NYT -Interesting Article about Porn Tubes
 

Interesting read indeed.
Thanks.

Good article. Some really stupid comments by the readers.

of course brazzers would love this article.

those on the outside of the biz have no clue anyway,

Interesting article. This caught my attention.

"Of course, whether any of this is desirable depends on your point of view about the morality of, and possible social harm caused by, pornography."

Anyone anti porn has to be anti porn tubes as well. At no time have so many been watching porn as now.

"The Internet is a copyright-infringement machine." - I agree this is largely true.

I think that it's fair to place some photos on your site and link back to the content owner with some % of the traffic (using FHGs or links to main site, etc.). However, putting long videos on your site and not giving the owner of the content any traffic back is not good.

This article says Youtube has been sued for copyright infringement by Viacom. I have some sites where I place embedded Youtube videos. Youtube encourages webmasters to place embedded Youtube videos on their sites. I think that if some Youtube content is stolen - that is Youtube's problem. It should not be a problem for me if I place an embedded Youtube video on my site.

Fatfoo is one of the top world mystery for me