Porn Site operator among Rand Paul donors
 

not surprising really-
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100820/...entucky_senate
"Federal Election Commission records show that Cyan Banister, founder of the site Zivity.com along with her husband, contributed $4,800 to Paul earlier this year."

Sounds like a brilliant gorilla traffic generation technique to me.

out of all the republicans he is probably the one who is safe as far as regulating our business. But somehow I still dont feel too comfortable with him.

This sort of smear tactic is what Rand's opponent is resorting to? Pathetic.

I've given money to number of candidates over the years, guess it's good thing I never tell people...:winkwink:

Interesting that the porn site they own takes paypal

http://www.zivity.com/signup

Looks like the owner worked for paypal

serving as VP Ideas at GoTo-incubator Idealab. As an initial investor and Director at PayPal, he was a co-inventor of the ‘email payments’ product now widely used on eBay

Ive heard owners of horny matches are huge Ron Paul supporters

Jack Conway is losing that race badly, even after all the lies they have told about Rand.

8 million in investment funding for a paysite
http://social.venturebeat.com/2008/0...space-sort-of/

The establishment is getting more desperate by the day. :2 cents:

You have every right to be uncomfortable. He is very religious. Also I laugh when porners say they are libertarians . Libertarians are big on states rights. Federal law protects what we do, if it was up to the states we would be fucked.

Gorillas? Where?

Seriously though... good to see people putting money behind their chosen candidates.

OK, I'll bite. What Federal law protects porn?

you are protected under freedom of speech the first amendment.

Rand Paul is a *certified ophthalmologist










*certified by a certification board the he himself created.. lol
http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/06/...certification/

The Bill of Rights was created to keep the states from trampling the rights of the individual. But make no mistake, the country was founded on limited central governmental powers. The framers knew that an over reaching federal government would be the downfall of the USA and a burden to individual freedom. Localized government works more efficiently and less oppressively.

Ron Paul gets it. It's too bad he can't articulate like obama. But people get bored with silly things like facts and substantial, reasoned communication. After all, platitudes and high ideals are much less boring and what win elections.

Have you even read your STATE constitution? :helpme

My state has freedom of speech. I dont know about yours. Does your state not give you freedom of speech? :Oh crap

Rand will be president one day, im sure of it

http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/ph...06-8693042.jpg

but first he has to beat the lying, big spending, Obama supporting Democrat in his US Senate race and he needs your help:

http://www.randpaul2010.com/

funny old rand have no problem filling his practice with government medicare dollars.

Paul said he sees patients who rely on the government programs, private insurance or who pay for their own care.

"I don't discriminate in my practice, and though I'd prefer to have less government intervention in ... medicine, I put my patients first in this matter," the Republican said. "My medical practice has never been about any ideology or running for office."

-

Jack Conway is a lying liberal who wants to end the fillibuster making the job killing Pelosi-Obama agenda easier to ram through congress.

Supporting Rand Paul is critical and the Democrats are going to run a massive smear campaign against a good man so help him out

:1orglaugh

that's not the way it works. if fed law wasnt there. Assuming you have an adult website.Alabama decides porn is illegal in AL and since you are selling it thur the net there and/or allowing their citizens to see it they could throw you in jail but the first amendment protects you.
Also old rand aint no small government or a personal freedoms guy he is just for the government that does the things he wants. Cant say personal freedom and then in the next breath abortion should be illegal. Or talk about government wasting money and you build your practice on government dollars.

What makes him a good man? He accepts medicare dollars they are the bulk of his business. Your tax dollars line his pockets.

I got this information from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul:

Randal Howard "Rand" Paul (born January 7, 1963) is an American ophthalmologist and political activist who describes himself as a "constitutional conservative". Rand Paul is the chairman and founder of Kentucky Taxpayers United. He is also the son of Republican Congressman Ron Paul of Texas.

In August 2009, Paul officially announced his candidacy for the United States Senate seat currently held by retiring Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky. Paul, a Republican, won the party's primary election on May 18, 2010. He will face Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway in the general election on November 2, 2010.

:1orglaugh

1) A fetus does not have a right to live? Where is the personal freedom of that fetus? He believes that a fetus is alive, which it is, so it has rights.

2) Didnt you bash Ron Paul for not taking medicare? I would rather have people like Rand taking medicare. I don't see the big deal. Next you will be saying he is driving on roads and using public toilets.

you see what you want to see. If it makes you happy Im glad. :)

Rand would be the biggest defender of the First amendment in the US senate

Tell me what I am missing? Because these attacks on Rand have become pretty pathetic.

From racist democrats pretending to be Rand supporters to making up stories about him kidnapping and drugging a woman.

True, Paul is against abortion as he believes it to be murder. Why? Because as an GY-OBN, he can be sued if he harms a fetus for malpractice.

He believes that this is a states rights issue and not within the constitutional authority of any branch of the federal government.

He is actually very consistent.

Jack Conway, trial lawyers, union bosses and the whole establishment are out to destroy a good man in Rand Paul

Jack Conway is a lying liberal who supports war, deficit spending and the job killing agenda of Pelosi, Reid and Obama. He would be another vote for that. Even worse, he supports ending the fillibuster which means things like Cap and Trade being rammed through the Senate with 51 votes, making himself irrelevant because he serves his masters in his party, not the people

Conway has millions in special interest money from bankers, lobbyists, lawyers. everyone who has milked the taxpayer and he's going to use it in a nasty campaign

Im not attacking Im stating facts he takes government dollars to build his own wealth and he is for government being out of our lives but wants to make abortion illegal. No attacks, hey you work in adult and want extreme righties in god bless just dont bitch when the rules change.

do you have same news source as Vendzilla ? Care to share ?


Yep, " losing that race badly " :1orglaugh

my sperms are alive .... and I still kill them ....

Please post link to that news source. :1orglaugh

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...entucky_senate

Maybe they have changed the definition of statistically tied?

http://fwix.com/louisville/share/cb0...9_conway_at_40

You beat me to it IllTestYourGirls.

Wait is that one that has them tied the same one Conway paid for and was done in house?

also Zivity.com isnt really a porn site its more of an art photography site.

These the complete results from the poll. I don't think it was in house, but I have never heard of them.

http://politics.mycn2.com/wp-content...ug-19-poll.pdf

Reuters had one recently that had Paul of by 5 among likely voters.

Without a doubt. But the left wants to paint it as a porn site in hopes that Rand loses some of the harder right bible thumps. Just add it to the list of hack jobs done on Rand.

it was the AP that broke the story not Keith O , I think most people see naked online they assume porn but its not.

You don't think the AP was tipped off by anyone wanting to smear Paul?

I do not post links anymore to news source, as it seems common ....

but since you asked : http://politics.mycn2.com/2010/08/19...n2-poll-shows/

AS for the validity of either polls , the election will be the real poll :2 cents:

This is interesting. 2 weeks ago this same poll had Paul leading: 40.6%-31.4%. Full results here: http://politics.mycn2.com/wp-content...State-Tabs.pdf

So, what changed? They changed their sample methodology. The most recent poll says, "Sampling for this study was conducted using a Kentucky RDD sample." while the 2 week old poll says, "Sampling for this study was conducted using a Kentucky Voter List supplemented with a new registrant voter list per our in house statistician's recommendation."

RDD = Random Digit Dialing. It is when you generate telephone numbers at random to select who to poll.

it was public record not some secret file uncovered.

They had to dig through "public records" and this was the best they could find?

Just skim through Jack Conways and you will see a lot of people who list their occupation as lobbyist :2 cents:

what a bunch of hucksters. fuck em all.

I live in the city that Paul has is eye practice and I can tell you that being a democrat in this state makes you the minority....Paul unless he really does another stupid thing or makes himself sound even dumber then he has already will get the win and then we can move on and start talking about why he should be out of office just like we do everyone that is elected....lol my opinion though :)