GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Flower Tucci?s Exclusive Deal Was a Rich One, Court Papers Show (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=927931)

DVTimes 09-15-2009 04:37 PM

Flower Tucci?s Exclusive Deal Was a Rich One, Court Papers Show
 
LOS ANGELES ? Adult performer Flower Tucci breached her contract with Reality Kings and LLL Advertising after an LLL contractor noticed her name on an Elegant Angel call sheet, according to court papers filed last week.
Tucci, who is suing Reality Kings and other defendants over trademark infringement and cybersquatting claims, said she discussed with the companies her intention not to be solely exclusive when she signed the January 2007 deal.

That deal commenced in December 2006 and was agreed to the following month at a dinner during the AEE convention in Las Vegas, according to documents filed in Reality Kings and LLL?s reply to her opposition to dismiss the suit.

The Reality Kings/LLL deal was a rich one for Tucci, who has acknowledged that she was to receive ?two times? the industry standard fee for her services, a $5,000 signing bonus and a new necklace.

As the case continues to heat up, Reality Kings and LLL have asked a judge to again dismiss the suit, claiming that Tucci is making ?untruthful assertions,? that she wasn?t pressured into signing an exclusive performance agreement that she calls ?improper,? and that she legally didn?t own websites operating with variations of her stage name.

Tucci?s suit alleges that the defendants registered and operated a number of websites ? FlowerTucci.com, FlowerTucciPix.com, FlowerTucciNude.com and Club-FlowerTucci.com, among others ? and are exploiting them without her permission.

In many instances, Tucci?s suit says, the sites lead back to FlowerTucci.com, which allegedly is owned by Miami Beach-based Reality Kings, known formally as RK Netmedia.

Tucci, whose real name is Carole Molloy, registered her stage name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 2007 after working about five years in the adult industry. She has appeared in more than 400 adult videos and starred in the Showtime TV series ?Family Business.?

The suit targets a laundry list of companies and individuals, including studio Scorching Sands Inc., hosting company Net227 Inc., registrar NameCheap, as well as webmasters T. Kgels, Adam Nalepowski and Michael Puskarz.

http://www.xbiz.com/news/112775

bloggerz 09-15-2009 04:40 PM

The Reality Kings/LLL deal was a rich one for Tucci, who has acknowledged that she was to receive “two times” the industry standard fee for her services, a $5,000 signing bonus and a new necklace.

Barefootsies 09-15-2009 04:40 PM

Interesting read.

Sig.

Sly 09-15-2009 04:44 PM

Net 227 isn't a hosting company, LOL.

GrouchyAdmin 09-15-2009 04:51 PM

I'm going to sue everyone who has the words 'Grouchy', 'Admin', any combination thereof or separately as it is infringing on my moniker.

fris 09-15-2009 04:51 PM

big time lulz

ToplistBlog_Com 09-15-2009 04:52 PM

That's quite a bit of moola.

DVTimes 09-15-2009 04:56 PM

It says the agrrement was in Jan 2007, and that she registered her stage name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 2007. So I presume that was after Jan.

So I presume they bought her website before she registered her name.

Monique Niccole 09-15-2009 06:53 PM

lol @ a new necklace. These girls never learn.

After Shock Media 09-15-2009 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bloggerz (Post 16323655)
a $5,000 signing bonus and a new necklace.

Perhaps a pearl necklace :jerkoff

Ok what is industry standard for such services, anyone?

rowan 09-15-2009 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by allanuk (Post 16323730)
It says the agrrement was in Jan 2007, and that she registered her stage name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 2007. So I presume that was after Jan.

So I presume they bought her website before she registered her name.

Question is was she using the same stage name for the previous 5 years?

Qbert 09-15-2009 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan (Post 16324035)
Question is was she using the same stage name for the previous 5 years?

True, as far as trademark is concerned, but the case is ultimately going to hinge on the contract she signed with RK and what it covers or doesn't cover.

idtapdat 09-16-2009 06:11 AM

always something

boneprone 09-16-2009 01:04 PM

i fucked her.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123