What sells better in the GF niche...
 

1. Professional content shot by a photographer, high quality touched up images and video, but made to look like it's some selfshot GF type stuff.

2. Actual GF images shot by herself or another non-professional, non-touched up shitty quality images and/or video.*

Reason I ask is that I see paysites playing both of these roles and I'm just wondering if there are more paying customers dumb enough to think the professional content are real GF's and they're just mesmerized by the beautiful touched up images, or are there more paying customers in the GF niche looking for REAL ex-gf content.


*I don't give a fuck about GF sites stealing images from myspace, other sites, etc. that's not the topic.

Self-shot low quality looks real content.

Until they steal your content :2 cents:

This is what I am thinking, I mean it's the obvious answer, BUT if professional content was done just right with the perfect tour and everything I think the nice images would work better.

Even if I had content for people to steal, AND it had been stolen, this isn't the place to bitch about it I'm just trying to get opinions on the subject here. People love to make the same bitching 'content theft' post in all the GF threads and we've all heard it a million times.

it all sells. Content purchasing is an investment that can pay off for a long time.

The self shot is a new niche and probably a fad.

The ex gf stuff is what people use to call Amateur or Home Town.

So the people who bought this stuff 5 years and 10 years that had good quality pics in these niches can still use them :)
I however dont think people will still be able to use self shot in the same manner especially in regards to a legal standpoint.

And as far as surfers dumb?
Remember when "Reality" sites came out?....and people are still shooting them...

lol of course there are plenty of morons surfing for porn, anyone knows that just by viewing search engine keyword traffic, what I'm trying to find out is do the fake pretty GF sites outweigh the ugly real ones in sales?

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Do some tests on a blog with some stuff and see what you get, sexy always sells.

I test my stuff out.
I get certain negative comments about girls and i think they are great. In my tests I am sometimes surprised but the better made and hotter the girl the better it sells. But it has to be for that niche.

Hope that helps!

He's clearly an affiliate so it's not his war to wage... same as myself, so to not to put too fine a point on it...why would we give a flying fuck other than being on a moral high ground? :2 cents:

photoshop crappy amateur photos. Legal problems look serious
 

I have seen sites that take the shitty self-shot photos and put a photoshop expert to work.
Even with basic adjustments, like exposure correction, contrast, white balance and fill light you can vastly improve these photos. Add some blur, airbrush etc and they get pretty good (albeit sometimes too plastic looking)

Now i was always wondering about the legal aspects myself. Not only the missing permit by the model, but what about AGE VERIFICATION? Does it not need only one nude or explixit minor with no id, fake id to bring down a site with his owner?

If someone wants to set up the site owner, looks like a guaranteed success.

It is NOT.

We started HerSelfPics in 2004 and since then there has been many sites that copied the idea.

I doubt it is a fad !

:321GFY

I think you should ask the surfers :)

Our GF sites! :pimp

Check 'em out! :)

Is this Scott if I remember correctly? We have met. Yes I know you started it. I even said to you I thought it was brilliant. However I know you are a good photographer and know the difference between long term photos and something stolen. I hope for you are right but didnt you sell the site the last time I talked to you? like 2 years ago?

Great stuff! already signed up, want to write a review
 

Great stuff. I already signed up for it user starts with 18, sure you can find it.

If you send me a login password I write a review. email in footer.
damn, there is no footer, so sfm-gaf at 18adultreviews dot com

There is something about REAL girls, who do things because they want, in natural ways, who are not sluts, nor bad actesses. I get turned on only by a few of the best of these girls, but that is enough to be worth such a site.

Now still, I am curious about legal implications. Seems you actually have contact with the girls and send a cam. Now these "turn in your girlfriend" sites, are they not risking to get a minor with fake documents, for example? or somone who did not agree to her boyfriend sending the photos out of grudge?

Photoshop improved girlfriend photos
 

your site is an example for the photoshop improved girlfriend photos.

I presume they are original girlfriendphotos, and they are definitely photoshopped, almost too obviously.

Much better looking then the normal unedited stuff that is not even exposure corrected. Hell, even pro photographer need to do some exposure adjustments.

I did some improvement on a really crappy girlfriend photo in a review http://18adultreviews.com/photo-vide...iends-blowjobs

Unfortunately I don't have the original for comparison, but it was CRAPPY.
I wonder why most reality webmasters don't even bother to improve the photos. Even automatic adjustment in photoshop CS.. or lightroom might do. Or pay an Indian guy a pittance to do it for you

what is Reality?
 

For me, these girlfriend sites are "Reality"

Now from what I understand, the term "Reality" has been used by people who do "unreal" "fake Reality" shoots with paid models who pretend being picked up right off the street and other fake scenes.

Can anyone enlighten me on terminology?

i agree, but that burns fast