WEG sued by Redtube
 

http://www.xbiz.com/news/114322

wow just wow

sorry if this was posted already

Wow, good luck..

Funny ;)

nice... can I be the first to say they are both thieves?

no :2 cents:

i find it funny that red tube one of the biggest content thieves on the net is suing weg for theft of trade secrets

:1orglaugh

everyone got that email.

good luck

big cocks white socks

craziness

Check out this one, http://www.xbiz.com/news/112457

i'm confused... how does 7.5 million visitors a day with maybe 7 sales equal 6 million dollars in compensation?

maybe some tube owners could step up and explain this anomaly?

You didn't know... only the TubeBros are on the special secret need-to-know $850,000 PPS program... :warning

Twenty ?John Doe? defendants are named in the complaint.

http://www.russianballer.com/wp-cont...rikol_0831.jpg

All tubes must die. Love and kisses.

so WEG and teen revenue are chums eh? well thats interesting

It's the same anomaly that dictates advertising prices. :1orglaugh

PS: Sorry, have to take some 'pot shots' at this. :winkwink:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

funny fuckers

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes it's funny news, or better say paradox

"You sue me, I sue you"

For some reason I don't think we'll see any winners here, except the lawyers on their way to the bank.

The site makes hundreds of sales daily. Maybe even more.

:2 cents:

lol.....

If you think a really big tube like that only makes 7 sales a day you are dreaming.

this would be really funny, not only are they winning the teen revenue lawsuit but all of the court cost could end up being paid by another porn company.

That is standard, even if you know names you would always add John Does. :2 cents:

what does this mean? how can either side be *winning*?

I am no lawyer but I think Weg will get away with the domain names and here's my reason:

If a drug dealer gets his drugs stolen he can't go to court and sue someone over it.

(if illegal activity is being done, there's no basis for law on top of it)

Redtube has illegal content, they are basically pirates.
Wegcash was being seo pirates and tried to skim some of their traffic from the engines.

So if wegcash's lawyers can bring up the actual legal precedent, the judge will throw this out.

Kodos to WEGCASH.

What legal precedent would that be?

Nobody 8chr

I believe this is called irony?

cybersquatting panelists do not have to determine if the site being squatted on is legit or not

redtube supposedly bought and inserted licensed content some time ago too

three words "Safe harbor provision"

just because the morons here call it an "illegal" tube site doesn't make it illegal

is that what you call irony ?:Oh crap

ps sorry Les, didnt scroll that far down ;)

so.. is it illegal to buy NAME.otherextension?

WEG tried to sue me over some bullshit so I'm really getting a kick out of all of this.

which leaves the question, if WEG would have went through with deal to "buy" Redtube, would *they* then be considered "biggest content theieves on the net?"

LOL curious

kudos to being wrong on every point.

a thief cries...: "catch the thief!" ? :pimp

where you getting this 7 sales a day from? just because you don't understand something does not make it less true. like even though you daddy is making mommy scream he isn't killing her.

oh the irony