![]() |
Does today's porn really suck?
I've loved porn since the first time I saw it. I used to rent it on VHS tapes. I was a regular at the porn shops in town. It was like a hobby. Especially on days I couldn't get laid! Back then the porn from the 80's and maybe into the early 90's kicked ass. Something you don't see as much off.... the chick's smiling. The women don't seem to smile like they used to. They looked like they were into it. These chicks just look like they want the dough so they can get their next fix.
Not only that. But, there was that little shot right before the cumshot. The shot of the guy in what looked like pure pleasure. You saw that and then you saw the jizz fly. No matter if it was real or fake, it sure did make the movie more fun to watch. You don't even see the guy's face in a lot of porn today. Women that don't smile and guys that don't show their faces. To top it all off, there's no good music. There was only one place to hear that music. After a few drinks or whatever that music starts to sound good. No music, sad chicks, and no face shot before the money shot. While I might not be the most sober among us today. I do believe I'm kind of heartbroken over the quality of porn that I see. Which begs me to ask.... What sponsor is selling the good porn to the customer? Don't tell me you didn't laugh at least one time when when Ron Jeremy made those faces right before the cumshot. That was classic film. If I had a cigar and a glass with a couple fingers of good booze in it I would feel like an old man talking about this. |
I flip through a lot of porn and my #1 complaint is seeing the guys face or hearing his stupid little jokes when I'm trying to watch an ass bounce up and down.
I think it's kind of weird that you are disappointed you don't see the guys face right before the pop. LOL. |
Also that one movie with Ron Jeremy in it. I don't remember what it was called. I seem to remember a chick that was lactating. After Ron Jeremy shot his load he started to talk like the guy from The Godfather. Someone other than me has had to see that one? They used to be kind of crazy like that. Or that one where Peter North dresses up like a super hero?
Maybe the talent sucks today. |
Facial expressions are way underrated, and if they appear, often too fake
Focus lies completely on penetration these days which is a shame cause having good sex is so much more than that, even to watch |
Quote:
|
It's not as good as it used to be.
|
Quote:
I simply do not watch porn that has a guy in it any more based on the old flicks where you would get the dude and his remarks, his face, some shithead off cam being 'the coach' and so on. :disgust |
Quote:
I always thought the idea of watching porn was to have fun. Those jokes were to be part of the experience. Part of the fun. After all, you can't take a movie too serious that was made for you to jerk off too. We aren't talking Gone with the Wind here. We wanted to see people having fun and guys living out that fantasy. That's what it was all about. The fantasy. Now, even if it were fantasy you wouldn't see nothing. Just a cock and a chick that seems to have forgotten to smile. Maybe the guy could have the unsigned check taped to his pubes to remind her to smile from time to time. |
Quote:
I still haven't found a porn star that compares to Loni Sanders. She had the ultimate "fuck me" face. :2 cents: |
Quote:
I know from a fetish stand point, the porn is DEAD THE FUCK ON for catering to the shots and needs of the fetish folk. We do not get the crumbs and shit that Vivid and some of the old school porn companies tried to pass off as fetish porn. A foot flying in the air, a 2 second toe lick, and lingering shot of her shoe while being fucked, etc.. Those were all classics back in the day and box covers would be marketed, and rip off, people looking for micro niches. Now the porn is more tailored to those of us who want more specific things. Not ALL of the videos, even foot videos, hit the spot for me. But there is a lot better material now then there was even back mid 90's. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They do not need HD, nor perfect lighting, or the hottest women on the planet to rub one out. They need scenes that focus on their fetish at the right angles and duration. Girls doing the right thing in the scene and looking like, or being into it. How do I know? Because patrons write me. I also seek out their boards and read their comments. Not one time have I ever seen them talk about HD, nor say it would be better in HD. They talk about the angles, and if the girls is into it, the length of the scene among other things. It sounds to me like you are one of these believers who thing all porn must be professional shot in the best lighting, HD, mega screen res., and the hottest women on the planet. That is 100% wrong. Especially in the fetish markets. It simply reinforces how little mainstream guys know about niche. :2 cents: |
Quote:
I think the shot of the guy right before the cumshot is fantastic. Especially if we're talking facials or cum on tits. It gives the chick a chance to smile. I want to see a chick smile and be happy that cum is going to land on her. I want her to be as excited to watch him shoot semen on her face as I am. No matter even if it makes her sick. I want to see a woman enjoying some semen. |
Quote:
Right! Mass distribution, creates mass production which creates a formula to optimize cost of production, which creates a a generic product in any business. |
Also what the fuck is up with the couches? I'm so sick of seeing people fuck on couches. Everything is done from a couch. Buy a bed. If they have to use couches get some custom upholstery done so it doesn't look like total shit. Like someone took the couch out of their parent's house long enough to shoot a porn video. Spend some money to make the place look half way decent. All you really need to do is know a queer that likes to go to the thrift shops :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
A few sites and companies have bucked this trend and their numbers are holding, because the others just don't meet customers expectations over and over again. |
You are just nostalgic. What you describe is what sucks on porn movies the most. The fact that there is less stupid music and no stupid guy faces, makes porn more quality, actually. I didn't realize girls weren't smiling during porn nowadays, I don't think many women smile during having sex in real life either.
Its like telling: "I miss the old times when all people were like happy teddybears, smiling all the time, holding hands and helping each other." Those times never were, but people mostly remember only the good things from the past, so they have an illusion of things beeing better back in the day. When the fact is, that people didn't really change. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, the Where's the Beef old lady was funny. It was fun trying to see if there was an end to Pitfall. And yes, porn was fantasy and not reality. I don't know how often a woman smiles. You see, reality sucks. That's why we watch entertainment. I don't care what a woman does in reality. It must have been the Pepsi Throwback. That's what threw my mind out of whack. Who knew real sugar tasted so good?! |
I would say that just like the "old days"...some porn is really good and some is just average.
And just like the "old days" it all comes down to what you are watching. Back in the early 1980's I went to my first adult bookstore in Ft. Lauderdale, Fl and went on a buying spree. I ended up with a dozen or so videos that I thought would be good judging by the box cover. Nope. They all were boring. I finally put together a "gonzo" tape (which is what a LOT of folks used to do) which was basically taking out all the filler crap and going straight to the fucking. I ended up with a 2 hour tape that kicked ass! Now THAT was a tape a guy could jerk off to everytime. Fast forward to now: Yes, if you watch the generic porn being put out by the bigger companies it does all start to look the same. They can't help it. When you have one in-house "director" having to come up with 4 or 5 scenarios a day using the same dozen porn valley girls and guys over and over and over...well, the creativity is hard to keep at a quality level. How many times can you put Puma Swede in glasses and call her a "granny" and then turn around and put her in pigtails and call her a "teen"? (actually that sounds like something I'd like to do in private with her...lol) But there are lots of people out here shooting good porn that caters to the EXACT needs and wants of the people. If you like skinny teen girls getting fucked by big black cock...I will guarantee you that there is a porn site right now doing a better job of that than ANY company from the past ever did. Same with every niche. You just have to find them and stop generalizing the entire industry by what that little self-absorbed place called "Porn Valley" does. Porn Valley is NOT the industry anymore. It's not even close. It's just where they still put out DVD's that nobody buys, nothing more. |
Quote:
|
give me hot babe i dont look for big cocks
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Today's porn is too generic. Pornographers have lost touch with what people really want. Sometimes the porn sucks so much, I am already starting to think this is a big conspiracy of the porn producers to make their porn look bad so that they can sell more of it...
|
Quote:
|
yeah man bring back the good old 70s -80s porn with all those hairy pussys and real boobs
Way to much fake crap around now |
You mentioned music... You're spot on. Nothing beats 70s porn funk music. Lots of wa wa effects and funky base lines. There's even CD collections that came out in the 90s that featured anthologies of 70s German porn background music.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I just don't know ...
|
Quote:
agreed!!:thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just like in music and art...being a big studio doesn't neccessarily mean that you have a superior product. And every year somebody, somewhere will come along and build on the past to make a better product today. Today we can light up a set far better than they used to with a LOT less heat in the room. We can shoot and edit with one handheld prosumer cam that costs 5 grand and get better quality than guys using a couple of quarter million dollar cams could. The only thing that made porn of yesterday AND of today suck was when it's shot by a big company that hires a guy to shoot scenes for a dozen different niches. It's impossible to have creativity and real quality like that. So they hire a guy who can churn out a consistently "good" scene for them. No more, no less. Just like the "old days". |
Quote:
|
Right in the old days all money shots would be preceeded by an endless clip of the male talent's face - how horrible and gay was that? Total scene killer. When the public started getting what is wanted, all that went away.
|
I like retro better sometimes, new shit other times, depends on the niche
|
It's not as good as it used to be. [2]
|
it could be better, good old pornstars are getting fat and there aren't a lot of new babes that fit in the pornstar category.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123