TeenRevenue, Question : Why are some of the PPS sales we send put under revshare?
 

We sent you guys 5 sales yesterday, but 2 of them are put under revshare - even though all five were sent through the same PPS linkcode?

I had the same problem just wrote them mail, waiting for responce, it might be some glitch?

this one is officially bumped

:1orglaugh

I was getting cents for some sales instead of the $35 pps and Tampa Toker gave me this answer on ICQ:
"Hey found out what deal is with .51 cent sales they are revshare trials. This only happens when when transactions is decliened by first processor and goes to ccbill our next cascade. If the sale converts to full you get credited 60% revshare and rebills on that user"

is this your case too?

This is correct :)

That is brilliant.

So they get the high traffic guys pushing HARD for PPS, they flip the cascade around when they want and only give them revshare, which the high traffic guys would NEVER have opted for in the first place had they known they were going to get stuck with it.

Pretty slick. What a way to fuck over a lot of webmasters who are only sending you traffic because they want PPS.

Tampa Toker, I hope you are getting paid well by the new owners because your rep is going to be mud soon. Call it a hunch.

Actually if i thought my rep was gonna get mudded i would of been out of dodge long ago. As for getting paid well there is always room for improvement. But to be fair we aint never flipped the switch to do what you just posted. If that's the case i would of been long gone :2 cents:

I was also curious about this.. but if what they say is true and the sale was rejected from their main processor its better to get revshare than nothing at all.. but its still considered a sale with the 2nd processor so why not pay pps on that one?

Yea this is a great concept. Wish I had thought of this

You have a great rep now. Then I hear who may have bought the company and I know of some of the shit they do, so when anything shady comes up, you have to think the worst.

To me, this is SUPER SHADY. You run NATS, it will count the PPS with the cascade. There is no logical reason to do it the other way and reduce it to revshare on the cascade. That's just crooked. Brilliant, but crooked.

Having said that, I don't promote you guys so I'm not going to break balls over it. Just giving you a POV and something for you to keep your eyes open for.

might have to change your name to honest tampa soon.

Thanks man appreciate the kind words. That's the problem everyone hears who bought this and that. Which is fine by me but some of the stuff i see posted is comical thu. But the truth this no one knows who bought Teenrev. Honestly i don't care who the owner is.

As Long as the affiliates get taken care of and i receive my pay for doing my job i have no issues :2 cents: You aint breaking my balls man it comes with the territory here on gfy :winkwink:

Trust me, these guys want the transactions to go through the primary processor, who they make the most per member with. The alternative to having CC Bill has a lower income secondary is to have nothing at all, and thus make no sales.

What processor declines what CCBill picks up?

if you mean whats their first processor the anwswer is EPGBill why

because the processor is CCBill? I dont have it clear either, thats a good point, maybe Tampa can say something about it

dont worry tampatoker will be here to clear it all up!!!

Some people are going to bitch no matter what.