GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Any one done live broadcast on the net in HD ? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=931488)

jay23 10-04-2009 08:20 AM

Any one done live broadcast on the net in HD ?
 
What encoder did you use ?

Jay

MaDalton 10-04-2009 08:40 AM

www.flatfeecams.com does that for example and they use windows media

jay23 10-04-2009 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 16389625)
www.flatfeecams.com does that for example and they use windows media

Its actually Flash. The quality is good, not real HD but close.

MaDalton 10-04-2009 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jay23 (Post 16389832)
Its actually Flash. The quality is good, not real HD but close.

well, it used to be windows until a few weeks ago, but i can't check from here since CZ is blocked. at least at that time it was 1280x720 at 1.5 mbit. better than any other cam signal i have seen so far. if you know any better please let me know

jay23 10-04-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 16390250)
well, it used to be windows until a few weeks ago, but i can't check from here since CZ is blocked. at least at that time it was 1280x720 at 1.5 mbit. better than any other cam signal i have seen so far. if you know any better please let me know

I was in Prague last week :-)

Any ways we are working on a HD based system so trying to find out what out their in the market.

Jay

eroticsexxx 10-04-2009 01:31 PM

My company can do it, but each source studio would need symmetrical fiber-optic connectivity (better reliability) and a specific machine set-up that we provide. (Or we can setup the source machine remotely once specification requirements are met)

We also setup the necessary datacenter clusters, based upon the number of your potential customers.

Costs can be pretty high using some of the content delivery companies out there, but we have maximized efficiency for cost.

We (obviously) have seen a significantly reduced demand as of late for such high streaming specs.

The platform that we have used successfully for such high requirements is Windows Media based (rolled out on Windows Server 2003 and 2008).

TheLegacy 10-04-2009 02:27 PM

Talk to the folks at http://www.2much.net

jay23 10-04-2009 03:26 PM

Dont you have a high latency issue on WMV ?




Quote:

Originally Posted by eroticsexxx (Post 16390732)
My company can do it, but each source studio would need symmetrical fiber-optic connectivity (better reliability) and a specific machine set-up that we provide. (Or we can setup the source machine remotely once specification requirements are met)

We also setup the necessary datacenter clusters, based upon the number of your potential customers.

Costs can be pretty high using some of the content delivery companies out there, but we have maximized efficiency for cost.

We (obviously) have seen a significantly reduced demand as of late for such high streaming specs.

The platform that we have used successfully for such high requirements is Windows Media based (rolled out on Windows Server 2003 and 2008).


eroticsexxx 10-04-2009 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jay23 (Post 16391143)
Dont you have a high latency issue on WMV ?

For default configurations that can be an issue, but Windows Media services includes features such as Fast Start and the complete elimination of a buffer time.

There are ways to customize the server configuration that will ensure immediate delivery of video content.

I've noticed that the other solutions offered are all webcam-based services, is that what you are looking for in particular?

jay23 10-04-2009 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eroticsexxx (Post 16391178)
For default configurations that can be an issue, but Windows Media services includes features such as Fast Start and the complete elimination of a buffer time.

There are ways to customize the server configuration that will ensure immediate delivery of video content.

I've noticed that the other solutions offered are all webcam-based services, is that what you are looking for in particular?

I have been working with WMS for all most 8 years and never get to less then 2 sec latency.

Jay

eroticsexxx 10-04-2009 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jay23 (Post 16391604)
I have been working with WMS for all most 8 years and never get to less then 2 sec latency.

Jay

That's significant indeed, but should have been resolved somewhat with WMS9. What kind of configs were you working with?

It isn't impossible to get latency levels below that, but much tweaking will have to be done involving the codecs, you will have to use http streaming (lowest latency through the elimination of rollover from RTSP->MMS-http) and the environmental variables have to be impeccable in regards to your clients.

I'm presently testing out Expression encoder, which has support for true HD content streaming. By the end of this month we should be ready to deploy.

jay23 10-05-2009 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eroticsexxx (Post 16391957)
That's significant indeed, but should have been resolved somewhat with WMS9. What kind of configs were you working with?

It isn't impossible to get latency levels below that, but much tweaking will have to be done involving the codecs, you will have to use http streaming (lowest latency through the elimination of rollover from RTSP->MMS-http) and the environmental variables have to be impeccable in regards to your clients.

I'm presently testing out Expression encoder, which has support for true HD content streaming. By the end of this month we should be ready to deploy.

I am playing with an encoder from Inlet , still no sub 2 sec value. I will keep you posted. My email is jay @ objectcube.com . Since we both seem to be trying to do the same we should keep in touch.

jay


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc