GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Photographers ----> inside (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=921293)

Mutt 08-12-2009 08:44 AM

Photographers ----> inside
 
i love this style of photography - looks like old Polaroid film, is this a plugin you think or a photog shooting with an old camera and film?

http://modelmayhm-7.vo.llnwd.net/d1/...ed25f2ee10.jpg

MaDalton 08-12-2009 08:50 AM

looks cool

The Duck 08-12-2009 08:50 AM

Hit me up and ill share a photoshop action that does this.

Mutt 08-12-2009 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 16174737)
Hit me up and ill share a photoshop action that does this.

thanks - but i know PS plug-ins that do it. it just seems cheesey to use a plug-in.

tony286 08-12-2009 08:53 AM

http://www.alienskin.com/exposure/index.aspx

dyna mo 08-12-2009 08:53 AM

lomo baby!

http://shop.lomography.com/shop/

dyna mo 08-12-2009 08:56 AM

i've been a big fan of lomography for a while now- love it!

http://www.emmajanenation.com/wp-con...3/seascene.jpg

Mutt 08-12-2009 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 16174761)
i've been a big fan of lomography for a while now- love it!

http://www.emmajanenation.com/wp-con...3/seascene.jpg

i like LOMO too but i don't think the photos i posted are LOMO - you don't see the vignette effect with the dark corners in the photos i posted.

yuu.design 08-12-2009 09:05 AM

Niiice pics :)

dyna mo 08-12-2009 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 16174784)
i like LOMO too but i don't think the photos i posted are LOMO - you don't see the vignette effect with the dark corners in the photos i posted.

i don't believe all lomo pics have the dark corners. but i am just guessing, the original pics do have a polaroid vibe

lomo:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...raphy-quad.jpg

raven1083 08-12-2009 09:09 AM

thanks for sharing! very nice photos.

MikeFold 08-12-2009 09:10 AM

I like that effect too...
Back in the "old days" before digital, I used to intentionally overexpose the film, and when I processed it (I owned a photolab for years) I would intentionally set the OverEx bias on the Printer/Enlarger to lean a bit cyan. (plus, the paper characteristics always seemed to bias that way, especially when you shoot into the sun.

http://www.gatefold.com/old_pic.jpg

this is a scanned pic from 1980 or so that this thread reminded me of.

DWB 08-12-2009 09:16 AM

Yes, I think it's called Virtual Photographer. It has a lot of options and I do believe this is one of them. It's free!

DWB 08-12-2009 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeFold (Post 16174819)
I like that effect too...
Back in the "old days" before digital, I used to intentionally overexpose the film, and when I processed it (I owned a photolab for years) I would intentionally set the OverEx bias on the Printer/Enlarger to lean a bit cyan. (plus, the paper characteristics always seemed to bias that way, especially when you shoot into the sun.

http://www.gatefold.com/old_pic.jpg

this is a scanned pic from 1980 or so that this thread reminded me of.

That is a bad ass photo. :thumbsup

sinclair 08-12-2009 09:22 AM

looks a little too "clean" to be an old camera, my vote is it it's a plugin. It's a very trendy style these days I am starting to see it everywhere.

Sinclair

MikeFold 08-12-2009 09:25 AM

thanks DWB

i had 'skills' in the old days
:thumbsup

Twistys Tim 08-12-2009 09:33 AM

It looks like it is under exposed by around 2/3 to a full stop.

Great Shooter 08-12-2009 09:36 AM

Yeah to artsy... lets all turn our porn into modelmayhem

Sarah_Jayne 08-12-2009 09:38 AM

anybody know if photoshop plugins/filters can work with Photoimpact? Yes, I know I could just use Photoshop but I have been a Photoimpact user for too long now.

Twistys Tim 08-12-2009 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twistys Tim (Post 16174913)
It looks like it is under exposed by around 2/3 to a full stop.

In addition to this, it appears to be spot metered for the foreground / shadow to allow the background to be over exposed in regards to the under exposure of the foreground.

tranza 08-12-2009 10:16 AM

I think it can be made with both!

NaughtyRob 08-12-2009 11:23 AM

Looks like overexposed shots at dusk.

quantum-x 08-12-2009 11:28 AM

I'll throw my opinion in the ring - it's digital..
the clarity of some of the snaps (esp bottom left), at least to me, give away that it's digital.

Seems to me that you could acheive it by tweaking the curves slightly - hollowing out the shadow saturation, bumping the exposure, and pushing more red / yellow through.

Twistys Tim 08-12-2009 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GetNaughty (Post 16175403)
Looks like overexposed shots at dusk.

Over exposure would increase contrast -- these images are flat and without contrast, and are under exposed.

MikeFold 08-12-2009 11:48 AM

tried to alter one taken at dusk (from a print, not digital)
http://www.gatefold.com/newer_pic_1.jpghttp://www.gatefold.com/newer_pic_2.jpg

not too good...still think it is an older style film shot

MikeFold 08-12-2009 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twistys Tim (Post 16175464)
Over exposure would increase contrast -- these images are flat and without contrast, and are under exposed.


Tim, I think you are right (assuming its a digital pic)
I found one that I screwed up on...

http://www.gatefold.com/kat.jpg

This looks like what Mutt was referring to....


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123