![]() |
So here are the two girls Epoch says, "appear fairly young" (pics)
http://digitaldope.com/images/board_...poch_girls.jpg
Both have had kids. Clearly are not underage. Not even close. Odd huh? "Joe" from "Support" needs to get his eyes examined. :2 cents: |
They look legal to me BROmance.
However, as you and I both know that there are plenty of people pushing the envelope, also that 'looking' old enough is not 'proving' old enough. |
errrr. Ummm..
Honestly with them questioning them. even if you have the docs, I would not have posted nude photos here. Just a cya thing |
pics don't load for me, but i'm going to assume they're asian. in which case they all look like they're 14 until they turn like 40...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They are 20 something Latinas. |
Lol if they are asking about them being underage then we are all in trouble.
|
Quote:
|
They don't look too young...
|
Quote:
|
Neither look under 25 to me.
|
maybe "joe" is the father of their babies. just wants to see the little ones again.
|
They look good to me : )
|
Mom ? ?
|
maybe "joe" likes 90 yr olds with no teeth. So those two probably look to young for his tastes
|
did your agreement with epoch say you'd provide IDs when asked?
if so - provide the ids. PERIOD. if not - carry on bitching...... |
I dont think they look "young"
|
Quote:
|
i think an even better question is are they singleing you out or going on a witchhunt
|
they're fucking hot. which site are these girls on?
|
They look over 25 easy...
|
Quote:
|
I would guess early to mid 20's.
How old are they? |
one on the right i could see some justifiable reason to go 'hmm' but that would be it.
|
I also think the one on the right could have a small question mark floating above her, but I presume with a few more pics/angles it would easily be apparent that she's of age... the one on the left is a no brainer
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123