Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules
 

Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

since im not an American, They would know it better but, whats wrong with that?

They were too cheap to get a vendor's license. That's really all there is to the story.

You'd think that a vendor's license would have been cheaper than all their legal fees.

You would think, buy people don't always think first. :1orglaugh

They say it's not easy to get it, isn't it?

Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

The Headline should be:
Condom vendors fail to get license and try to justify it by saying it is a 1st amendment free speech issue.
If they were giving them away free then it is political speech, if they are charging for them it is a business. . .

Sums it up. :2 cents:

yeah title totally misrepresents that actual jist of the story.

it would be a free speech issue if they had bought the vendor licience.

Your point?

Charging for a product isn't free speech....


Jack

Licenses are required for ridiculous things sometimes, like a stripper license.