![]() |
photogs- enough with the DOF shots.
it's neat and all that you can manhandle a camera to get that DOF down to <1", but this is porno and a surfer needs&wants the face and pussy in focus.
oh, and get the model to take off her engagement ring/wedding band, not sure why i have to point that out, this is fantasy. besides. she won't be engaged/married for long anyhoo. :thumbsup ty. |
this thread is worthless without pics..
|
Quote:
this shot should have the pussy and face in focus. http://photo.net/general-comments/at...351470/dof.jpg |
|
yes, perfect example, deej. hard to rub one out to that pic!
|
Quote:
|
most glamour shooters like to use 5.6f to create some dof and if you dont zoom too much you are fine but if you use a super long lens.
for "low" light i just use VR technology instead of low f. |
Quote:
http://www.my-starlets.com/penthouse...eid-lez/09.jpg |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
lol. not everyone wants to see cuckhold content eh.
|
Quote:
|
fantasy sells, no doubt...
i have clients where they request the girl/woman must wear a wedding band.. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
obviously, if you make the fantasy of a wife getting fucked porn your bread and butter, the comment doesn't apply- i just didn't realize i had to differentiate. either way, my op still stands, DOF for the sake of clever camera use and having the chick's wedding ring on doesn't appeal to many viewers. |
Quote:
How is the "solo" solo girl/tease thing selling these days compared to the past? I used to make so goddamn much money with Lightspeed selling Tawnee Stone that it was ridiculous. Seems like it has to be that one special girl to really sell that. But I guess that's true no matter what the niche. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc