GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   So I was just at Porn Hub and... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=967705)

V_RocKs 05-10-2010 07:59 AM

So I was just at Porn Hub and...
 
... I was amazed at how much quality porn they had there for the price of FREE. What also amazed me was that if I were a 13 year old boy and I wanted to see some lesbian action there were several Sapphic Erotica videos there in their entirety. I didn't have to verify my age and the resolution/quality was basically HD.

I predict that once the white house goes republican again, we will see them clamp down on porn because this is getting way to out of hand.

xNetworx 05-10-2010 08:03 AM

and you fapped

Barefootsies 05-10-2010 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpporn (Post 17125471)
and you fapped

The pud was pounded.

_Richard_ 05-10-2010 08:05 AM

i wondered about the 2257 dodge for those sites..

Roald 05-10-2010 08:05 AM

And the point of this thread is?

MovieMaster 05-10-2010 08:09 AM

Uhh Its time to get passed that whole republican drum beat of they are coming after porn.... If bush didn't do it... It won't happen unless your really pushing the legal limits.

IllTestYourGirls 05-10-2010 08:11 AM

Where is pornhub located?

cthulhu_waves 05-10-2010 08:18 AM

You had me at Sapphic Erotica...

CarlosTheGaucho 05-10-2010 08:22 AM

I can't imagine to even get excited about porn if I was 13 today, shit is out of hand.

V_RocKs 05-10-2010 08:23 AM

Point is... Eventually someone is going to commission some kind of study. A group of Christians that protects the rights of children. And they are going to find that 30% of tube sites clientel are 15 to 17 years old.

That means kids in the millions accessing porn. At that age you'd be lucky to see something crazier than the usual sex stuff on cable. Not anal, DP, gagging, bondage, etc...

Roald 05-10-2010 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 17125513)
Point is... Eventually someone is going to commission some kind of study. A group of Christians that protects the rights of children. And they are going to find that 30% of tube sites clientel are 15 to 17 years old.

That means kids in the millions accessing porn. At that age you'd be lucky to see something crazier than the usual sex stuff on cable. Not anal, DP, gagging, bondage, etc...

Eventually earth will explode, I am not holding my breath on it though.

Unless 2012 is true ofcourse ;))

Jarmusch 05-10-2010 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 17125513)
That means kids in the millions accessing porn. At that age you'd be lucky to see something crazier than the usual sex stuff on cable. Not anal, DP, gagging, bondage, etc...

Your friends didn't lend you vhs tapes with extreme porn when you were 13?

V_RocKs 05-10-2010 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarmusch (Post 17125543)
Your friends didn't lend you vhs tapes with extreme porn when you were 13?

Nope... Back when I was 13 "nobody jacked off" except for you.

just a punk 05-10-2010 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 17125513)
Point is... Eventually someone is going to commission some kind of study. A group of Christians that protects the rights of children.

Don't the US children have a right to see porn? :1orglaugh

To be serious, a NORMAL child is NOT interesting in browsing internet for porn, just because he/she doesn't need it physiologically.

Paul Markham 05-10-2010 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17125560)
To be serious, a NORMAL child is NOT interesting in browsing internet for porn, just because he/she doesn't need it physiologically.

I must of been abnormal then. Me and Janet D. were "experimenting" when we were 13. :1orglaugh

Maybe US kids grow up slower. :1orglaugh

just a punk 05-10-2010 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17125612)
I must of been abnormal then. Me and Janet D. were "experimenting" when we were 13. :1orglaugh

Maybe US kids grow up slower. :1orglaugh

13 y/o is not a child. In medical terminology such a person is a TEENAGER. So it's absolutely normal if a teenager is interesting in subject of an opposite sex (boys are interested in girls and girls are interested in boys). This not an aberration. The real problem if 13 y/o male is not interested in females and it's even worse if he is interested in other males...

seeandsee 05-10-2010 09:06 AM

tubessssssssssss i blame tubez

Cyber Fucker 05-10-2010 09:16 AM

Hello and welcome to the real world. :)

Cyber Fucker 05-10-2010 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17125628)
13 y/o is not a child. In medical terminology such a person is a TEENAGER. So it's absolutely normal if a teenager is interesting in subject of an opposite sex (boys are interested in girls and girls are interested in boys). This not an aberration. The real problem if 13 y/o male is not interested in females and it's even worse if he is interested in other males...

:1orglaugh True that.

BaldBastard 05-10-2010 09:18 AM

Get off PornHub man and head to YouJizz way more over there and longer movies.

LeRoy 05-10-2010 09:18 AM

My dad had the playboy handy in every bathroom. I can remember being 7 or 8 looking at em.

My best friends dad had a massive hardcore VHS collection. 1000's of videos and I think we watched them all by the 5th grade.

Porn Hub pffff. aint got nothin on that.

fatfoo 05-10-2010 09:23 AM

Yes, Porn Hub even has Sakura long videos. It's addicting. I have brokered advertising deals for Porn Hub from some person that messaged me on icq some time ago. Message me on icq, if you want to discuss some Internet business deals at icq:396815963.

TheDoc 05-10-2010 09:23 AM

Out of bad things on the Internet, even the worst porn is at the very bottom of the list of bad shit young adults or kids could find online.

Parents should not let kids or young adults online without supervision and strong filters and everyone should stop expecting the Internet to monitor other peoples children......

PR_Glen 05-10-2010 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17125628)
13 y/o is not a child. In medical terminology such a person is a TEENAGER. So it's absolutely normal if a teenager is interesting in subject of an opposite sex (boys are interested in girls and girls are interested in boys). This not an aberration. The real problem if 13 y/o male is not interested in females and it's even worse if he is interested in other males...

yeah what a travesty it would be if someone were to actually realize they were a homosexual... what would jesus think?

BIGTYMER 05-10-2010 10:18 AM

Like I said before we're in a race to give as much free porn as possible and PornHub is winning.

kada 05-10-2010 11:01 AM

yep, i agree..but this isnt just pornhub.. tubes are popping up all over like mushrooms
The amount of porn exposed to the young generation is staggering..
One thing is for sure.. and that is; we are breeding a generation of chronic perverts and nothing is going to be done about it.
i think its only going to get worse cos times have changed

FlexxAeon 05-10-2010 11:09 AM

honestly... the gov't isn't gonna move on it until something highly publicized happens in relation to it. then watch how fast the wheels of democracy turn

DamianJ 05-10-2010 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17125628)
The real problem if 13 y/o male is not interested in females and it's even worse if he is interested in other males...

Fucking homophobic cunt.

scottybuzz 05-10-2010 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 17125513)
Point is... Eventually someone is going to commission some kind of study. A group of Christians that protects the rights of children. And they are going to find that 30% of tube sites clientel are 15 to 17 years old.

That means kids in the millions accessing porn. At that age you'd be lucky to see something crazier than the usual sex stuff on cable. Not anal, DP, gagging, bondage, etc...

Yes this is very new on the internet, because there used to be very strict age verifications before tubes.

:thumbsup

Jon Oso 05-10-2010 11:13 AM

If people would start parenting instead of just having kids and hoping for the best 80% or more of these problems would go away. And not just due to online porn.

FWIW when I was 13 me and a couple friends had a HUGE stack of images we printed off the computer we kept in a box. It was just as easy to access back then as it is now, but instead of 30 second free clips now you get 30 minute HD videos.

Still accomplished the same thing

V_RocKs 05-10-2010 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 17126066)
Yes this is very new on the internet, because there used to be very strict age verifications before tubes.

:thumbsup

Before tubes you couldn't find the entire video without a lot of effort. Yes, torrents and rapidshare are another route... But those are piracy and therefor illegal. I am talking about porn companies running tubes. They are bypassing age verification.

As for a neighbor's porn stash or your uncles...

You didn't have carte-blanch access to it. You probably got in there once a week if lucky and once every several months is probably more likely. Therefor you couldn't obsess on it and spend more time checking it out then trying to score with real girls. Now kids can sit in their rooms on their laptops using proxies to bypass family filters and watch porn 24/7.

DiF0r 05-10-2010 11:46 AM

Where were all these porntubes when I was 13 :mad:

mvee 05-10-2010 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 17125516)
Eventually earth will explode, I am not holding my breath on it though.

Unless 2012 is true ofcourse ;))

No explosions just the return of Quatzequatel

A-n-D-r-E-S 05-10-2010 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DiF0r (Post 17126169)
Where were all these porntubes when I was 13 :mad:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

just a punk 05-10-2010 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 17126059)
Fucking homophobic cunt.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Jdoughs 05-10-2010 01:02 PM

I've found pornhub and tube8 both accessed from my teenage boys computers. They have filters and security installed on them so they shouldn't be able to reach the sites.

But guess what, little fuckers are smarter at getting around it then I am (or the programs used) are for stopping them.

13 and 17, and they didn't hear about it from me. When I was a teenager you could only pass that Cheri or Fox around so many times, but these url's are learnt in Grade 6-7 in school nowadays.

And I'll tell you right now, finding a stack of hardcore magazines in their room would only make me chuckle and remember my teens, finding out they've browsed Pornhub and Tube8 terrifies me.

PenisFace 05-10-2010 01:23 PM

You know what? I'll never agree the "omg you must be 18 to look at boobs" stuff. Do I understand it? Absolutely, but I still don't agree with it. When I was like 14, my sole purpose in life was to masturbate as much as possible, to the sexiest women I could find. Hello, internet :P

Why make some poor kid who's beating off 10 times a day use a sears catologue turned to the women's bra section? I was 50x hornier and 50x happier to look at porn when I was between 13 and 16 than I am now. Like it or not, I bet the biggest consumer of free internet porn is boys between those ages :1orglaugh

And since boys between those ages are pretty much 100% internet savvy now, I bet 95% of them are frequent visitors to the big tube sites. Which probably explains their terrible conversion ratios :1orglaugh All the old men (the ones we sell smut to) have never heard of a tube, and still frequent thehun and google images to get their rocks off.

BlackCrayon 05-10-2010 01:26 PM

they're just doing their part to overporn the government.

grumpy 05-10-2010 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by illtestyourgirls (Post 17125492)
where is pornhub located?

swiftwill inc usa

L-Pink 05-10-2010 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 17125476)
i wondered about the 2257 dodge for those sites..

Always been my question also .......


.

GlobalCorp 05-10-2010 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 17125513)
Point is... Eventually someone is going to commission some kind of study. A group of Christians that protects the rights of children. And they are going to find that 30% of tube sites clientel are 15 to 17 years old.

That means kids in the millions accessing porn. At that age you'd be lucky to see something crazier than the usual sex stuff on cable. Not anal, DP, gagging, bondage, etc...

Exactly.
Great thread!

Storm_Tracker 05-10-2010 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17125628)
13 y/o is not a child. In medical terminology such a person is a TEENAGER. So it's absolutely normal if a teenager is interesting in subject of an opposite sex (boys are interested in girls and girls are interested in boys). This not an aberration. The real problem if 13 y/o male is not interested in females and it's even worse if he is interested in other males...


:thumbsup yes the fags are the problem.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123