Websites, Affiliate Program, Processors Named in ** Suit
 

http://www.xbiz.com/news/120984

Tuesday, May 25, 2010 Text size:
ORLANDO — A federal lawsuit charges the operators of ExposedExGFS.com and KinkyGFS.com with republishing ** images that were poached from an online message board.

I can make some processings!!!!!!!!

Are frauDulent datinG sites next?

It also names Moniker Privacy Services and Whois Privacy Protection. :1orglaugh

lol

But of course you can

uh how are they 2257 compliant if they had/have her pics on their site? yea...

Man that's fucked....Thank God CCBill wasn't processing for them.

wow just wow

Wow. I wonder if any other sponsors used/ or is using her stuff on their gf/exgf sites

Time for all the exgf sites to become 2257 compliant.

It wouldn't matter.

There were some earlier cases where companies tried to sue the processor, the hosting company, affiliate programs, and anyone else you could think of in relation to the offending site to try and send a message to the profiteers. The judge threw that out. So you can only go after the offending company apparently.

It was covered in XBIZ a few months back.

and where are my payments sickbucks?

not a good situation

Nice.

:1orglaugh

The article says poaching 'CP' images ... not poaching nude images of girls over 18 ... those sites mentioned had girls that looked really young ...

it was only a matter of time and I expect there will be many more to follow

She should go after 4chan not those sites.

You would think that Fry guy would be locked up. Flying out a minor to enage in sexual activity.

This might be a good wakeup call for anyone who runs a exgf site. Buy your content with 2257. Submissions are only going to get you and your affiliates in trouble.

Was it a cp case? And just because a judge did in one court does not mean another judge will do the same thing in another.

see sig for legal content :)

Contact the DOJ :thumbsup

"It is clear the defendant websites published the images of Doe without so much as taking the time to obtain or inspect the 18 U.S.C. § 2257 records, and had they done so, photographs of Doe as a minor in actual sexually explicit conduct, would not have been published for profit on their commercial websites," the suit said"

so many fucking idiots in the adult biz i swear....

exactly :2 cents: case law is a guideline - every case is different.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Wonder if they'll look into affiliates too? Maybe.. maybe..

That sucks.