GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How to have google remove/delist your enemies ( tubes etc ) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=931244)

SmokeyTheBear 10-02-2009 11:05 AM

How to have google remove/delist your enemies ( tubes etc )
 
Sponsors should be more proactive about monitoring the se's for content theft, but it can also be a usefull tool for affiliates.

I am NOT suggesting you do this without the copyright holders permission.

An example search on google
playboy full length videos

shows most of the top results are stolen content/copyright abuse

A simple formal complaint to google will return playboy and REAL affiliates to many of the top spots. Multiple complaints and google will remove offending sites ( not just pages ) from the google index entirely.

If you have se rank and the bad guys are scooping your serp , simply contact the sponsor and ask to act on their behalf in sending the dmca complaints.

simple removal template
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sworn Statements
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described below as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Signature

Signed on this date of:



LOCATION OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL (where authorized work is located):

http:// mysite.com/some-page.html

LOCATION OF INFRINGING MATERIAL

http:// badtubesite.com/infringing-page.html

Jdoughs 10-02-2009 11:16 AM

Also, those of you/us with old, trusted google webmaster tools accounts for respected sites in your/our niches. Its been known for a while now that google will infact give these accounts more 'weight' or 'bias' on complaints about copyright and link purchases.

2-3 complaints from old respected sites, (ie hoes, freeones, brandname*) will actually mean something and be looked into much quicker and more in depth then a handful of complaints by random people.

96ukssob 10-02-2009 11:19 AM

Yeah, but its easier for them to just sit back and bitch then do anything about it :2 cents:

seeandsee 10-02-2009 11:21 AM

bump for this

DaddyHalbucks 10-02-2009 12:10 PM

Bump for content producers.

Allison 10-02-2009 01:01 PM

I'm all for this and have attempted to inform other companies of this reseource as well.

Although there are a few lines that I think freak people out:

http://www.google.com/dmca.html

Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is infringing your copyrights. Indeed, in a recent case (please see http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/l...opg_v_diebold/ for more information), a company that sent an infringement notification seeking removal of online materials that were protected by the fair use doctrine was ordered to pay such costs and attorneys fees. The company agreed to pay over $100,000. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether material available online infringes your copyright, we suggest that you first contact an attorney.

PR_Sebas 10-02-2009 01:03 PM

All interesting stuff, it couldn't hurt.

Elixir 10-02-2009 01:45 PM

interesting ideas,...

Nautilus 10-02-2009 01:52 PM

So you need to physically mail them your takedown request?

CyberHustler 10-02-2009 01:52 PM

:thumbsup:thumbsup

Fletch XXX 10-02-2009 02:01 PM

wow lol it just occured to me i read this post already today but not on this forum.... LOL

smokey your post is popular

H-Tom 10-02-2009 02:08 PM

bump ^^^^

Zester 10-02-2009 02:10 PM

this can ban illegal tubes from google

Si 10-02-2009 03:19 PM

Bump for this.

Program owners need to step up and work together to resolve this problem.

JD 10-02-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Si (Post 16384156)
Bump for this.

Program owners need to step up and work together to resolve this problem.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Si 10-02-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD (Post 16384292)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I know,

You get my drift though. probably never happen :2 cents:

SmokeyTheBear 10-02-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus (Post 16383809)
So you need to physically mail them your takedown request?

fax it to google :2 cents:

SmokeyTheBear 10-02-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allison (Post 16383641)
I'm all for this and have attempted to inform other companies of this reseource as well.

Although there are a few lines that I think freak people out:

http://www.google.com/dmca.html

Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is infringing your copyrights. Indeed, in a recent case (please see http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/l...opg_v_diebold/ for more information), a company that sent an infringement notification seeking removal of online materials that were protected by the fair use doctrine was ordered to pay such costs and attorneys fees. The company agreed to pay over $100,000. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether material available online infringes your copyright, we suggest that you first contact an attorney.

form a fake company , let them file the dmca's for you as an authorized copyright enforcement agent, if the shit hits the fan, say they weren't authorized to file dmca's for you.:winkwink::thumbsup

PornMD 10-02-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 16384328)
fax it to google :2 cents:

If I did it I'd at least both fax and mail them a copy if not also email them a copy, then see if I could reach someone on the phone to confirm receipt. But hey, getting someone to spend a nominal amount of time/money to combat the piracy that's killing their revenue/industry...

Doesn't matter to me, I'll keep selling domains while tubes eliminate every last dollar in this industry.

Licentious 10-02-2009 04:02 PM

Probably should note that if you throw stones in a glass house... :winkwink:

SmokeyTheBear 10-02-2009 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licentious (Post 16384383)
Probably should note that if you throw stones in a glass house... :winkwink:

You should only throw stones while in other people's glass houses :winkwink:

Or build the walls from very thick glass.. :2 cents:

Shoehorn! 10-02-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allison (Post 16383641)
I'm all for this and have attempted to inform other companies of this reseource as well.

Although there are a few lines that I think freak people out:

http://www.google.com/dmca.html

Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is infringing your copyrights. Indeed, in a recent case (please see http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/l...opg_v_diebold/ for more information), a company that sent an infringement notification seeking removal of online materials that were protected by the fair use doctrine was ordered to pay such costs and attorneys fees. The company agreed to pay over $100,000. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether material available online infringes your copyright, we suggest that you first contact an attorney.

This doesn't apply to content producers. If you shoot your own content, you own it, and its not fair use. :2 cents:

Denny 10-05-2009 03:37 AM

to the top!!

tranza 10-05-2009 06:55 AM

Bumpty bump

DiF0r 10-05-2009 07:54 AM

I hope this works

borked 10-05-2009 11:03 AM

I'm not sure about google delisting the site... it only recently delisted the homepage of thepiratebay due to DMCA complaints, but not the site :2 cents:

Zester 10-08-2009 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranza (Post 16393139)
Bumpty bump

Bumpty bump bump bump

SleazyDream 10-08-2009 02:38 AM

good idea

CamsMaster 10-08-2009 01:32 PM

bump!/....

Zester 10-16-2009 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamsMaster (Post 16409819)
bump!/....

+1

8 chars

Barefootsies 10-16-2009 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69 (Post 16383165)
Yeah, but its easier for them to just sit back and bitch then do anything about it :2 cents:

True dat.
:thumbsup

CunningStunt 10-16-2009 01:43 PM

Good stuff.

gideongallery 10-16-2009 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 16384348)
form a fake company , let them file the dmca's for you as an authorized copyright enforcement agent, if the shit hits the fan, say they weren't authorized to file dmca's for you.:winkwink::thumbsup

so admit to a criminal act of fraud
to get out of a civil liability

brilliant

gideongallery 10-16-2009 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn! (Post 16384597)
This doesn't apply to content producers. If you shoot your own content, you own it, and its not fair use. :2 cents:

there is no way anyone is that stupid.

fair use is the condition you agree to bound by to get your exclusive rights.

you have to let people make commentaries, parodies, backup recover, timeshift your content. Anyone who bought a right to view has those rights.

Zester 10-23-2009 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zester (Post 16407958)
Bumpty bump bump bump

what he said


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123