CNN.com leading with "Moon Landings Faked" story
 

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/spa...oax/index.html

:1orglaugh

here's the test take video

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Mythbusters have already debunked the debunkers. Anyone that thinks the moon landings were faked need to just kill themselves or at least make sure they don't breed. Also they should not be allowed to vote or have a job that has any degree of authority whatsoever. That includes being an assistant shift manager at a McDonald's

lol @ that video :1orglaugh

They definitely weren't faked,

but there were a few things that happened on that trip that haven't been openly talked about.

You can tell they weren't faked, because at one point you can see straight through one of the astronauts (can see through him to make out the edge of the moon) because of the radiation. (like an xray).

Yesterday's post...

http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/916356-moon-landing-real.html

:1orglaugh NICE:thumbsup

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xcUskQ-VRT...20/c-rock6.jpg


letter C on the rock (thats gotta be a prop)

the landing wasnt fake.
next topic.

Mythbusters? Well shit, why didn't you say so in the first place! I mean, a non-scientific TV show on the Discovery Network debunked it, so they must be right.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yeah because the letter "C" is such an incredibly unique shape that nothing occurring naturally could ever duplicate it randomly.

Pornstar69 is currently working the fries station at his local McDonalds. I think its important for him to realize at this point that he doesn't qualify for the assistant shift manager position. He's still young, hopefully this will help him redirect his energy towards a different attainable goal.

Spot on from Aldrin himself:

Of course that won't be enough evidence. These retards will simply claim it's more NASA trickery. It wouldn't matter to them in the least if the Russians went to the moon, came back and said "Yeah, you know, we did find all that American gear up there. Here's some we brought back, here's the video, here's the photos". All of a sudden the Russians, who arguably had the most to lose by the timing of the US moon landing, were actually in on it. No amount of evidence will ever suffice for these lunatics.

So there are people who think its not possible for us to get to the moon?

:1orglaugh

you would think that the original high res video of the moon landing would be something that the us government would want to save for the archives.. but no, they just wrote over the tapes with random shit.

how convenient

:2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

For once we completely agree. :thumbsup

If the landings were faked, don't you think the Soviets would have broadcast that little item to the world decades ago?

the landing was faked, everyone who tells you otherwise is a government-hired propagandist, including the myth busters.

that's not convenient, that's not conspiracy, that's typical us gov idiocy.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!


:1orglaugh

if they want to go back to the moon, why design a new shuttle?

what's wrong with the original one? seemed to work fine.

if they're that strapped, they'd just retrofit the tech they already have, namely, what already worked!

Punching some dude out that questions if it occurred is the greatest proof of all.


"SPEAK"

Of course not. The US government and the Soviet party were just shills for the Illuminati, who faked the entire cold war to distract the world from their lizard overlords.

Everyone knows that :1orglaugh

I liked the last bit.

""Will the LRO's incredibly high-resolution images of the lunar surface, including, eventually, the Apollo landing sites, finally quell the lunacy of the Moon Hoax believers? Obviously it won't," writes astronomer Phil Plait in his blog on Discover magazine's Web site. "These true believers don't live in an evidence-based world." "

That's weird. Here I thought it was real all this time :Oh crap

Several Cosmonauts did talk about it years ago, claiming that in there pre-lunar-missions a dozen comrades burned up in the Van Allen Belts, but during the time not a lot of US people we're reading Pravda so we didn't hear about it.

Having said that, it was probably Russian propaganda in the first place intended to frustrate the US and put doubt in the minds of millions abroad.

6% shows that 6% of Americans are flat out retarded. Glad its a low number lol

WE LANDED ON THE MOON. FACT

I believe, although I don't have it right in front of me now, but I believe Van Allen himself later went on to say that people would be able to travel rabidly through the belt.

Yes, well what should serve as clear cut evidence for anyone with any common sense has already been debunked. It's simple. When you present evidence like this, that answer is that it's just a lie. Have you ever aimed a laser and measured it being reflected? If the answer is no, then it's obviously just a fib you've been sold. Please try opening up your mind isntead of believing everything you've been told.

This is why I do not donate to Africa ever. I've never been there myself and I don't believe it actually exists as a result.

Yep the point was that the cosmonauts or Russian propaganda machine cited the Van Allen Belts as the major barrier (not me). Whereas these days we know there are few places in the belt that are really dangerous. It's a matter of passing through at the right time and the right area to only suffer a minimum of radiation exposure.

Apollo program researchers have debated back and forth - did NASA really have the equipment at the time to know where and when to pass through the belts in order not to fry and I tend to think they winged it!

These guys we're test pilots. A special breed of crazy that can somehow remain cool at all times.

For instance:
Buzz Aldrin was turning his bulky spacesuit around in the small confines of the lunar module and fucking broke off the GO HOME switch. So when it was time to get home he triggered the ascent engine with a Bic pen. Otherwise they would have been stranded on the moon.

Neil Armstrong was flight testing a lunar lander prototype back on earth pre flight. The thing takes a nasty nosedive on him so he bails seconds before it explodes in a big ball of fire. The time of ejection was 60 meters

What does he say later when asked how does it feel to survive that crash?
"It's always sad when a good machine goes down."

These dudes winged it.

:thumbsup

I'm told that the scientists that run the earth-based experiments (i.e. the ones that shoot the lasers), are - typically - happy to receive anyone who wants to stop by for a chat. I imagine that you could probably get a demonstration out of them, too, provided you stop by at the right time.

hehe... but by that point, I imagine that any "free-thinking" individual would have to realize that it could all be an elaborate front that the governments (all 5 or 6 of them) put up to convince those of weaker resolve. :winkwink: :1orglaugh

Exactly which "science" is the tin foil hat club using?

I think you missed the point completely. My point was that you were using some goofy show on TV as your 'proof'. You might as well point at a flower or rock on the ground and say that they told you it was true.

funny it only "happened" only once. You would think by 2009 they would go back, but noooooo...

Why give a crap if we did or didn't land on the moon or if it's fake or not?

30 years and people act like it matters or ever made a difference. It's the moon people - forget about it unless someone sticks a giant laser on top of it.

All I will say is this, if the Russians or japanese or Americans could go to the moon, we would have already set up walls and started claiming craters for countries who occupy them. I wont go as far as to claim the landings were faked, but some questions still arise in my mind of why articles even today claim Japanese and Russians are studying our landing area from photos but somehow we were trying to "beat" them to the moon before, how come they havent gone and showed us they can do it too?

I find it really astouding that with the technology we have today that no other country has done what we claim to have done decades ago.

this has been my single question to all who claim the landings are 100% real, not even just us, lets say we spent all our money and it would take us 30 years to build another spaceship.... how come if the Russians and japs were so close in the 60s, why havent they gone too?

hell of a lot of balls

Good to see you again.

Even if nothing is there? (BTW, we have been there about 6 times)

It didn't only happen once, there were six manned Apollo missions to the moon.

I know I personally meant, like in my lifetime lol I read article this morning that says as more of us who werent alive when they did it come of age, we are the question askers, not the old fogies who were around then.

You do realize that 97% of conspiracies retards are Obama voters like you?

That's the bar you judge things by? Whether or not it happened when you were around?

the president can't get a blow job in secret, you think the moon landing could have been kept quiet this long?