GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Saddam had to be removed because he was resisting the New World Order. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=978996)

Martin 07-21-2010 07:34 AM
Saddam had to be removed because he was resisting the New World Order.
 

Phoenix 07-21-2010 07:35 AM
nice find....its all in front of peoples eyes....doubtful anything can be stopped now though

CaptainHowdy 07-21-2010 07:36 AM
Just passing by...

BlackCrayon 07-21-2010 07:53 AM
"new world order" is just a phrase.

Martin 07-21-2010 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 17351543)
nice find....its all in front of peoples eyes....doubtful anything can be stopped now though
The biggest threat to the NWO is the armed American public. That's why they're trying to demonize gun owners and patriots. I used to think that Americans were gun crazed hill billies, but now I see them as our last hope.

Martin 07-21-2010 07:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 17351594)
"new world order" is just a phrase.
phrase for what?

cherrylula 07-21-2010 07:59 AM
well duh lol

Dollarmansteve 07-21-2010 08:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17351604)
phrase for what?
In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?

What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.

Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.

Amputate Your Head 07-21-2010 08:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 17351637)
In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?

What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.

Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.
Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"

Martin 07-21-2010 08:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 17351637)
In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?

What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.

Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.
Or maybe its a phrase for exactly what they want.. A New World Order. It's not a super-secret master plan. It's the world they have been building towards for many years now and if you resist them what you get is what happened in Iraq.

seeandsee 07-21-2010 08:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17351541)
who cares, what is done is done...

rabbit 07-21-2010 08:24 AM
they went after him because he continually refused to take loans from their banks

Martin 07-21-2010 08:25 AM


"When we are successful.. And we will be"

cwd 07-21-2010 08:25 AM
nwo rocks!
http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/7800/nwoz.jpg

Phoenix 07-21-2010 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rabbit (Post 17351673)
they went after him because he continually refused to take loans from their banks
luckily greece fell in line...and spain next

Barry-xlovecam 07-21-2010 08:50 AM
Saddam was the convenient ''bad guy'' or whipping boy to avenge 9/11. Much as Hitler's invasion of Poland was to rally public support ...

Had the US concentrated on Afghanistan, whose invasion was justified, IMHO ? continued to ''contain'' Saddam's Iraq at a cost of $12 Billion/yr ... How much did the invasion of Iraq cost ? $500 Billion?

For $120 Billion by now, containment might have achieved the same result in Iraq at about 25% of the cost.

That $400 Billion must be paid somehow. How? The housing market was used, abused then busted, then crisis and the financial mess that we have today.

Saddam got his revenge ultimately and a substantial part of the world sees him as a martyr to American Imperialism ? just what did the US and its allies win?

Dirty deeds done not so cheap ...

Dollarmansteve 07-21-2010 09:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17351653)
Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"
Ya but if they knew they you knew that they would know that people would know that, then would they know not to use that name?

_Richard_ 07-21-2010 09:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17351603)
The biggest threat to the NWO is the armed American public. That's why they're trying to demonize gun owners and patriots. I used to think that Americans were gun crazed hill billies, but now I see them as our last hope.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh know what you mean

Amputate Your Head 07-21-2010 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 17351918)
Ya but if they knew they you knew that they would know that people would know that, then would they know not to use that name?
Hmmm, probably not because they have no way of knowing that we know that they knew that people would know, unless they knew that we also would know that they have no way of knowing that! Those sneaky bastards! Well, the jig's up now because now we know.

Martin 07-21-2010 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17351970)
Hmmm, probably not because they have no way of knowing that we know that they knew that people would know, unless they knew that we also would know that they have no way of knowing that! Those sneaky bastards! Well, the jig's up now because now we know.
That's pretty funny, but these nwo people don't give a shit if we know what they're up to anymore. They know most think it's just a big kooky conspiracy. The rest don't give a shit because they're content with the status quo. They got their sports, beer and affliction t-shit and life is good. I guess if this is what the people want they'll get it. To me this nwo they have in the works looks like a ultra-reactionary, hyper-capitalist, authoritarian police state.

D Ghost 07-21-2010 11:55 AM
what saddam is dead?!?!?!?!

D Ghost 07-21-2010 11:56 AM
Yeah the US put him in there. Economics. They tried to take him out in early 90s and take control of Iraq. Then he still wasnt doing what they wanted him to do. So they tried to kill him a bunch of times throughout the 90s, he was very agile and good at dodging "jackals".

Quote:
Jackals are CIA-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn’t work, they perform assassinations—or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren’t able to get through to Saddam Hussein… His bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn’t get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we’ve obviously done in Iraq.
Until finally, got the real chance in early 2000s (right after 9/11) and did it.

Still have no idea why we went into Iraq after 9/11 ? What was the connection? LMAO ;)

Sly 07-21-2010 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17351653)
Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"
LOL. Genius!

D Ghost 07-21-2010 12:01 PM
read my post above people ^^

Dollarmansteve 07-21-2010 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17351970)
Hmmm, probably not because they have no way of knowing that we know that they knew that people would know, unless they knew that we also would know that they have no way of knowing that! Those sneaky bastards! Well, the jig's up now because now we know.
No matter what, I think we can agree that the consequences will never be the same.

PGR 07-21-2010 12:11 PM
we are borg

resistance is futile


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc