GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Neil Armstrong Now Admits Moon-Landing Was A Hoax (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=925871)

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 09-04-2009 06:48 PM

Neil Armstrong Now Admits Moon-Landing Was A Hoax
 
My faith in science was shaken today after I read this:

Quote:

LEBANON, OHIO?Apollo 11 mission commander and famed astronaut Neil Armstrong shocked reporters at a press conference Monday, announcing he had been convinced that his historic first step on the moon was part of an elaborate hoax orchestrated by the United States government.

According to Armstrong, he was forced to reconsider every single detail of the monumental journey after watching a few persuasive YouTube videos, and reading several blog posts on conspiracy theorist Ralph Coleman's website, OmissionControl.org.
"It only took a few hastily written paragraphs published by this passionate denier of mankind's so-called 'greatest technological achievement' for me to realize I had been living a lie, " said a visibly emotional Armstrong, addressing reporters at his home.

"It has become painfully clear to me that on July 20, 1969, the Lunar Module under the control of my crew did not in fact travel 250,000 miles over eight days, touch down on the moon, and perform various experiments, ushering in a new era for humanity. Instead, the entire thing was filmed on a soundstage, most likely in New Mexico."

"This is the only logical interpretation of the numerous inconsistencies in the grainy, 40-year-old footage," Armstrong added.

Amstrong was swayed by OmissionControl's use of bolding and capital letters to highlight NASA's many blatant fallacies.

Although Armstrong said he "could have sworn" he felt the effects of zero gravity while soaring out of the Earth's atmosphere and through space, he now believed his memory must be flawed. He also admitted feeling "ashamed" that he had failed to notice the rippling of the American flag he and Buzz Aldrin planted on the surface, blaming his lack of awareness on the bulkiness of the spacesuit and his excitement about traveling to the "moon."

"That rippling is not possible in the vacuum of space," Armstrong said. "It must have been the wind from an air-conditioning duct that I didn't recognize because you can't hear a damn thing inside those helmets."

"This is all just common sense, people," he added. "It's the moon. You can't land on the moon."

In a symbolic display of his newfound skepticism, Armstrong then grabbed a collection of moon rocks he had kept as souvenirs and dramatically dumped them into a trash can.
One of the main arguments posited on Coleman's website?that America could not, in 1969, have realistically possessed the technological capabilities needed to put a man on the moon?was reportedly one of the first things to cause the legendary astronaut a pang of doubt. Despite having spent thousands of hours training for the historic mission under the guidance of the world's top scientists, technicians, and pilots, Armstrong said he knew the conspiracy theories were true after learning that website author Coleman was "quite the engineering buff."

"Yes, at the time I thought those thousands of NASA employees were working round the clock for the same incredible goal, but if anyone would know what was really going on, it would be Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said of the 31-year-old part-time librarian's assistant. "He knows a lot more about faked moon landings than I ever could. He's been researching the subject on the Internet for years."

"Literally years," he added.

Addressing another inconsistency brought to light by OmissionControl, Armstrong explained he was probably so focused on piloting the lunar module that he failed to notice that one of the moon rocks visible in footage of the landing appears to have the letter 'C' stamped on it. An emotional Armstrong said that the only possible explanation for this detail was that the rock actually came from NASA's prop department.

"They forgot to turn it over," Armstrong said, removing his eyeglasses to wipe away tears. "Those lying bastards at NASA went through all the trouble to fake the moon landing, but they forgot to turn over one little prop rock. And now the whole damn thing's blowing up in their faces."

Although Armstrong initially questioned why the U.S. would attempt such an elaborate cover-up, he cited one overarching explanation provided by Coleman: that it was a ploy to defeat the Soviet Union and fulfill the Illuminati's plan to unify the world's banks and control the dissemination of information.

"Just ask Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said. "He'll answer any questions you have."

To conclude the press conference, Armstrong showed reporters footage of his first steps on the moon to demonstrate that the most daming evidence was "right under our noses." Speeding up the tape and replaying the graceful moonwalk several times in a row, Armstrong explained that the iconic images of humanity's triumphant dance with the cosmos was actually just a film of him walking backwards, slowed down, and played in reverse.

"What other explanation could there be?" Armstrong asked. "It's all right here. Everything is all right here if you'd just open your damn eyes and see!"

Added Armstrong, "I suppose it really was one small step for man, one giant lie for mankind."
http://www.myptsmail.com/travis/blog...et-science.jpg

Amazing... :Oh crap

ADG

shimmy2 09-04-2009 06:53 PM

"space may be the final frontier, but its made in a hollywood basement"

- red hot chili peppers, californication

ModelPerfect 09-04-2009 06:57 PM

It was the news report that was faked, not the landing. It was originally published in a fake news site, the onion, and later reprinted accidentally as real by a couple of newspapers, for which they apologized.

Original:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news...convinces_neil
Follow Up:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...-landing-spoof

Agent 488 09-04-2009 06:57 PM

yeah the onion is pretty funny sometimes.

NinjaSteve 09-04-2009 06:58 PM

I love these articles

Bangladeshi papers tripped up by 'Onion' moon spoof
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline...oon-spoof.html

The Onion Keeps On Embarrassing Newspapers
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/04...ng-newspapers/

AaronM 09-04-2009 06:59 PM

Nevermind. :glugglug

woj 09-04-2009 06:59 PM

:1orglaugh

Penthouse Tony 09-04-2009 07:00 PM

Didn't Neil just punch someone over this? ADG you better hide.

Elli 09-04-2009 07:02 PM

"Amstrong was swayed by OmissionControl's use of bolding and capital letters to highlight NASA's many blatant fallacies."

heheh well put :)

Cyber Fucker 09-04-2009 07:04 PM

→ fail ←

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 09-04-2009 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 16279665)
Didn't Neil just punch someone over this? ADG you better hide.

That was all part of the cover-up - if you watch this video in slow motion, Armstrong pulled his punch...they do it in Hollywood all the time:



One of these day's Alice...to the MOON!!!

ADG

ShellyCrash 09-04-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

According to Armstrong, he was forced to reconsider every single detail of the monumental journey after watching a few persuasive YouTube videos, and reading several blog posts on conspiracy theorist Ralph Coleman's website, OmissionControl.org.
"We've been had.":1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

burntfilm 09-04-2009 07:32 PM

the onion wins again!

Darkland 09-04-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ModelPerfect (Post 16279658)
It was the news report that was faked, not the landing. It was originally published in a fake news site, the onion, and later reprinted accidentally as real by a couple of newspapers, for which they apologized.

Original:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news...convinces_neil
Follow Up:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...-landing-spoof

Just goes to show you how stupid people are and how fucking worthless the news media is this day and age. But guess what, we have something to look forward too. People are only getting dumber and if you couldn't pick up on the tongue in cheek way that article was written you are completely lost.

Like:
"According to Armstrong, he was forced to reconsider every single detail of the monumental journey after watching a few persuasive YouTube videos, and reading several blog posts on conspiracy theorist Ralph Coleman's website, OmissionControl.org."

and

"Amstrong was swayed by OmissionControl's use of bolding and capital letters to highlight NASA's many blatant fallacies."

or how about....

"In a symbolic display of his newfound skepticism, Armstrong then grabbed a collection of moon rocks he had kept as souvenirs and dramatically dumped them into a trash can."

and even...

"That rippling is not possible in the vacuum of space," Armstrong said. "It must have been the wind from an air-conditioning duct that I didn't recognize because you can't hear a damn thing inside those helmets."

I guess you get the point... Idiocracy just scored another point.

baddog 09-04-2009 08:04 PM

What is really funny is the number of GFYer's that are going to accept this as final proof that it was a hoax.

JFK 09-04-2009 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 16279813)
What is really funny is the number of GFYer's that are going to accept this as final proof that it was a hoax.

its NOT ??:Oh crap

VeriSexy 09-04-2009 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ModelPerfect (Post 16279658)
It was the news report that was faked, not the landing. It was originally published in a fake news site, the onion, and later reprinted accidentally as real by a couple of newspapers, for which they apologized.

Original:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news...convinces_neil
Follow Up:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...-landing-spoof

dohhhhhhhh

Loryn 09-04-2009 09:23 PM

I can't believe I even read that crap...:1orglaugh

My God the length people will go through to not believe what is actually there and believe what is not there...but at least they can be entertaining at moments...:winkwink:

Voodoo 09-04-2009 09:24 PM

The moon doesn't exist. It's just the other side of the sun.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 09-04-2009 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voodoo (Post 16280035)
The moon doesn't exist. It's just the other side of the sun.

NASA actually is planning a manned mission to the Sun.

During a Senate hearing, a Senator asked the NASA officials how much it would cost, and how that would even be possible, and a NASA official responded by saying that the final figures weren't yet determined, but how they would accomplish the feat is by landing at night.

The proposal sailed through the Committee...

Actually, The Onion has been following the Moon Landing story for a long time. Here is a picture of the cover from the day of the "purported" moon landing, on July 21, 1969:


http://robertbenson.com/blog/wp-cont.../moon_tiny.jpg

Apparently, even The Onion was initially duped... :helpme

ADG

justinsain 09-04-2009 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 16279665)
Didn't Neil just punch someone over this? ADG you better hide.


That was Buzz Aldrin.

The second man to step foot on the moon.

http://www.thewoop.com/public_html/p...uzz_Aldrin.jpg

Dirty Dane 09-04-2009 10:55 PM

Which moon?

justinsain 09-04-2009 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane (Post 16280199)
Which moon?

The moon of Uranus

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 09-05-2009 04:13 AM

Prevent Klingons (cling ons) from invading Uranus (you're anus)...wipe them out!!!


http://www.thepeoplescube.com/images...utt_Uranus.jpg


Okay, enough of this nonsense - it's time to focus on football:


http://wagthedog.files.wordpress.com...ingleberry.jpg


ADG

Pics Traffic 09-05-2009 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 16279813)
What is really funny is the number of GFYer's that are going to accept this as final proof that it was a hoax.


Isn't it funny how a 60 year old man spends 10 hours a day posting on a board with those guys.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc