Your GFY Blacklist of Scammers Is Coming.
 

I'll put together the blacklist f you guys want to email me the following info to wm>tube2k>com


Name
AKA names, usernames, all that shit
ICQ and any other info
What you were ripped off for
How much
what method.

any other proof that your claim is real.


I'll get the list up as soon as you guys send me the info ;) Figured I will contribute to the GFY community.

You willing to accept the legal repercussions?

Excuse my apparent lack of informational knowledge, but how exactly would there be legal repercussions from a blacklist of thieves, frauds, and scammers?

That will be a very long list.

Cancel that idea then. I may be dumb sometimes but I ain't no idiot. Thanks you two.

How would a scammer ever have money to bring a libel suit?

If they had more than a few dollars wouldn't they be doing bigger and better things than scamming $50 to a couple hundred dollars here and there?

I don't know, but I don't need any kind of legal problems. Fuck that. Period.

But then again, the libel suits could really apply to any post, thread, or topic related to one specific person scamming someone. Did you think about that?

This would be drama.

It's not happening, StaceyJo. Some bitch would whine about being exposed. I am happy being legal-problem free, and I will keep it that way.

tube2k is too retarded to have figured out the repercussions on his own, you guys should have just let him do it

Go fuck yourself, area51.

http://www.w3bbo.com/forums/You-Are-Fucking_Retard.gifOh, look, here come the trolls. Why dont you guys run a train on each other in your little playhouse.

dont hate on the guy for at least trying to make a contribution to stop all the scum.

You are a judge? How do you know who is right and wrong? Last month I have seen enough issues where I can't decide who is right or wrong.

What would be site ripoffreport.com then.

Please read a little further into the thread before jumping to a conclusion.

just when you thought you've seen it all

I'm a shoplifter not a scammer...

The reality is that nobody would get sued. If there were more lawsuits, there would be less scammers. Everyone says they are going to file suit but most never do. Few even seem interested in protecting their copyrights.

hm...a commendable idea but that's not something you can decide so quickly, is it? I mean there are famous scammers around and they should be made public but there are others I'm having a hard time deciding whether they're wrong.

I hope I never end up on such a list. :)

Yes, and how many times has that site been sued?

This calls for a Webmaster Union.
From there it should be more easier to eliminate the little bastards

Well yes but it seems they kind a abusing this idea:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-anato...report-lawsuit

As well as the other kind of bullshit that comes from these types of people.

DDoS attack to your site(s)
Joe Jobs against you and your site(s)
Malicious false report(s) against your account(s)

....among other things?

Noble concept champ. I applaud your efforts.

That said, without iron clad proof, and in this sue happy online/real world. I would make sure I had my ducks in a row before naming companies and branding them one thing or another. Some of them, especially BROgrams, are not going to like it nor will sit back and take it.... resulting in that they will probably sue you into silence.

I have done it before. Past three years went to court 9 times, came out on top all but one, cost me 500, but if you dont have a brother who is a lawyer will cost you a lot to defend your self.
It can be done, but has to be real proof and right wording

Truth is in libel and slander :2 cents:

So true :2 cents:

It was until a few days ago that I really understood the true effect of libel. It's a word often tossed around here. I was reading some thread about some supposed scammer, and thought to myself "this thread will probably make me automatically not trust this person if they hit me up to do business" despite that there is obviously two sides to the story. I didn't know either party in this case, thus had no bias but based on even a random unknown persons statements, it can effect my decision to do business with someone just because its at the back of my head. So that being said, talking smack about someone IS libel if you don't have any proof.

Yeah I know the truth is in that, and it's a bitch and many people can't handle the truth, but I refuse to risk what little I have over childish bitches who want to cry for the wrongs they've done. That's why I said I am cancelling my idea, and leaving it at that. Just an idea. Hell... I haven't made a penny selling shit porn yet so I'm not wasting my time on anything extra.

98% of the people here or in life in general have never or never will sue anyone.

I'd publish that list BUT do it with proof. If you back it up and can slam dunk them, there is not much someone can do about it. Otherwise, every pill pushing company or corporation that has a product that doesn't work, and word leaks that it doesn't work, those companies would be suing everyone. Why don't they? Because they know it's true and someone usually comes to bat with proof of this.

Make a fake nic, use a proxy to log-on and out them. Fuck scammers.

They would have to prove actual damages were done. So the chances of that are very low.

Good that you canceled it. I appreciate your willingness to contribute but it would be a childish idea.

Fuck the drama. I want no part of it and would rather sit here and pick my ass than deal with some stupid shit.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I guess you haven't been around long. :2 cents:

A total scam.

Your departure can't be too soon.

wtf man? you like to sue just for shits and giggles, or just attract scammers for some reason? :helpme

So you can get someone on libel for stating an opinion?

Ok lets say I start a website and state "These are companies and/or persons we would not personally do business with or associate ourselves with. The decision to do business or associate yourself with the companies and/or persons listed is completely up to you. We are only providing our personal opinion and the information on to why we will not do business with said companies and/or persons." Then we list the companies and/or persons with information on why we would not do business with said companies and/or persons. This would be considered libel?

Gary

PLUS - If it's true, and they take you to court, you can show your side and their libel claims aren't libel.

And as FreeHugeMovies said, they'd have to prove damages.

Tehnicly someone who would start such a site would need either do it under total anonymity or live in non europe/usa country.

it's all great, until you fuck with the wrong person/company... they sue you, and all of a sudden, you have to spend $1000s to defend yourself... :2 cents:

in law, it's often not who is right, but who has deeper pockets :2 cents:

freeforum.tw and lets see the lawsuits