it was not a major deal.
Wonder how they define that? |
Thats terrible news. Warm wishes to her and her family and loved ones.
|
Chronology: Tested June 4th
Did B/G Scene: June 5th Positive Test Result: June 6th AIM forced to release a statement: June 10th http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dcdi--LdAe...c/s400/wtf.jpg The male talent and the producing company should have checked to ensure that she was negative before letting her work, and she should not have worked without negative (clear) test results...stupidity all the way around!!! :disgust Wake the fuck up people!!! :mad: ADG |
Quote:
you're right - what's the point of going to a test when you work the next day but get the result one day after your work. this means: she worked on the 5th and the producer did not care for an actual test - congrats. :2 cents: |
I know two of the involved and my thoughts are with them. :-(
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thats AIM...always on top of things, leading the way... What a joke..BTW the "so called" Dr. Mitchell...what is she a doctor of? :2 cents: |
"We are finding that many clients, patients, and companies are tempted to discuss this delicate matter with the world for whatever personal or professional gain"
Someone should kick that Mitchell guy in the balls for stating that bullshit... pro or personal gain.. what a fucking douche. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is sad news. My prayers are with them all :(
|
Described by AIM administrator Brooke Hunter as "a video performer," the female performer tested positive from a blood draw on June 4. The results were received June 6. The performer's last negative test was April 29. She had previously been described as being in "a small number of films," which would explain the 36-day gap between tests.
It never mentioned anyone else that she might have worked with in May while her last negative test was valid. That means that she might have gotten infected sometime in and around the 29th. Or possibly before then and it was not detected--doesn't mean that she was not infected. The DNA/pcr test can detect within time of exposure to 3 weeks. She could have been infected up to 3 weeks before her last negative test--though unlikely and unlikely to pass it on. Am I missing something here? Did she not work at all during the month of May and did she not have sex with anyone during that time? She must have at least once, right? Also, what about the people she might have worked with or had sex with near her last test date? Not just industry... :2 cents: |
Quote:
exactly - and that's why i already said yesterday that the name needs to be put out to all agencies and producers to check with whom she has worked in the last 2 months. and in case anyone wonders why i care about this since i work in CZ: there are enough US perfomers coming over here to shoot and fuck everything off and on camera thats not fast enough up the trees. |
Keep in mind that the test results are not Gold Standard tests and are highly prone to error. High possibility that they are not positive at all if they only tested once.
|
This ain't going to go away fast.
|
Quote:
|
i took that statement out of my ass
|
the non poz part of my ass *
|
There's a non poz part?
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not so much concerned about a potential for a false positive, as much as Patient Zero worked before having a clear test, and that the producer and male talent, apparently didn't double-check or care, unless of course AIM mistakenly told everyone that Patient Zero was negative (clear) for HIV. I would like some clarification from AIM or the others involved, since we common producers are being kept in the dark by all concerned, since it's "no big deal"... ADG |
looks like Nina was right
|
Damn that is so fuck up
|
|
Quote:
If so, Brooke should put down the cock, and get in here and do some explaining... :2 cents: There have been lots more questions directed towards AIM, than answers coming from them, over the past few days. :disgust ADG |
It's going to get a lot worse
|
Sorry to hear this.
|
Quote:
Or, she may just have a GED. I get those all mixed up. |
Quote:
ADG |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd hit it? :Oh crap |
I dont know why people put so much trust in that testing anyway.
Many scientists have said that its not reliable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
She may have had a false negative test in April, spread the virus around on screen and off, then come back to test again only in June get a positive result. I'm shocked AIM has not taken this into consideration. Or... perhaps she did not work in May? |
Mitchells so called degree is NOT from an accredited University it has no more acredation than a degre from the "Mike south Institute of Insensitivity and Pornography"
her only formal paper is a GED And Far-L is right AIM does not use gold standard testing and they do get false positives from time to time, though with the test they use a false negative is more likely But it is my understanding the second test on Sat was positive as well and that they are now awaiting results of the confirmatory Western Blot test....though its probably already back |
HIV can be undetectable for up to 3 months after infection and it's transmittability is much higher within the first two weeks...
|
Best wishes to Brooke.
Although the names of people who have worked with her have not been released I would hope that if you worked with her you know now, and will go get tested. Also pass on the word to others you have worked with since. Best wishes to all of you. |
Quote:
ADG |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123