![]() |
Should Barefootsies follow the same rules everyone else does?
He called BigDeanEvans a scammer basically, by saying he was Batts new nickname. Should he be exempt from the same rules he's used against other people, or should he be guilty and banned for not posting proof of his accusations?
|
Haven't seem somebody hated this much in a long time.
|
|
Ban the fucking spammer!
|
Quote:
|
If someone calls another webmaster a scammer, he must show proof of it, or follow the same path as those who break the rules. No matter if it's the new clown of GFY, a charismatic guy or a hater. If someone HIJACKS other webmasters Threads to SPAM his shit, he's full of shit. Nobody is going to buy from a desperate seller anyways.
Easy as that. BTW, any webmaster that WASTES a lot of time on forums, will get in trouble soon or late. Rule of thumb. . |
Quote:
|
The rules of gfy, whether applied harshly or lightly, should be applied equally to all GFY members. As long as the process is the same for everyone, there is no discrimination.
|
http://www.twodifferentshoes.com/wp-...5/jellyous.png
Hate all you want if you could press a button and have the exposure you would too. Learn, don't hate. Beat him at his own game, crying foul never wins. |
its truly unbelievable. His haters post about him as much as he does. Ironic how they unwittingly do his bidding. :1orglaugh
|
|
true dat hoss see sig chief toe sig top sig tee hee sig
|
Quote:
|
who cares man,
this shit is getting too old |
Sigspot and stuff.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you know Fatfoo is only 2 letters away from Fastfood? |
Quote:
"let BigDeanEvans proove he is not Batts." how ridiculous does that sound? now you can go start threads accusing everyone being scammers the you don't have to prove anything! now THEY have to prove they aren't scammers! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He spams like crazy:disgust
|
Quote:
The rules should apply equally to everyone. :2 cents: |
Quote:
hahaha nice. Thats how the cops do it too! |
|
no comment
|
Quote:
If Eric banned me, he would also have to ban the vast majority of the people who keep this issue going. All of them are breaking one of two rules and have been for two day now. They have made REAL accusations (not some vague subject header) against me. and/or my business over this week without posting any proof. Others have made between a half dozen of these threads with excessive harassment, and inciting others. Also against the rules. So in reality, you can't have it both ways. ALL would have to be banned. |
Quote:
Under your logic, if I posted Argos88 in the subject header, and a picture of the Klan in the post. I am saying you are in the Klan by picture association. Even if I say nothing else in the thread. If you post a remark in some thread, and I post a picture of a woman being bitch slapped. You can claim I am saying you are a woman, or a wife beater by the picture alone. That is really what you are trying to say with these claims. Which is ridiculous. No one was called a scammer no matter how many times you want to repeat it, make threads about it, or say that something is 'inferred' by some picture in a thread, or how YOU interpret it. :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
I vote ban :thumbsup
|
Quote:
I don't buy your argument that people should just use the Ignore button. If that was the case then the Banhammer/moderating shouldn't exist in the first place. You have gotten a few of your opponents banned on technicalities (breaking GFY rules). It means you accept and play by the rules of the game. Now, when you have broken one of the same rules (not posting proof) in a fair world you should also be banned then. Barefootsies, why is the moderator giving you special privileges which the rest of the rule-abiding posters don't have? Are you personal friends or something like that? Can you elaborate on this? Is this some hidden unspoken "Bro-thing" or? I have no idea idea. It just strikes my sense of justice to see you go unpunished when others have been banned for the same offense. :( Maybe Eric can explain why Barefootsies deserves special treatment over others? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I could not care less about his spamming, actually shows how desperate he is and that is not a good feature for a businessman, so to me he dug his hole himself.
I only called him out on what he did in a thread that is dear to me and a lot of my fellow members/friends of this great community... If you fuck with a friend or family I WILL STEP UP. Now his apologies as the same effect to me as anything coming out of the mouth of a politician, it was un-sincere and very weak... He can stay or be gone, I did what I felt I had to do and now... FUCK HIM!!!! |
Dont let Warchild scare ya, Glock 19 > Brazilly Jitsu ;)
Just clowning WC, chances are, WC would have me on my back on the floor before I could pull my piece. |
Quote:
If you do not want to accept that, that's your prerogative. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I already wrote out the details in the other thread. |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
Ohhh I sooo believe |
I'm out of here before the retard started hitting up my friends with his bs stories on icq again, kthxbye.
|
i probably should vote too.. getting tired of this shit
|
Sigalicious!
|
Just set his account that he can only 2 posts a day.
I don't think it will be intersting posts. It's annoying |
ok...
OK I admit it, my name is a fake nick, I am really Steve.... Lightspeed !
Now promote all my sites biatches ! Make me rich... again ! |
Since no rules were broken, no banning (at least for me) would be warranted.
FACT: No One Was Called a Scammer Carry on. :pimp |
i was here
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc