Seriously, if you think that 9/11 was a US government conspiracy...
 

why then doesn't Bin Laden come up and say that he didn't do it?

if he hates the US that much, the damage he could do by exposing 9/11 as an inside job would be much higher than just destroying the WTC. he has to hide since then, the US is bombing the places where he might be back into stone age, thousands of civilians got killed in that process. he could easily stop the hunt on him AND damage the NATO and US government by simply saying "i didn't do it"

so, why does he take the blame for something that was an inside job of the US government? :upsidedow

An equally interesting angle would be the insurance companies involved bringing up any reason to delay or not pay claims.


.

Perhaps your biggest mistake is trying to use logic with conspiracy theorists.

maybe he he was INVENTED as a scape goat and everybody is on a wild goose chase (or ghost chase)

I think he's dead already.

He did say he didn't do it. In fact I think he praised those who did if I remember correctly in the same "release."

Because he is part of the conspiracy, working with the goverment :anon

(I have actual read that somewhere :1orglaugh )

It's no secret that Osama was a CIA asset all the way up to 9-11. It's also no secret that he was last publicly seen at an American hospital in the presence of CIA and military. Al Qaeda‎ itself was a CIA operation. Al Qaeda‎ means "the database" used to track the Mujahadeen.

Err.. I think you meant osama.

because:

he is a cia asset.
or the videos where he does admit it are faked.
or does not exist at all and was created by the US to stir up hatred towards muslims.

come on man brush up on your theories.

Thanks. Obama worked for a CIA operation just out of college too though :) Very likely a CIA asset as well.

I think it's all about money and power. Lot's of things are not visual or known for the public and the hawks are manipulating the world and economy.

Some things we will never know. For sure starting and continue wars is a big money maker and obviously some people did fill their pockets.

What I think quite strange is that after 9/11 the Saudi government and other people from that region invested heavily in the US.

Me too. :2 cents:

If Osama is dead and the masses are told about it then our goverment will have to go through all the trouble of creating a new boogie man.

Oh wait, here you go.....

http://www.fightforsam.com/site/images/ahmadinejad3.jpg

Speaking of dead and "conspiracy theories," I'm all shook up.

Has Osama Bin Laden been dead for seven years -
and are the U.S. and Britain covering it up to continue war on terror?


By Sue Reid
Last updated at 10:59 PM on 11th September 2009

The last time we heard a squeak from him was on June 3 this year.
The world's most notorious terrorist outsmarted America by releasing a menacing message as Air Force One touched down on Saudi Arabian soil at the start of Barack Obama's first and much vaunted Middle East tour.
Even before the new President alighted at Riyadh airport to shake hands with Prince Abdullah, Bin Laden's words were being aired on TV, radio and the internet across every continent.

It was yet another propaganda coup for the 52-year-old Al Qaeda leader. In the audiotape delivered to the Arab news network Al Jazeera, Bin Laden said that America and her Western allies were sowing seeds of hatred in the Muslim world and deserved dire consequences.

It was the kind of rant we have heard from him before, and the response from British and U.S. intelligence services was equally predictable.

They insisted that the details on the tape, of the President's visit and other contemporary events, proved that the mastermind of 9/11, America's worst ever terrorist atrocity, was still alive - and that the hunt for him must go on.

Bin Laden has always been blamed for orchestrating the horrific attack - in which nearly 3,000 people perished - eight years ago this week. President George W. Bush made his capture a national priority, infamously promising with a Wild West flourish to take him 'dead or alive'.

The U.S. State Department offered a reward of $50million for his whereabouts. The FBI named him one of their ten 'most wanted' fugitives, telling the public to watch out for a left-handed, grey-bearded gentleman who walks with a stick.

Fake? Bin Laden two months later, when he was supposedly dead

Yet this master terrorist remains elusive. He has escaped the most extensive and expensive man-hunt in history, stretching across Waziristan, the 1,500 miles of mountainous badlands on the borders of Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Undeterred, Barack Obama has launched a fresh operation to find him. Working with the Pakistani Army, elite squads of U.S. and British special forces were sent into Waziristan this summer to 'hunt and kill' the shadowy figure intelligence officers still call 'the principal target' of the war on terror.
This new offensive is, of course, based on the premise that the 9/11 terrorist is alive. After all, there are the plethora of 'Bin Laden tapes' to prove it.

Yet what if he isn't? What if he has been dead for years, and the British and U.S. intelligence services are actually playing a game of double bluff?
What if everything we have seen or heard of him on video and audio tapes since the early days after 9/11 is a fake - and that he is being kept 'alive' by the Western allies to stir up support for the war on terror?

Incredibly, this is the breathtaking theory that is gaining credence among political commentators, respected academics and even terror experts.

Of course, there have been any number of conspiracy theories concerning 9/11, and it could be this is just another one.
But the weight of opinion now swinging behind the possibility that Bin Laden is dead - and the accumulating evidence that supports it - makes the notion, at the very least, worthy of examination.

The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz0QuWhSjNl

He must be a paid member of the Bush - Schroeder - Putin cartel.:thumbsup

i think at the very least, the top levels of the us govt allowed the attack to happen... :2 cents:

Bin Laden is a myth.

... and 100 other countries are strucked by same terrorists. Damn, the government behind that cover-up must be quite powerful :1orglaugh

USA make it, i think.

What's that upper-right one, his high school yearbook picture? :1orglaugh

Britney Spears can't take a shit without 20 magazines covering it, but in a worldwide conspiracy that must involve thousands of people everyone stays silent. i'm not quite sure if i can believe that

That's because there's no money in a photo of Bin Laden. Time Magazine pays less than People Magazine.

Why would he want to damage NATO and US government?? :) Bush and his politics is probably the best thing that ever happened to Bin Laden and terrorists around the world.

USA and Bin Laden (Islamic terrorism) are two faces of the same evil. They feed off each other and couldn?t exist without each other.

He did, right after 9-11. Google "bin laden denies 9-11"

Also, are you aware of the Bush/Bin Laden/CIA ties? It goes back years.

Just for the record, I don't believe this was a Government Conspiracy. I do believe there was more people involved then just a bunch on pissed off muslims though.

Here is a better question...

How come our government, that could find Saddam in a spider hole in the middle of nowhere not find a guy that has a huge entourage, constantly taunts us, and who has a lot of haters. Better yet, why can't we find him after we've captured so many of his top people?

How come people won't accept the "rouge employee" excuse in adult but will believe it when the most secret agency in the world pulls it. An agency known for deceiving citizens, nonetheless. An agency with a multi-billion dollar classified budget where Congress doesn't even know where they spend it.

It's a simple thing to hold an opinion based on the fact that you are opposed by what you call 'conspiracy theorists'.

It's a more intelligent thing to understand the definition of 'conspiracy'.

first and foremost I am aware that in both cases - Bin Laden/Taliban and Iraq - the US delivered the weapons and the CIA provided training in their wars against Russia and Iran.

just to have a couple of years later exactly those weapons pointed at their own soldiers.


nevertheless - i don't believe that a conspiracy of this size is possible without anyone involved saying a word - and it must have been at least hundreds of people involved to carry this out.

but: i can believe that some people knew what was going to happen and let it happen - just like it is said for Pearl Harbour

Bin Laden/Al-Qaeda‎ are CIA assets. Old news.

:thumbsup

:2 cents::2 cents: