![]() |
Idiots here still can't shoot proper ex-gf content.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
so many of you dumb content producers trying and failing hard still I see. Losers. |
Some pull it off, some don't.
A lot of the sites miss the mark too. |
where are the examples?
|
What's an example of "good" vs. "bad" ex-gf content?
Instead of just saying they suck. Tell us why... |
I totally agree but this thread is worthless without pics.
|
Hi Simon
|
Don't think I have gotten any complaints. :-)
|
Yea, it's easy to attack...but let's see what works and what doesn't.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Are we talking about the look of authenticity? I would also like to see examples of good vs bad content
|
only thing that seems bad about some of it is the lighting is too good.
|
Quote:
Quote:
The myth is that all that all exgf content has to be shot by morons who can't put a camera on auto exposure/focus. LOL :2 cents: The whole thing about exgf (can it be current GF being naughty? :1orglaugh ) content is the performance of the girl or/and guy. Yes with todays models it's tough getting them to do anything for real. They seem to keep real for free and fake for paid. Can it be shot sometimes on a decent camera, in a well lit room and by someone with enough brains to know how to use a camera? Or does it always have to be shot by a moron on his/her phone? We have a little amateur camera that shoots stills and videos. The problem is it's probably to good exgf. Cost about $400 years ago. If you're willing to pay the price and give enough work people will come up with the goods. And I believe this is the problem. The cost of shooting it and the ROI does not warrant putting too much effort into it. Yes the shooter has to break out of his style to shoot it, but that's a short learning curve. Dumbing down takes less skill than improving on style. |
Alrighty then...
|
no pics in such thread, jesus no delivery here
|
Yeah, we need pics to see what is considered "good" Ex-gf and what's "bad/pro style pretending to be ex-gf"
|
Quote:
And this all right Exgf content. Shot them during castings and sold them to phones and magazine companies. As for video. I posted on another thread a recipe on how a shooter doing a casting of 10 girls could make around $4000+ doing the same type of content. |
Who would PAY for ex-girlfriend content? Thats just retarded there is tons of free shit out there.
|
Quote:
This is not directed at you but all trying to buy Exgf content. The stuff I was shooting on castings was making us around $300 to $400 a set, no video, and we still own it and sell it on the content stores. To get exclusive you have to be looking at $1500 for 5 scenes set and videos, to get a girl in for a day. And that would be an EU model on around $500 a day. The only models that turn up for 1/2 a day are going to charge $300, if they turn up. Once you start thinking of US models it can get pricey. Or non exclusive and in that market you have to take what's there. What this thread lacks, and others on the same subject, is examples of what is considered good content. Otherwise producers are shooting without a clear knowledge of what's required. |
Check this thread I just made explaining the GF / ex-GF niche.
I hope it helps out some confused producers :winkwink: http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/983107-producers-truths-ex-gf-content.html I originally wrote if as a reply for this thread but it just got too long so I figured I would start its own. |
It is pretty easy to tell whether ex gf content is shot by a studio or shot by some guy with a cheap digital camera and I think the surfers who are looking for that type of content also know the difference pretty well. If u look at some of the ex gf sites u can tell who has the "real goods" and who dosent. These guys are looking for the home made shot at home stuff not studio stuff.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc