GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Webcams and Brazzers sold to Virage Media for 140m (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=958279)

xxxjay 03-13-2010 10:58 PM

Webcams and Brazzers sold to Virage Media for 140m
 
Or that is what I hear...

epitome 03-13-2010 11:02 PM

http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/958211-brazzzers-sold.html

I guess its running rampant now.

EscortBiz 03-13-2010 11:04 PM

bob rice if hes out there scanning let us know if its true

xxxjay 03-13-2010 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 16944637)

Yeah, that thread is lame, it doesn't name the buyer, the price, or webcams.com

I win.

xxxjay 03-13-2010 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EscortBiz (Post 16944638)
bob rice if hes out there scanning let us know if its true

As I understand it, Virage owns the whole kit and kaboodle Mansef wise tubes, dating, porn...the whole 9.

Iron Fist 03-13-2010 11:11 PM

I need to start my own thread about Brazzers being sold too

Mutt 03-13-2010 11:17 PM

if this turns out to be true it doesn't mean the US government's or TopBuck's lawsuits are going away. not sure how the TopBucks lawsuit would affect a new owner, the lawsuit is against the parent company.

i'd rather have webcams.com than Brazzers, too much legal liability with the tube sites and Brazzers paysite operation is expensive and so dependent on spending that same money and keeping a production staff in place that maintains the quality. we've seen major paysite programs who have lost their mojo for various reasons. webcams.com is more predictable.

better get that money in cash - look at Lars, Penthouse paid 500 million for AFF/Cams and it's almost all still owing to them without Penthouse having a way to pay it.

xxxjay 03-13-2010 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead (Post 16944650)
I need to start my own thread about Brazzers being sold too

Get some facts then.

xxxjay 03-13-2010 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 16944657)
if this turns out to be true it doesn't mean the US government's or TopBuck's lawsuits are going away. not sure how the TopBucks lawsuit would affect a new owner, the lawsuit is against the parent company.

I'm no lawyer but I believe the liability is transferred.

Monique Niccole 03-13-2010 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 16944657)
if this turns out to be true it doesn't mean the US government's or TopBuck's lawsuits are going away. not sure how the TopBucks lawsuit would affect a new owner, the lawsuit is against the parent company.

Well, did they buy the company or the assets of the company? If they bought the assets of the company (websites, domains, etc) and the lawsuit is against the company that holds those assets, then it seems to me that the lawsuit would not affect the new owners.

But I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on GFY.

epitome 03-13-2010 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 16944640)
Yeah, that thread is lame, it doesn't name the buyer, the price, or webcams.com

I win.

You saw Brazzers and raised them Webcams.

I see your Brazzers and Webcams and raise you AFF with a purchase price of $223 million! :)

epitome 03-13-2010 11:56 PM

So what's all of this liability not being transferred?

Part of any acquisition is due diligence including sniffing out existing and even potential lawsuits so that you do not end up assuming unknown liabilities.

Perhaps things have changed or I'm not as versed in International acquisitions as I had hoped.

magpan 03-14-2010 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 16944696)
So what's all of this liability not being transferred?

Part of any acquisition is due diligence including sniffing out existing and even potential lawsuits so that you do not end up assuming unknown liabilities.

Perhaps things have changed or I'm not as versed in International acquisitions as I had hoped.

It was either a due diligence gaffe or they know more about what's going on, on the legal end, than we do and the move is tactical. The latter is likely the case but you never know. :thumbsup

EvilHearts 03-14-2010 12:07 AM

They got some major bank!

epitome 03-14-2010 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magpan (Post 16944702)
It was either a due diligence gaffe or they know more about what's going on, on the legal end, than we do and the move is tactical. The latter is likely the case but you never know. :thumbsup

Nothing stopping them from saying "$13 or so million in outstanding potential liability, we'll reduce the purchase price by X"

I just don't get how everybody thinks how if you sell your company everything bad suddenly goes away for both the seller and the buyer.

Nicky 03-14-2010 12:13 AM

So will this influence me doing biz with webcams.com?

JD 03-14-2010 01:20 AM

bling bling...

Bman 03-14-2010 01:23 AM

Lawsuits are a liability on the books... ie net worth minus liabilites and are calculated into the worth of a company. Lawsuits in business are a just that Business. Check At&T or any major corporation and see how many lawsuits they have against them and they are always listed as liabilities or potential loses on the books.

This aint a criminal suit its a business civil suit.

It would have been figured into to the sale of the company. A check might have been written to Pink Visual and the US Gov that same day. It might have been part of the settlement who knows.
I am sure in the next little while you will hear.

But it does tell you one thing that there is still a lot of money in this business and that there is a strong belief that there will continue to be...:2 cents:

darksoul 03-14-2010 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky (Post 16944717)
So will this influence me doing biz with webcams.com?


so far its just a rumour.

ladida 03-14-2010 04:58 AM

Closest to truth so far. Little more then 140 for both it went.

BIGTYMER 03-14-2010 05:04 AM

They stole all your porns and made millions. Congrats!

Jack Sparrow 03-14-2010 05:34 AM

Webcams.com was sold over a month ago ;)

PR_Dave 03-14-2010 06:34 AM

Congrats if they really sold.

seeandsee 03-14-2010 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EvilHearts (Post 16944704)
They got some major bank!

:2 cents::2 cents:

Dappz 03-14-2010 07:18 AM

um that was cool ;;;;;;;;

JFK 03-14-2010 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 16944991)
Closest to truth so far. Little more then 140 for both it went.

so whats not correct about it ?

magpan 03-14-2010 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 16944711)
I just don't get how everybody thinks how if you sell your company everything bad suddenly goes away for both the seller and the buyer.

I can answer that one: naivety. It comes from using the internet for nothing more than 'fapping one off' to a 3 minute clip on a tube site or trolling GFY. lol :upsidedow

RAM 03-14-2010 08:09 AM

Now that is some MONEY !!!

RayBonga 03-14-2010 08:36 AM

there is no money in porn / tubes. this must be a lie.

ladida 03-14-2010 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 16945181)
so whats not correct about it ?

The figure. It's more, but he's close. And webcams did sell before brazzers.
But that other thread is funny :)

clicker 03-14-2010 09:03 AM

For Sale

slapass 03-14-2010 10:14 AM

How long have they been around as that is a serious internet success story. 140 mil in about 3 years?

tehHinjew 03-14-2010 10:39 AM

isnt there ftc rumors going around?

triumph 03-14-2010 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Dave (Post 16945088)
Congrats if they really sold.

did this sale cross your desk? I remember you posting https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=16927601&postcount=16

brassmonkey 03-14-2010 11:09 AM

they didnt sale

Naechy 03-14-2010 11:27 AM

i don`t know really

PR_Dave 03-15-2010 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triumph (Post 16945474)
did this sale cross your desk? I remember you posting https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=16927601&postcount=16

No which is very strange.

Imortyl Pussycat 03-15-2010 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monique Niccole (Post 16944680)

But I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on GFY.

that made me laugh so hard i almost pee'd a little :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Kevsh 03-15-2010 04:35 PM

I hope the new owners of Webcams.com do something about improving it, it's been a missed opportunity for a long time.

JC Maldini 03-15-2010 04:37 PM

this could get interesting :)

Forest 03-15-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 16944657)

better get that money in cash - look at Lars, Penthouse paid 500 million for AFF/Cams and it's almost all still owing to them without Penthouse having a way to pay it.

is that called Karma?

:winkwink:

datatank 03-15-2010 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_dave (Post 16948679)
no which is very strange.

lol.....

pocketkangaroo 03-15-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevsh (Post 16948804)
I hope the new owners of Webcams.com do something about improving it, it's been a missed opportunity for a long time.

I hope conversions get better. They used to rock and then all of a sudden one month fell off the face of the Earth and have not gotten back on track.

kristin 03-15-2010 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 16944669)
I'm no lawyer but I believe the liability is transferred.

You would be correct.

Brujah 07-15-2010 11:24 PM

big blingin

Chosen 07-16-2010 01:02 AM

Old news...

JustDaveXxx 07-16-2010 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 16944669)
I'm no lawyer but I believe the liability is transferred.

I dont think its so much an issue of avoiding liability as much as it is a strategic move to remove all assets from Mansef and put it all into an overseas corporation that the US cant touch and would have no jurisdiction over.


I dont think its so much the Pink Visual lawsuit that made Masef liquidate and move, as it is the slew of lawsuits that will follow if Pink Visual, wins. Further more, the way things are going with copyright infringements running rampant and change towards holding copyright infringers acountable seems to be inevitable.



This is what may happen; If Pink Visual, wins Mansef will have a very sizable judgment against it. Thus forcing Mansef to file bankruptcy. A Bankruptcy court will see what assets are available to liquidate, In order to pay off this judgment. There will be no assets and no money from the sale proceeds in any US jurisdiction. So asset or money confiscation wont be likely.


Also Keep in mind the 9 million that the US seized from Brazers earlier this year can be seen as an asset that Mansef may still have after everything has been liquidated. This the court system may seize as an awardable judgement if Pink Visual wins. And that is only if Mansef can prove that the 9 million was wrongfully seized. Lots of "ifs" with that one.


Either way, if Pink Visual wins or looses this is a very good business move for Brazzers. This will close up all future liabilities and possible future asset seizures.




I hate to say it, but this is a genius business move on many different levels. What would make this move even better, would be to incorporate every single asset as its own company. Then have a few different "holding corporations" in different countries that maintain strict corporate veils. What this would accomplish, is complete business anonymity and the ability to move assets from corporation to corporation. If one company gets sued, move the assets and Bankrupt it. Nobody would see shit, and nobody would be able to touch shit, because of the lack of reach from one country to another.



The only thing that kind of baffles me is why didn't they do this way earlier? This is "International Business "101 and 1st semester "Corporations" stuff. We all know they have the money.:2 cents:

xxxjay 07-16-2010 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustDaveXxx (Post 17339589)
I dont think its so much an issue of avoiding liability as much as it is a strategic move to remove all assets from Mansef and put it all into an overseas corporation that the US cant touch and would have no jurisdiction over.


I dont think its so much the Pink Visual lawsuit that made Masef liquidate and move, as it is the slew of lawsuits that will follow if Pink Visual, wins. Further more, the way things are going with copyright infringements running rampant and change towards holding copyright infringers acountable seems to be inevitable.



This is what may happen; If Pink Visual, wins Mansef will have a very sizable judgment against it. Thus forcing Mansef to file bankruptcy. A Bankruptcy court will see what assets are available to liquidate, In order to pay off this judgment. There will be no assets and no money from the sale proceeds in any US jurisdiction. So asset or money confiscation wont be likely.


Also Keep in mind the 9 million that the US seized from Brazers earlier this year can be seen as an asset that Mansef may still have after everything has been liquidated. This the court system may seize as an awardable judgement if Pink Visual wins. And that is only if Mansef can prove that the 9 million was wrongfully seized. Lots of "ifs" with that one.


Either way, if Pink Visual wins or looses this is a very good business move for Brazzers. This will close up all future liabilities and possible future asset seizures.




I hate to say it, but this is a genius business move on many different levels. What would make this move even better, would be to incorporate every single asset as its own company. Then have a few different "holding corporations" in different countries that maintain strict corporate veils. What this would accomplish, is complete business anonymity and the ability to move assets from corporation to corporation. If one company gets sued, move the assets and Bankrupt it. Nobody would see shit, and nobody would be able to touch shit, because of the lack of reach from one country to another.



The only thing that kind of baffles me is why didn't they do this way earlier? This is "International Business "101 and 1st semester "Corporations" stuff. We all know they have the money.:2 cents:

That youtube vs Viacom doesn't make it look hopeful though.

GonZo 07-16-2010 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 16944657)
if this turns out to be true it doesn't mean the US government's or TopBuck's lawsuits are going away. not sure how the TopBucks lawsuit would affect a new owner, the lawsuit is against the parent company.

i'd rather have webcams.com than Brazzers, too much legal liability with the tube sites and Brazzers paysite operation is expensive and so dependent on spending that same money and keeping a production staff in place that maintains the quality. we've seen major paysite programs who have lost their mojo for various reasons. webcams.com is more predictable.

better get that money in cash - look at Lars, Penthouse paid 500 million for AFF/Cams and it's almost all still owing to them without Penthouse having a way to pay it.

Funny the recurring names in all of this....
Topbucks who sold Yappo to the same company that owned Xtube who in turn bought Brazzers.

Reminds me of Serges picture of 3 squirrels.

JustDaveXxx 07-16-2010 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 17340858)
That youtube vs Viacom doesn't make it look hopeful though.

I dont think its just one issue making this happen. Im thinking it is a combination of a lot of issues. And a move like this would definitely prevent a bunch of possible future issues.



***This is all theory and speculation, assuming that the Brazzers purchase is in fact a movement of company assets into a shell corp.***



At the end of the day, I, and everyone here truly does not know what the real deal is.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123